Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Most distant galaxy cluster found
UPI | 4/10/02 | PHIL BERARDELLI

Posted on 04/11/2002 1:09:12 AM PDT by kattracks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 04/11/2002 1:09:12 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: longshadow; PatrickHenry; Physicist; ThinkPlease; blam; Sabertooth; boris; VadeRetro; Stultis...
Ping to those on RadioAstronomer's list. He is working long hours on a project and will be away much of the next 5 weeks. I will do my best to keep people pinged to interesting science threads.
2 posted on 04/11/2002 4:27:23 AM PDT by Scully
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scully
Thank you, Scully.


3 posted on 04/11/2002 5:56:19 AM PDT by Nebullis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Scully
Thanks for the ping.
4 posted on 04/11/2002 6:18:39 AM PDT by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Scully
Thanks for the ping. I'm ||CLOAKED|| and lurking.
5 posted on 04/11/2002 7:27:35 AM PDT by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Scully
evolved into the seemingly random and
irregular structures that comprise the visible universe.

Is random the right word?  Last I heard, the
structures in the universe are arranged outside
the 'bubbles' of a 'foamy' universe.  Not random.

6 posted on 04/11/2002 7:40:48 AM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The most distant galaxies are the fastest travelers in the Universe,

Aargh.  These galaxies aren't traveling any faster then we are.
They are essentially sitting there while the space between us
expands.

7 posted on 04/11/2002 7:50:58 AM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scully
elderly galactic bttt
8 posted on 04/11/2002 8:16:43 AM PDT by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
These galaxies aren't traveling any faster then we are. They are essentially sitting there while the space between us expands.

Do they even still "exist"?

9 posted on 04/11/2002 8:20:58 AM PDT by AndrewC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC
They may not. However, much can be analyzed and studied from the light that was/is emitted from those galaxys that continues to reach the Earth.
10 posted on 04/11/2002 8:44:08 AM PDT by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Scully
I will do my best to keep people pinged to interesting science threads.

Thank you.

11 posted on 04/11/2002 9:06:08 AM PDT by farmfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
good post,thanks
12 posted on 04/11/2002 10:35:50 AM PDT by green team 1999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scully
Traveling at the speed of light for 13.5 billion years. Man, that's a long way! How many miles away is that?
13 posted on 04/11/2002 11:25:51 AM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gcruse; Scully
Scully, Thanks much for the ping.

gcruse: About randomess and order.
Order and randomness seem to alternate as you increase scale from which the universe is viewed.
So...
- Our solar system seems to have a clockwork order.
- But stars tumble and drift within the galaxy's arms (randomness)
- Then the arms sweep in approximate radial symmetry and almost "phonograph record" radial velocity curves (order)
- But galaxies tumble loosely around the centers of mass of clusters (randomness)
- Then superclusters form into vast sheets and bubbles, with planar arrangements of clusters, and vast "empty" zones, or voids. (order)
- Then on the greatest scale, a vast gray just barely differentiated or mottled slightly. (amorphous or random).

This is a gross oversimplification, but it is interesting how order and randomness seem to alternate over a range of scales.

14 posted on 04/11/2002 3:47:53 PM PDT by edwin hubble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: blam
13.5 billion years at 186,000 miles per second, let's see...
186,000 miles per second times
3,600 seconds per hour times
24 hours per day times
365.25 days per year times
13.5 billion years = (approximately)
80,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 miles
15 posted on 04/11/2002 3:55:04 PM PDT by Gordian Blade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kattracks; Scully
Thanks for the post and ping. Check this out: If one could peer in ANY direction away from the Earth far enough back in time, one could observe the earliest detectible light and radio signatures of the universe and thus there is no single location from which all the matter and energy of the universe expanded. In other words, the Origin (the Big Bang) lies many billions of light-years away from us in EVERY direction. If we could look 14b light-years in ANY direction, we would see the universe when it was much smaller and dramatically closer to where it all began. Thus, the "point" from which the Big Bang kicked off, almost infinitely small at that time, now still encompasses the entire universe.

Simply mind-boggling. Our limited three-dimensional consciousness and the curvature of space-time make it impossible for our linear perception to grasp the true constitution of the universe outside unwieldy and insanely complex mathematical models. Gives me a headache everytime I think about it.

16 posted on 04/11/2002 3:59:16 PM PDT by fire and forget
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gordian Blade
"80,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 miles"

Holy Moly. How do I 'say' that?

17 posted on 04/11/2002 4:08:45 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: blam
80 sextillion miles, I think.
18 posted on 04/11/2002 4:28:07 PM PDT by jennyp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jennyp
"80 sextillion miles, I think."

LOL. Thanks.

19 posted on 04/11/2002 4:30:04 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: blam
No offense, but my trusty logarithm and a hasty calculation adjusted for quantum factors, gravity-induced deviations in the path light follows through space and other considerations, you're off by a parsec at least :)
20 posted on 04/11/2002 4:30:49 PM PDT by fire and forget
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson