Skip to comments.2,100 for 2,100 [fraudulent voter registrations from ACORN]
Posted on 10/14/2008 1:12:36 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
In Lake County, IN the Registrar of Voters started examining voter registrations turned in by ACORN. Of the first 2,100 that were examined, 2,100 were found to be fraudulent. Yep, all of them. Drew Griffin at CNN has been doing an amazing job of reporting on various entities connected to the Obama campaign, and here's his report:
(MUST-SEE CNN VIDEO AT LINK)
In other words who casts the actual fradulent votes?
Uh, ACORN employees? Homeless bums? Illegals? All of the above?
Maddening! Simply maddening! That lawyer is a slimeball!
I am disgusted with what is happening in this country! How will we ever know who legitimately won an election?
No I.D. required...
The RATS want it fought through courts that are determined by Liberal
Emissaries (Congress), and ordered legal by Liberal Justices.
It's the American way, don't you know?
1. Photo-bearing ID required to vote (driver’s license, passport, or state ID)
2. Finger dipped in purple ink so you can’t vote multiple times/places
3. No early/absentee voting unless you’re stationed physically overseas
Only way to stop the fraud.
Oh, you're bound to have a few incorrectly completed registrations in every batch, this is normal.
I just submitted this to digg.com.
More and more conservatives are showing up to fight the raging leftism that lives at Digg. Join us if you have the stomach for it.
This is registration fraud. When you pay crackheads to register Democrats they will always return fraudulent registrations. This sort of thing is not new. For example, multiple democrat party organizations have been doing this in California for ages. It's easier to go through phonebooks and fill out the forms with invented information than to spend time in the hot sun begging people to register.
Payments may be supplemented by funds from local congressional and state legislative committees or other party organizations. Those entities benefit in a number of potential ways. More registered voters may mean a larger slice of state party funds for local party candidates and organizations. It may also result in more apportioned representation in state and county party organizations. Democrats can pretend to victims of the signature gatherers that they pay for the registrations, but the party knows going in exactly what they'll be getting for their money.
In areas where voter ID is not required (or the requirements not observed) it may be possible to bus people to polls to vote using the fraudulent names, although that is just one of the benefits of the fraudulent registration effort. A mountain of fraudulent registrations may only result in a comparative handful of fraudulent votes being cast, depending on the area.
1. Photo-bearing ID required to vote (drivers license, passport, or state ID)
2. Finger dipped in purple ink so you cant vote multiple times/places
3. No early/absentee voting unless youre stationed physically overseas
Only way to stop the fraud.
I think the ingenuity of slimeball lawyers and bottom feeding political hacks may still find means to get around these but they surely would limit the amount of fraud. Problem is the Government does not want it limited or it already would have been.
This is heavily dem Lake County (Gary and Hammond, IN); they will have cards ready or electronic votes registered before the polls even open. They will use whatever no shows on the registered voter list to cover the extra votes. As long as the votes do not exceed the registered voters it is almost impossible to catch without a repub pol watcher there... even if someone is there, it may happen before or after the poll closes.
It isn’t who votes and how, it is who counts the votes...
Okay, so see if I understand. To effect an outcome, crooked polling stations need a method by which they can add votes. If the rolls have been flooded by fraudulent ACORN voter submissions, then at the end of the day, (or maybe the beginning of the day) those extra votes need to be cast.
Is it really just that simple?
If the polls were monitored, and an actual physical count was made of all those entering, could not that count be compared with the vote tally at the end of the day? What about a tally of the books by observers (Count the number that showed up to vote, and hold the precinct to that number?
Are we so naive to miss that the elections have been rigged for years?
They only got caught when they cast more votes than the county had eligible voters. And when audited, they burned down the outbuilding that contained the ballet boxes...
Yea, it's been happening a LONG time...
Rush just almost quoted me about this subject a minute ago...
Yes I heard Rush!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.