Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hoffman will stay in congressional race (NY alert)
The Press Republican ^ | September 23, 2010 | Joe LoTemplio

Posted on 09/23/2010 6:27:40 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued

However, the split among Republicans and Conservatives last year was seen as a major factor in Owens’s win, which marked the first time a Democrat had won the seat since 1852.

‘OLD DREAM’

Some fear that Hoffman’s intention to stay in the race now will cause another split and give Owens victory again.

“Personally, I am very disappointed in Doug Hoffman’s decision,” Mark L. Barie, chairman of the Upstate New York Tea Party, said today.

UNYTEA had endorsed Hoffman in the Republican primary, but members are being polled to see what their next move will be.

“I thought it would be best, not only for the 23rd District but for the country and the Tea Party, if he (Hoffman) stopped his campaign,” Barie said.

“He has no money, he has no campaign, and I think he is living an old dream from last year, and it is not going to happen again.”

Clinton County Republican Party Chairman Donald Lee also said Hoffman should drop out.

“I would issue a call for him (Hoffman) to drop out right now. It’s the only ethical thing to do,” Lee said.

(Excerpt) Read more at pressrepublican.com ...


TOPICS: New York; Campaign News; U.S. Congress
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 09/23/2010 6:27:41 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem; AuH2ORepublican; Impy; fieldmarshaldj; InterceptPoint; Behind Liberal Lines; ...

This is one case where the losing Republican definitely helps the DemocRAT. If Doug Hoffman refuses to withdraw, he should be ingored by Republicans and conservatives from this point forward.


2 posted on 09/23/2010 6:29:53 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Obama's more worried about Israelis building houses than he is about Islamists building atomic bombs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
This is what an unrealistic big hope and dream do to you. He became a conservative celebrity despite the fact he was not a good campaigner. People supported him not because they liked him, but simply because he was not Scozzafava.

I had a similar concern regarding O'Donnell, but I see that she's actually a good campaigner.

3 posted on 09/23/2010 6:34:06 PM PDT by paudio (How could you be an open-minded person if you are a liberal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Hard to believe the elections are barely more than a month away. Wow.... Where did the year go?? .....


4 posted on 09/23/2010 6:39:02 PM PDT by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paudio

Hoffman never really recovered from the damage ALG’s Dan Tripp did to him last time around. Tripp’s out-of-control rages and divisive behavior destroyed Hoffman’s momentum and assured the poor guy could never mend his fences. Tragic situation. If Tripp shows up in Delaware, COD ought to throw a curse on him and turn him into a sober frog.


5 posted on 09/23/2010 6:44:37 PM PDT by hampdenkid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KoRn

Hopefully, on November 2, we’ll be partying hearty as we ask that question. There will be a lot of work to do after the celebrating is over.


6 posted on 09/23/2010 6:44:37 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Obama's more worried about Israelis building houses than he is about Islamists building atomic bombs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: campaignPete R-CT

What say you about these developments? I know you were rooting for Hoffman.


7 posted on 09/23/2010 6:47:41 PM PDT by randita (Visit keyhouseraces.com to find GOP House candidates who need your support to knock off a DEM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Hoffman proves he is as stupid as he always seemed.


8 posted on 09/23/2010 6:47:46 PM PDT by montag813 (http://www.facebook.com/StandWithArizona)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Yes, this is the type of thing of which I was thinking when I posted this about conservatives encouraging Castle’s potential write-in bid:

“Even if this could actually improve the GOP odds of winning in this particular instance, I do not think it is a good idea *ever* to encourage primary losers to run as write-ins. We hold primaries for a reason, and if RINOs start pulling Murkowskis every time they lose a primary we’ll end up with the RINOs holding us hostage (”vote for the RINO in the primary or he’ll run as a write-in and split the Republican vote”). We can’t lose the forest for the trees here.”

In this case, Hoffman isn’t a RINO—he’s actually more conservative than Doheny, the GOP primary winner (and, FYI, I supported him over Doheny)—but if Republicans in the district chose Doheny over him in a fair primary (in which Hoffman actually outspent Doheny, BTW), he should respect the district’s Republican voters and not make a run that will only result in the Democrat getting reelected. Hoffman would, in a way, become Dede Scozzafava.


9 posted on 09/23/2010 6:51:28 PM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

The person running as the Republican isn’t a conservative on every issue but is more conservative then the one they tried to run last time. That person was also selected fairly.

Hoffman won’t receive support from conservatives this time.


10 posted on 09/23/2010 6:51:51 PM PDT by Soul Seeker (“I was there when we had the numbers, but didn’t have the principles.”---Jim DeMint)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

All Republican candidates need to sign a legally binding “sore loser” agreement stating that if they lose their primary, they will not seek a third party or write in campaign. This crap needs to stop.


11 posted on 09/23/2010 6:55:44 PM PDT by festusbanjo (The Tea Party is what the Republicans used to be, the Democrats are what the Soviets used to be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Hoffman should sit down and shut up.


12 posted on 09/23/2010 6:59:15 PM PDT by Ronin (If it were not so gruesomely malevolent, Islam would just be silly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

In 2008, an insurgency run against a left-wing “Republican” was needed.

In 2010, an insurgency run against a reasonably conservative Republican is not.

It’s times like this that third parties definitely show their value for getting liberal Democrats elected.


13 posted on 09/23/2010 6:59:43 PM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (is a Jim DeMint Republican. You might say he's a funDeMintalist conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: paudio

“This is what an unrealistic big hope and dream do to you. He became a conservative celebrity despite the fact he was not a good campaigner. People supported him not because they liked him, but simply because he was not Scozzafava.

I had a similar concern regarding O’Donnell, but I see that she’s actually a good campaigner. “

But alas, the situation is more alike than different. O’Donnell may be more personable, but she’s way down in the polls and not getting closer at this point. Even Gillibrand’s opponent is closer pollwise now.

We need good mainstream conservatives who are good candidates, not the difficult choice between long-shot inexperienced/flawed conservatives and careerist RINOs.


14 posted on 09/23/2010 7:21:45 PM PDT by WOSG (OPERATION RESTORE AMERICAN FREEDOM - NOVEMBER, 2010 - DO YOUR PART!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

I fully supported Hoffman last year, but I can’t believe he’s doing this. I understand the GOP candidate may not be “pure”, but in this case he is a LOT better than the demoncrat, Owens. Last year, that could not be said of Dede. Also, Dede did not win a primary vote. She was selected. Hoffman got beat fair and square, regardless of how much he was outspent by. You can’t run a campaign on pennies and prayers and then complain you were outspent by the victor. Last year Hoffman got a lot of support from Palin, the Tea Party, and others. This year, he will be on his own. He will absolutely come in 3rd place (or worse) if he does really run. He had a real chance to win last year. This year, he doesn’t. Last year he could say it doesn’t matter if Dede or Owens win, they are both the same. He can’t say that this year. He did the righteous thing last year by running. This time, he needs to do the righteous thing and NOT run.


15 posted on 09/23/2010 7:58:42 PM PDT by GLDNGUN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Hoffman: EGOManiac


16 posted on 09/23/2010 8:06:31 PM PDT by JSDude1 (Battle Ground Vermont..if we make Leahy a toss-up then all Dems are in trouble..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Good. The Democrat and the Republican think it’s okay to kill babies.


17 posted on 09/23/2010 8:08:31 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (Arbitrary power is most easily established on the ruins of liberty abused to licentiousness. -GW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

“If Doug Hoffman refuses to withdraw, he should be ingored by Republicans and conservatives from this point forward.”

If the Repubs take the congress, Hoffman’s district will not get back what they send to Washington. And the Republican party will let the people know.


18 posted on 09/23/2010 8:08:42 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Remember March 23, 1775. Remember March 23, 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

I’m not thrilled with this. I supported Hoffman in the primary. But Matt Doheny will support some pro-life legislation and pro-lifers will make big gains elsewhere.


19 posted on 09/23/2010 8:21:17 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Obama's more worried about Israelis building houses than he is about Islamists building atomic bombs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: randita; Clintonfatigued; EternalVigilance

most of us were doing more than rooting. Campaigning.

Doheny ran a nasty, scorched earth campaign against Hoffman. So as he tries to consolidate GOP support around himself, he should not expect much support from Hoffman supporters.

Who did Doheny vote for last NOV between Owens and Hoffman? There is your answer.

Whoever wins this seat and holds it through redistricting will keep it for a long time. The fact that it is a GOP seat ... combined with imminent redistricting (with NY losing 2 seats) explains why nobody is particularly concerned with Owens. That is why the Dedes & Doheny’s of the district supported Owens last NOV.

The mad scramble up there will continue in the new districts in ‘12.


20 posted on 09/23/2010 8:48:30 PM PDT by campaignPete R-CT ("pray without ceasing" - Paul of Tarsus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
its more than just the rinos isn't it....its even the conservative pubs that can't seem to understand the enormity of this years elections....

we need to win as many seats as we can....and after the primaries, it should be all engines on go...

I can't say just what I feel about these ARROGANT,EGOTISTICAL,and UNETHICAL bottom dwellers such as Hoffman, and Murkowski and Lazio and even Castle, who may or may not run....

A POX ON THEM!

21 posted on 09/23/2010 10:17:26 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: festusbanjo
I wrote that the other day...and the way to enforce is thru million dollar fines plus that trader candidate has to repay the party every cent .....

we could just be like the dims and break knee caps...(joke)

22 posted on 09/23/2010 10:21:43 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
there was no choice in Delaware...Castle was no conservative and barely a republican....

after the primaries it is different...you support who the people voted for...

23 posted on 09/23/2010 10:25:14 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

I don’t support those who think it’s okay to kill babies.


24 posted on 09/24/2010 4:56:10 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Arbitrary power is most easily established on the ruins of liberty abused to licentiousness. -GW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Sounds like Hoffman is pulling a Murkowski..... Sore losers need to get over themselves.


25 posted on 09/24/2010 5:58:28 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cherry; Clintonfatigued; AuH2ORepublican; fieldmarshaldj

Lazio better not run on a third party line. We have a real shot to upset another Cuomo.


26 posted on 09/24/2010 5:16:25 PM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker

how can we make sure that our guy wins?


27 posted on 09/24/2010 6:15:22 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson