Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palin ruling out Bachmann nod?
The Politico ^ | July 10, 2011 | Jonathan Martin

Posted on 07/10/2011 10:26:39 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Sarah Palin may have been making the case for herself with a Facebook post last night arguing that a president must be "a strong chief executive [who] has been entrusted with real authority in the past and has achieved a proven track record of positive measurable accomplishments."

But she also sounds an awful lot like Tim Pawlenty, whose indictment against Michele Bachmann is that three-term member of Congress gives a good speech but hasn't actually accomplished anything.

Wrote Palin: "Leaders are expected to give good speeches, but leadership is so much more than oratory. Real leadership requires deeds even more than words."

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Campaign News; Parties
KEYWORDS: bachmann; martin4romney; martindirtytrick; martinvspalin; operationleper; palin; pawlenty; politico4obama; politico4romney; politicoflack; politicoprrep; politicovspalin; romney; romneybot4milt; romneydirtytrick; romneyvspalin; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-57 next last
It is Politico so consider the source.
1 posted on 07/10/2011 10:26:54 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Unlike the Rollins-Bachmann diss targeting Gov. Palin,
Politico is stirring up a NOTHING for its preferred
Obama and Romney.

Proof: It was written by Jonathan Martin.

“And The Most Irresponsible Journalist Award Goes to The Politico’s Jonathan Martin!
So tell me, how do you write a “news” story about an organization paying for a speaker when you don’t even know if the organization is paying for the speaker?
Ask “journalist” Jonathan Martin. He knows all about it.
You see, Jonny wrote a piss poor story the other day about how the Iowa Family Policy Center will be paying a large speaker fee if Sarah Palin comes to Iowa to keynote the IFPC’s fall funderaiser.
The only problem is that Jonny has no sources confirming that any exorbitant fee is being charged or paid.
Jonny also got some inside info from David Kochel, who was a top aide to former (and future) presidential candidate, Mitt Romney.
Hey Dave, didn’t I just read a story about how Mitt Romney tried to buy off the Iowa Christian Alliance?
I heard you helped facilitate that little scheme. And somehow you are shocked at the thought of a well-known political figure (who very likely isn’t running for president) getting paid a speaker’s fee for (gasp) a public speaking appearance? ..
and then we’ve got Tim Albrecht quoted. He was the Iowa spokesman for Romney’s 2008 caucus campaign.”
And it always seemed like, whenever the Romney people had rumors they wanted to start about other candidates,
Jonny was their go-to guy to get those rumors in writing in front of a national audience.


"Who's the Palin Leaker from the McCain Campaign?
National Review Online The publication of a Vanity Fair profile of Sarah Palin
appears to have opened old wounds in the McCain campaign.
... the source of the “Diva” leak was Nicolle Wallace’s husband."


Who benefits most from Sanford meltdown? Californian (that's right) Mitt Romney


"Peeking Out From the McCain Wreckage: Mitt Romney"

"Someone's got to say it: IS MITT ROMNEY RESPONSIBLE FOR OBAMA'S VICTORY?"

"Vanity: Team Romney Sabotaged Palin and Continuing to Do So?"

"Romney Supporters Trashing Palin"

"Romney advisors sniping at Palin?"



2 posted on 07/10/2011 10:30:47 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Nothing surpasses the complexity of the human mind. - Leto II: Dar-es-Balat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Sounds more like Palin was taking a hit at Obama but Politico will look for any opportunity to spin it to divide our camps.


3 posted on 07/10/2011 10:31:06 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If she doesn’t run she’ll back the Republican nominee.

Dream on Politico.


4 posted on 07/10/2011 10:31:36 AM PDT by CaptainK (...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

Sarah is so comfortable in her own skin that she has no need to diminsh anyone to raise her in comparrison. Leaders lead, the rest of the clowns look for ways to bring everyone else to the lowest common denominator.


5 posted on 07/10/2011 10:33:46 AM PDT by mazda77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“That doesn’t sound like somebody who will be getting on the Bachmann bandwagon.”

More like she’s about to get in bed with Perry. Bummer, I’d rather she her run.


6 posted on 07/10/2011 10:35:40 AM PDT by BobL (PLEASE READ: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2657811/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobL

7 posted on 07/10/2011 10:39:36 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Nothing surpasses the complexity of the human mind. - Leto II: Dar-es-Balat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Wrote Palin: "Leaders are expected to give good speeches, but leadership is so much more than oratory. Real leadership requires deeds even more than words."

Sounds more like a slam on Urkel.

Or as he is known in the Harry Potter books, He Who Leads From Behind.

8 posted on 07/10/2011 10:43:38 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I have about 500 bookmarks of posts of people saying she's not running to respond to when she declares.

I wonder if they like a nice Chianti with their crow?

9 posted on 07/10/2011 10:44:34 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." - Bertrand de Jouvenel des Ursins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Palin, July 15, announce her candidacy with her movie opening?

Doubt it.

Lots of us do wish she’d either ‘poop’ or get off the pot, tho.


10 posted on 07/10/2011 10:51:50 AM PDT by flowerplough (Bammy: It frustrates me when people talk about government jobs as if somehow those are worth less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
If Perry runs my bet will be on Perry/Palin. This combination will bring back our economy and Palin will put the finish touches on King Obama, the dictator.
11 posted on 07/10/2011 10:55:44 AM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flowerplough
Lots of us do wish she’d either ‘poop’ or get off the pot, tho.

So she should give up her strategic advantage to make it fair for her Democrat and Republican opponents?

How moderate of you.

12 posted on 07/10/2011 11:06:07 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." - Bertrand de Jouvenel des Ursins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

Sarah will NOT be 2nd on any ticket again.

No RINOs (Perry, Romney/Bachmann, etc)

PALIN/West 2012
Bolton SoS


13 posted on 07/10/2011 11:13:12 AM PDT by newfreep (Palin/West 2012 - Bolton: Secy of State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
"Sounds more like Palin was taking a hit at Obama but Politico will look for any opportunity to spin it to divide our camps."


Given the timing, I am not so sure. They came soon after Pawlenty made the same observation. I do not trust Politico, but it is no stretch to assume that the comments were aimed at slowing Bachmann's momentum.
14 posted on 07/10/2011 11:42:34 AM PDT by rob777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: newfreep

Bachmann is certainly not a RINO.

I wonder how long the Palin faithful will hang on to the dream and where they will go if she never enters. Having so much emotionally invested in a non candidate (or two in your case) and having spent so much energy tearing down the actual candidates with childish name calling I suspect you will not be able to walk it back and vote for the eventual nominee. Like a spoiled child on Christmas disappointed by a tree full of gifts because he didn’t get the toy he wanted.


15 posted on 07/10/2011 11:52:38 AM PDT by Jack Black ( Whatever is left of American patriotism is now identical with counter-revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Bachmann has not accomplishing anything because she will not bend over and assume “the position” to the democrats..

Thats why I’m voting for her..

You know like the other candidates, except Caine, have done..
Caines problem is he worked for the federal reserve...
Caine being appointed to the “fed” has ten foot pole marks all over it..

On second thought maybe he(caine) wouldn’t make a good Veep..
In that case I choose........ Ron Paul...
There would be no assassinations.. for sure..


16 posted on 07/10/2011 11:54:47 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe
His name is Cain, Herman Cain.

Your hosepipe hooked up to a bong?

17 posted on 07/10/2011 11:58:42 AM PDT by gov_bean_ counter (JMO but I reserve the right to be wrong...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Logical me; All

“If Perry runs my bet will be on Perry/Palin. This combination will bring back our economy and Palin will put the finish touches on King Obama, the dictator.”

I don’t think so. Sarah has already done the 2nd Banana gig and I don’t think she would do so again. I think that if/when she runs, she we either be the nominee or drop out of the race. I don’t think she would accept a VP slot on the ticket again.

I think Bachman would be willing to be a 2nd Banana in 2012, but not Palin.

I will be glad when Palin does join the race.....I believe she brings excitment and zest (as does Bachman to a lesser extent) and I want to she her run. I don’t know if I will vote for Sarah in the primary, but I will be dissappointed if she doesn’t run.

At this point, I don’t know who I will vote for. Of those currently declared, I “believe” that Bachman is the most morally/socially conservative.....so I am leaning towards her. However, if Sarah comes in and shows herself a clear cut social/moral conservative....I might swing towards her in the primary.


18 posted on 07/10/2011 12:01:09 PM PDT by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Click the Chick

Even this baby owes thousands on the national debt

Give what you can
Or donate monthly
A sponsoring FReeper will give $10 for each new monthly donor

19 posted on 07/10/2011 12:10:26 PM PDT by TheOldLady (FReepmail me to get ON or OFF the ZOT LIGHTNING ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Give up her strategic advantage, or man up, reach down and adjust her jock strap, spit, and wade into the fray? Is Sarah happier playing the coy, cute, hard to get cheerleader on the sidelines? Her silly Holly Dunn act, “When I say no I mean maybe, or maybe I mean yes” begins to grate, and the nuanced advantage of the undeclared, possible candidate being able to sometimes speak out of both sides of her mouth begins to fade. Hayna of no?

Hay


20 posted on 07/10/2011 12:13:23 PM PDT by flowerplough (Bammy: It frustrates me when people talk about government jobs as if somehow those are worth less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Gee Jonathan,

I think she was slamming O’Bama...not Bachmann or any of the other GOP hopefuls.


21 posted on 07/10/2011 12:20:22 PM PDT by hattend (Its a matter of public record that I did not go to Harvard Law School, but I can add. - Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hattend

Yeah, thats how I read it too...


22 posted on 07/10/2011 12:24:03 PM PDT by cmsgop ( The left always accuses the right for the sins of the left. from FReeper Just Lori, RIP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: All

They are just trying to create a cat fight. No fight, because it is NO CONTEST. Sarah beats Michele hands down.


23 posted on 07/10/2011 12:26:46 PM PDT by LuvFreeRepublic (Support our military or leave. I will help you pack BO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: flowerplough
Give up her strategic advantage, or man up, reach down and adjust her jock strap, spit, and wade into the fray?

Ronald Reagan didn't declare until November, 1979.

Would you have advised Ronald Reagan to "man up" in July?

How many successful political campaigns have you managed?

24 posted on 07/10/2011 12:27:55 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." - Bertrand de Jouvenel des Ursins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

Please tell me how Gov. Palin (admittedly not a candidate at this time) has bent over for the democrats.


25 posted on 07/10/2011 12:28:11 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I'll raise $2million for Gov. Sarah Palin. What'll you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: flowerplough
Lots of us do wish she’d either ‘poop’ or get off the pot, tho.

To accommodate your timeline? Your convenience? Your life? Why don't you volunteer to be her campaign manager and work for free?

26 posted on 07/10/2011 12:40:42 PM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn't common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Sounds like Sarah’s talking about Obama, who is the person the Republicans need to defeat.


27 posted on 07/10/2011 12:43:42 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
It is Politico so consider the source.

In this case, FRiend, it is OK. Look at the last sentence of the excerpt again.

Wrote Palin: "Leaders are expected to give good speeches, but leadership is so much more than oratory. Real leadership requires deeds even more than words."

Then reconsider The Undefeated.

Palin is a doer of deeds, not a mere reader of screeds.

It's all good.

Cheers!

