Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Steelman eyes Bondís Senate seat in 2010
The St. Louis Post-Dispatcher ^ | January 8, 2008 | Tony Messenger

Posted on 01/08/2009 4:48:48 PM PST by Clintonfatigued

Outgoing Missouri Treasurer Sarah Steelman, who lost a bruising Republican primary for governor to Kenny Hulshof, said this afternoon she will take a look at running for the seat vacated by Sen. Kit Bond in 2010.

Bond announced in the Missouri House Chambers this morning that he will not run for re-election. Bond and Steelman have been at odds lately. Bond endorsed Hulshof in the primary, and Steelman wrote a letter to the Department of Justice to inform investigators of a conversation she had with Bond concerning the ousting of U.S. attorney Todd Graves.

Steelman today praised Bond for his service, but made it clear they don’t see eye to eye on policy.

“The people of Missouri and all over the country are seeking a different direction from Washington,” Steelman told the Post-Dispatch. Referring to the economic doldrums the country is in, Steelman said, “We can see the consequences now of the actions taken by Congress.”

In her run for governor, Steelman pounded Hulshof over his support of congressional earmarks, which have long been supported by Bond. Her campaign had been run by Republican political consultant Jeff Roe, who conflicted with Bond aide Jason Van Eaton when Roe worked in Washington, D.C. for Congressman Sam Graves.

Steelman said she heard about Bond’s decision this morning and was surprised. She said she thought he would run again in 2010.

Now, she’s looking at the seat.

“I’m thinking about it,” she said. “I’m watching what happens. I’ll give it some serious thought. I do think Missourians are ready to go in a new direction in Washington.”

(Excerpt) Read more at stltoday.com ...


TOPICS: Missouri; Campaign News; U.S. Senate
KEYWORDS: 2010

1 posted on 01/08/2009 4:48:48 PM PST by Clintonfatigued
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wk4bush2004

I thought of you when I saw this.


2 posted on 01/08/2009 4:49:37 PM PST by Clintonfatigued (If greed is a virtue, than corporate socialism is conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; Impy; Norman Bates; ExTexasRedhead; justiceseeker93; ...

Sarah Steelman is a great lady and she’d make a great Senator if she runs. I just hope the Missouri GOP doesn’t do to her what the New Jersey GOP did to Brett Schundler in 2001.


3 posted on 01/08/2009 4:51:37 PM PST by Clintonfatigued (If greed is a virtue, than corporate socialism is conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

I take it she is a Reagan Republican?


4 posted on 01/08/2009 4:54:27 PM PST by MSF BU (++)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MSF BU

“I take it she is a Reagan Republican?”

Very much so. One can also say she’s a Sarah Palin Republican.


5 posted on 01/08/2009 5:01:47 PM PST by Clintonfatigued (If greed is a virtue, than corporate socialism is conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

“I thought of you when I saw this.”

LOL! Yeah, I am thrilled about the prospect of Steelman running for the Senate! She is what we need in a Senator!

I looked at the primary results map on the Missouri Secretary of State website between Steelman and Hulshof.

Steelman did very well in most areas of the state: she took most of southwest Missouri (including Springfield), St. Louis city, most of the Kansas City metropolitan area (including the city) and other parts of the state.

The primary race was very close. She lost by like only 14,000 votes. The only reason Hulshof won was because of the St. Louis suburbs, northeast Missouri and southeast Missouri.

We need reform. Steelman is the same type of candidate that Palin is. We need her and we need her badly. I don’t want a clone of Claire McCaskill as our next senator.

There are rumors that Robin Carnahan will be running on the Democratic side. We don’t need another Carnahan either.

I think (and hope) Steelman will do well against Carnahan.


6 posted on 01/08/2009 5:04:30 PM PST by wk4bush2004 (SARAH PALIN, 2012!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

geez, another GOP Senator taking the long walk. No wonder these guys can’t win a majority...


7 posted on 01/08/2009 5:05:35 PM PST by bpjam (GOP is 3 - 0 in elections after Nov 4th. You Can Smell the Rally !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Good, and she won in a statewide election. That’s a good thing.


8 posted on 01/08/2009 5:19:58 PM PST by MSF BU (++)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2161169/post


9 posted on 01/08/2009 5:32:41 PM PST by Josh Painter ("She's being treated the way she is because she is effective." - Rush, on Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Yep, the trial lawyers’ best friend on the Republican side is good old Sarah. Just get her nominated, much like McCain, and the big supporters from across the aisle will vote for a real Democrat, not just a trial-lawyer sell-out. The serious conservatives know the difference, ergo her loss to Hulshof last summer. She’s a divisive trouble-maker and a guarantee that Robin Carnahan is the next senator from Missouri.


10 posted on 01/08/2009 5:48:19 PM PST by MHT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

The link doesn’t work.


11 posted on 01/08/2009 5:53:17 PM PST by Clintonfatigued (If greed is a virtue, than corporate socialism is conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MHT

“The serious conservatives know the difference”

I think us “serious conservatives” in Missouri are sick and tired of the corruption, bribing and scandals that have plagued the state GOP.

Steelman is a “Sarah Palin-type” conservative. We need her in office. Just because the state GOP leadership hates her, doesn’t mean that the people do.

As I said in a previous post: during the primary she got so much support from the Springfield and Kansas City areas and also won the city of St. Louis. She is very popular.

It would be foolish to nominate Hulshof for the Senate race. He lost big time in the governor’s race.

We need a “new breed of conservative Republicans,” so to speak, and that includes people like Palin and Steelman.


12 posted on 01/08/2009 6:23:41 PM PST by wk4bush2004 (SARAH PALIN, 2012!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

http://www.news-leader.com/article/20090108/BLOGS09/90108038

“Kinder chides Steelman for taking ‘pot-shots’ at Bond”

Sarah is a good name for a Republican obviously.


13 posted on 01/09/2009 2:13:12 AM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wk4bush2004

Hulshof’s loss to Nixon precludes his nomination. Steelman is an friend of the trial lawyers. They love her and will spend money to see her nominated—and watch her lose to their first choice, a Democrat. She’s no Sarah Palin. If Sarah Steelman were a Sarah Palin clone, I would lose ALL respect for Sarah Palin.


14 posted on 01/11/2009 6:57:53 PM PST by MHT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson