I will say that after a multitude of questions by myself and other posters, you did mention that IT (the idea that the jury acquitted for Christmas) was a post by someone. You did not ever come back and say it was not part of the original news article or really clarify, even though asked repeatedly.
Do you see why I question what you say? When you (most likely UNINTENTIONALLY) mislead us?
And remember, As a person, and fellow FR poster I give you my respect. I attack the things you say, and do not want you to believe I am attacking you. When what I say comes off as attacking you as a person, I am sorry. That is my fault.
To: redlipstick; All
As you may be busy with dinner, family, and I want to go home, I will say Good evening and God Bless all of us here on FR.
Please, Red, don't back down from your stance on this case or let me keep you from responding in any way. You have a right to your thoughts, your opinions, and no one can tell us those are right or wrong.
I will do my best to make sure when I post, that the difference between those things, and facts of the case are very clear.
Good night everyone!
Why would you be more likely to believe it true if it came from the MEDIA?
You consistently bash me for posting MEDIA articles and listening to the radio.
posted on 01/15/2003 4:48:19 PM PST
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson