Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liz Cheney Says No Conviction Needed to Remove Trump From State Primary Ballots
Epoch Times ^ | 1/8/24 | Alice Giordano

Posted on 01/09/2024 4:37:49 AM PST by Duke C.

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 last
To: TexasFreeper2009
I think Nancy Pelosi should be imprisoned for treason, and “that there is no need to wait for a conviction or court ruling”

AND Biden too. Why wait?

These issues can be handled on the word of some bimbo whose 'daddy' was powerful and connected.

Like Liz's daddy.

We could save a lot of money by NOT having to maintain a legal system. All we gotta do is hand the choices over to stupid liberal 'elties'... How 'bout it Liz? ARE YOU READY? You and your daddy could pick the whole government. Right? To hell with that silly idea about 'the people' having a say...

81 posted on 01/10/2024 12:48:01 PM PST by GOPJ (FoxNews Lawrence Jones needs to visit Black, Hispanic and Asian breakfast places too.Let's get real)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

82 posted on 01/10/2024 12:53:04 PM PST by Manic_Episode (A government of the government, by the government, for the government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

The 14th Amendment seems to speak of “engaging in insurrection”.
It doesn’t mention a charge, a trial, or a conviction.


Right but I think the context was that it could be so obvious to be undeniable, such as a confederate military officer who wasn’t formally charged with a crime. I don’t think anyone would be able to rationally argue against that even without a criminal trial.


83 posted on 01/10/2024 1:03:17 PM PST by CraigEsq (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

+1


84 posted on 01/10/2024 1:04:09 PM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CraigEsq
I think the context was that it could be so obvious to be undeniable

Indeed. We had a full scale Civil War 1861-1865 and afterwards, if you were a Confederate veteran, or politician, it would have been so obvious that you had "engaged in an insurrection" that it didn't really need a lot of discussion.

But now it's 2024. Nancy Pelosi forms the opinion that some sort of insurrection took place? And she has decided that Trump is the one to blame? And THEREFORE Trump is ineligible for the presidency? Ummmmmmmmmmmm ... seems a stretch. I'm gonna need something a bit more substantial than that ...

85 posted on 01/10/2024 1:52:22 PM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson