Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tea Party Ponders Opposing Expected Pa. Speaker
BillLawrenceOnline.Com ^ | 11-22-10

Posted on 11/22/2010 12:50:40 PM PST by Tribune7

Rep. Sam Smith of the 66th District got the nod to be Speaker of the Pennsylvania House at a closed door meeting of the soon-to-be-in-control Republican caucus on Nov. 9 but the official vote comes Jan. 4 and it will be done in the open.

Bob Guzzardi of LibertyIndex.Com notes that if all Democrats and 11 Republicans vote against Smith, he will not get the job.

Smith was the man who submitted the infamous 2005 legislative pay-raise bill.

To his credit, though, he voted against the recently passed Gen Theft Pension Bailout Bill.

(snip)

The state's Tea Party movement is pondering a phone-bank crusade aimed at newly elected representatives encouraging them to vote against Smith, and other old guard Republicans tapped for top posts.

(Excerpt) Read more at BillLawrenceOnline.Com ...


TOPICS: Pennsylvania; Issues; State and Local
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 11/22/2010 12:50:49 PM PST by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle; brityank; Physicist; WhyisaTexasgirlinPA; GOPJ; abner; baseballmom; Mo1; Ciexyz; ...

What all do you think of Sam Smith?

Hack or not?

I think Dan said he was good on 2A.


2 posted on 11/22/2010 12:52:51 PM PST by Tribune7 (The Democrat Party is not a political organization but a religious cult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7
I've always been a bit puzzled about the level of outrage generated by the pay raise bill.

The PA Legislature can waste billions with the best of them, but let them pass a pay raise that costs a few million and watch out.

Seems people should also pay attention to the larger picture as well.

3 posted on 11/22/2010 1:10:08 PM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
I've always been a bit puzzled about the level of outrage generated by the pay raise bill.

I know. I think it's like proverbial straw on the camel's back.

But if that's what it took to get people ticked I'll take it.

4 posted on 11/22/2010 1:15:11 PM PST by Tribune7 (The Democrat Party is not a political organization but a religious cult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7; dirtboy

I couldn’t agree with dirtboy more.

Sam was a great leader during the Castle Doctrine votes. He used a parliamentary maneuver called “moving the previous question” that stopped all debate.

He’s shown he’s not afraid to play politics with Dems to move his agenda. He has my vote of confidence.


5 posted on 11/22/2010 1:26:24 PM PST by Dan Nunn (Support the NRA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dan Nunn

And Guzzardi likes to think he speaks for the Tea Party. He doesn’t, he’s just one voice among many.


6 posted on 11/22/2010 1:29:29 PM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7
On the NRA-PVF's site for 2010 elections, district 66, they rate Sam Smith not just an A, but an A+. This means Sam is:

A legislator with not only an excellent voting record on all critical NRA issues, but who has also made a vigorous effort to promote and defend the Second Amendment.

We could do a lot worse.

7 posted on 11/22/2010 1:29:38 PM PST by Dan Nunn (Support the NRA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dan Nunn

Heck, Rohrer voted for both the pay raise AND the 2001 pension bill, but that didn’t stop conservatives from supporting him.


8 posted on 11/22/2010 1:32:50 PM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Is this the same Bob Guzzardi that, in 2006, donated to Bryan Lentz' campaign?

I'm asking because I sincerely do not know. And if it were true, where he gets off saying he represents limited government conservatives.

9 posted on 11/22/2010 1:36:03 PM PST by Dan Nunn (Support the NRA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dan Nunn
Heck, on that link Guzzardi says he donated to state rep Rohrer in 2006 - AFTER Rohrer voted for the pay increase.

But now it's a big deal that Smith voted for it?

Guzzardi IMO is just trying to claw his way to the front of the Tea Party parade here.

10 posted on 11/22/2010 1:38:42 PM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Guzzardi IMO is just trying to claw his way to the front of the Tea Party parade here.

Bingo. Opportunists come in all political colors.

11 posted on 11/22/2010 1:40:11 PM PST by Dan Nunn (Support the NRA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Dan Nunn
I'm asking because I sincerely do not know.

It's the same Bob Guzzardi.

12 posted on 11/22/2010 1:41:14 PM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy; Dan Nunn
Sam R was big-time against the bailout though. Of course, Sam S looks OK on that too.

Anyone know what Metcalfe's beef is? Is it just that he wants to be the boss?

13 posted on 11/22/2010 3:21:29 PM PST by Tribune7 (The Democrat Party is not a political organization but a religious cult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dan Nunn
Is this the same Bob Guzzardi that, in 2006, donated to Bryan Lentz' campaign?

Lentz had convinced a lot of people he was more conservative than he was, while Tom Gannon, who was the incumbent and who is a true conservative and is some I happen to like quite a bit, voted for the pay raise (and never acted like he was sorry). He also upset a lot of conservatives for being strongly on the side of the trial lawyers in the med-mal battle.

I know a lot of conservatives who were against Tom. Unfair and unwise, maybe, but that's how it was.

14 posted on 11/22/2010 3:36:29 PM PST by Tribune7 (The Democrat Party is not a political organization but a religious cult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy; Tribune7
I've always been a bit puzzled about the level of outrage generated by the pay raise bill.

If I recall, it wasn't the bill itself that raised the ire of most of us, but the manner in which Fast Eddie and his thieving crew implemented it before it was legally available. Yes - I include the RINOs along with the Dems in that charge.

I like what I know of Daryl Metcalfe, and am on his Email distro, as Lentz don't talk much to us hoi-poloi!

Thanks for the ping, Trib.

15 posted on 11/22/2010 7:07:33 PM PST by brityank (The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: brityank
as Lentz don't talk much to us hoi-poloi!

And now he doesn't really have to :-)

16 posted on 11/22/2010 8:27:10 PM PST by Tribune7 (The Democrat Party is not a political organization but a religious cult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7

Yup - and I no longer get any trash from Sestak either. Glad to see them both unelected!

Wonder where Sestak is going to be installed by Obummer - somewhere in Gates crew I’d bet, if not his replacement. Operationally, I think the Navy is struggling now; with him anywhere in the chain it will only get worse.


17 posted on 11/22/2010 9:13:30 PM PST by brityank (The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: brityank
somewhere in Gates crew I’d bet, if not his replacement.

That would almost make me wish he'd won.

18 posted on 11/22/2010 9:21:49 PM PST by Tribune7 (The Democrat Party is not a political organization but a religious cult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Unfortunately, he's selectively biased.

"Guzzardi IMO is just trying to claw his way to the front of the Tea Party parade here."

Along with others, and not just in this instance.

19 posted on 11/22/2010 10:34:42 PM PST by TAdams8591
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TAdams8591

In 2008 PA passed what would become ACT 129 of 2008 - nickname Pennsylvania Cap and Trade.

This bill mandates the utility companies decrease their output by 1% starting in May 2011, 3% in 2013 and finally reaching %5 a couple years later. It also includes smart meters in homes. It FORCES the consumer to conserve or pay more. If the company doesn’t reduce the output they will be fined 1 million dollars which of course will be passed on to the consumer. This also calls for sequestration of CO2.

This was passed in October of 2008 at the height of the Presidential election and before Climategate. But I am told there are still some legislators who believe in global warming. Only 7 Republicans voted against this.

This is a job killer and will affect oil drilling and coal in PA.

Sam Smith voted for this and when I spoke to him at State Committee in September 2010 he told me there was nothing wrong with the bill.

It takes away our liberty Sam and you don’t see anything wrong with that?!!!!


20 posted on 11/27/2010 3:48:49 PM PST by mombrown1 (PA Coordinatior SAS The Second Amendment is the reset button for the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mombrown1
I left a short message for you on the PA state board
21 posted on 11/27/2010 5:37:11 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: mombrown1

Agree with your take on this and thanks for the information, mombrown.


22 posted on 11/27/2010 7:42:38 PM PST by TAdams8591
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson