Posted on 07/28/2023 4:38:29 PM PDT by GingisK
Test message
We’ve been instructed to keep discussions civil.
Someone just switched it back.
I can now reply to you here in the thread. I could not before and documented that inability to do so.
I got your PM but replied here instead to see if it was working for me now. :)
The trolls are the ones who weren’t civil; however, I don’t think the one who got banned was any near as bad as others have been on unrelated threads. He seemed kind of tame to me. Not very open minded, but not as rude as I have seen survive the moderators.
Please report to your handlers it’s not working this time:
I get no sense of what you are trying to relate.
Most things interest me. It’s distracting at times. Only professional sports bore me.
I’ve really had it with “I know a guy whose name I can’t tell you” testimony.
Say who it is or be held in contempt
“Say who it is or be held in contempt”
If the witness names names in public they go straight to jail for violating their national security oath.
They are giving the information in private congressional committee sessions—as permitted by law.
Hey there are grainy blurry pictures of bugs with square kind of things crawling on window screens!
Do you have any clear photos from the one billion hi-res iPhone cameras blanketing the planet?
Uh, no, just a few things from military pilots.
How many photos from civilian pilots, or air passengers, whose total time aloft looking out the window is 1000x the military pilots’ time aloft?
I don’t know why they don’t , maybe the FBI threatened them. Or seized their cameras.
A lot of factors go into a clear photograph: Lighting conditions, lens quality, atmospheric conditions, movement of subject, movement of camera, shutter speed, and so on. Almost nobody uses a tripod; and, that is absolutely necessary for a sharp image. I can indeed show you a clear picture of a UFO that has been declared authentic by the Kodak Image Laboratory and two other independent imaging experts. I also know you still won't believe it.
Golf in particular, the rest close behind.
I notice Kirkpatrick calls the testimony “insulting” and denies they are attempting reverse engineering but never actually denies
the assertion that they have in their possession some sort of alien vehicle or equipment and non-human biological remains.
Good catch. I failed to pick up on that.
It floors me that people don’t seem to apply every-day common sense to this issue. Like this one - sometimes, people lie.
People lie all the time, and for all kinds of reasons. Just because someone says something, doesn’t mean it’s true. Many times people lie about things just for the attention.
That’s why actual ‘evidence’ is needed - and not the ‘evidence’ of people lying, or attesting to people saying things that could be lies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.