Posted on 09/20/2023 11:12:53 AM PDT by ransomnote
I know of only 2 babies so far who were conceived after both parents had had at least 3 shots a piece, but perhaps they had 4 or 5. I don’t know. One mother had covid in the 2nd trimester. The baby is fine. She was 7lbs. 8oz. at birth, has been nursing like a champ and gaining weight. She was 7 weeks yesterday and felt like about 5-6kgs. She’s a very pretty baby, seems healthy. I hope she stays that way.
It’s all an experiment. The parents couldn’t consent because they were not informed. So, I don’t know what to make of these ‘special’ babies.
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Researchers Alarmed to Find DNA Contamination in Pfizer Vaccine, Seruzawa wrote: |
Lol. I’m not defending the vac. But I’m also not panicking over a DNA strand like you nuts. |
I have not posted about the DNA strand. You are attacking, pointlessly, medically relevant concerns which point at best to marked incompetence. It's passive support for the Covid 'vaccine'. Vax apologists are known to do that; ignore Pfizer/CDC ignorance/malice and ridicule people with comments which mean, "What? You don't want your DNA altered? You wanted warnings about risks?" and then you insert ridicule.
Do you think that's a great idea?
I don't.
Ping to my reply #23 in case you’re interested. :-)
“Lol. I’m not defending the f***ing vac. But I’m also not panicking over a DNA strand like you nuts.”
___________________________
Let’s start with whether or not there are agendas formulated by powerfully connected globalists who are working towards population control.
True or false?
next question...
has the testing phase of these vaccines been proven to be adequatly safe and effective?
Have government agencies been found to have withheld and suppressed vital informed consent details?
And for a bonus question for Triple points, do individuals have sufficient cause for concern? Or do you have expertise training that would render these concerns to be nothing more than a “right wing conspiracy”?
Obviously you are. Not overtly, but with nonsensical statements. There is a difference between consuming something and injecting something.
How’s the weather there in Fools Paradise?
Yeah, both my parents got it...no problems.
I, however, won’t take it.
Great. How is it in Pahrump.
I scored 10 nuts. Pretty good for a Wednesday.
Naturally occurring DNA cannot be patented, but altered or “synthetic” DNA can be.
Wikipedia article: Biological patents in the United States
On November 30, 2012, the Supreme Court agreed to hear the plaintiffs' appeal of the Federal Circuit's ruling. In June 2013, in Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics (No. 12-398), the court unanimously ruled that, "A naturally occurring DNA segment is a product of nature and not patent eligible merely because it has been isolated," invalidating Myriad's patents on the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. However, the Court also held synthesized DNA sequences, not occurring in nature, can still be eligible for patent protection.
There was an article a few years back - which I can no longer find online - about patented kidney DNA. The gist of the article was that once “synthetic” DNA is in your body, the company that holds the patent has some legal rights regarding that DNA.
Just because it resides in your body doesn’t mean that you have exclusive rights to it. As others say - maybe in humor, maybe not - you become a type of genetically modified organism.
There is information available about the use of human DNA once it is extracted, and how it’s used.
Biological material derived from humans can be patented. When people sign waivers in these circumstances - usually involving medical testing or treatment, they usually waive their rights regarding the “donation” of their genetic material.
But it’s difficult - or impossible - to locate articles or information about the implantation (or injection) of synthetic or altered DNA into people, and the legal questions surrounding this practice.
The DNA “fragments” mentioned in the article may not be fragments at all.
Scary stuff.
Thanks.
BKMK
Buckhaults needs to study vaxxed homosexuals with HIV. HIV infection causes accelerated aging of 14 years, with subsequent illnesses. That is why HIV infected get more cancers, so he can see what and how much cancers they get.
To read more about HIV-caused premature aging, check FR keyword HIVacceleratedAging.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.