28 posted on 07/10/2011 12:45:04 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flowerplough
Bookmarked.
29 posted on 07/10/2011 12:47:06 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: flowerplough
“When I say no I mean maybe, or maybe I mean yes” begins to grate, and the nuanced advantage of the undeclared, possible candidate being able to sometimes speak out of both sides of her mouth begins to fade.

Sarah hasn't said "No", she's only said she hasn't decided. We wouldn't even know that if folks didn't continue to ask her. If she runs, I'll support her, if she doesn't, I'll look more closely at the available candidates before the primary occurs in MA.

30 posted on 07/10/2011 12:48:46 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

[ Please tell me how Gov. Palin (admittedly not a candidate at this time) has bent over for the democrats. ]

Re-read my last post, the one you referenced... I didn’t say that..
I said the opposite of that.. about Bachmann..
But then Palin and Bachmann are on the same page politically..

BOTH are highly conservative.. with few differences.. on major issues..
More importantly they are both supported by the TpCaucus..


31 posted on 07/10/2011 12:57:51 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

When it comes to the possibility of competing with Sarah Palin. The Palin haters like Polutico are truly “Running Scared” that the American people might choose her over Obama.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gN94DOrp5IQ


32 posted on 07/10/2011 1:00:18 PM PDT by Sea Parrot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flowerplough

Your poop in the pot stinks.


33 posted on 07/10/2011 1:02:29 PM PDT by Sea Parrot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Heck with the troublemakers at Politico. In the end, each of these ladies would prefer each other over that flop earred Marxist Obama.


34 posted on 07/10/2011 1:04:19 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flowerplough

Your use before date Palin repartee crapola has expired.


35 posted on 07/10/2011 1:08:17 PM PDT by Sea Parrot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas

Plus, leaders don’t take 2nd banana - it is too frustrating/non-productive. Also, she has invested too much time, energy, and family to take the second spot. She is a winner, not an also-ran.


36 posted on 07/10/2011 1:13:34 PM PDT by GlockLady (Remember when we were taught HOW to think, not WHAT to think? (Author Unknown))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Of course Politico would never even think Palin might have been talking about Obama. Idiots.


37 posted on 07/10/2011 1:32:44 PM PDT by ejdrapes (Can we keep our attacks focused on the real enemy: Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

The MSM so wants a fight between these women and they’re not getting it so they decide to make it up. It’s so obvious who Palin was referring to and it wasn’t any republican running for president.


38 posted on 07/10/2011 1:34:54 PM PDT by ejdrapes (Can we keep our attacks focused on the real enemy: Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: newfreep

“Sarah will NOT be 2nd on any ticket again.

No RINOs (Perry, Romney/Bachmann, etc)

PALIN/West 2012
Bolton SoS”

Amen brother!


39 posted on 07/10/2011 1:47:13 PM PDT by Forty-Niner (Palin/West 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GlockLady; Sola Veritas
"Plus, leaders don’t take 2nd banana - it is too frustrating/non-productive. Also, she has invested too much time, energy, and family to take the second spot. She is a winner, not an also-ran."

Bingo. Sarah has already ran "2nd" and saw what a mess that turned out to be. This time she will be #1.....and win (I do hope she grabs West as VP).

40 posted on 07/10/2011 1:52:27 PM PDT by NoGrayZone ("Islamophobia: The irrational fear of being beheaded." Andrew Klavan of PJTV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas

“.....if Sarah comes in and shows herself a clear cut social/moral conservative....”

for proof see “Trig.” He’s just one example of her walking the walk, that few, if any, can demostrate.


41 posted on 07/10/2011 1:53:44 PM PDT by Forty-Niner (Palin/West 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Forty-Niner; All

“for proof see “Trig.” He’s just one example of her walking the walk, that few, if any, can demostrate.”

It shows that Sarah Palin chose the “life” option for her child. However, it does not mean that she is one that wants the law to protect life. A person could be “pro-choice” and in fact chose to have the child, but not of the thought that others cannot chose to end the child’s life. BTW - I think she IS pro-life, but that is just one thing to consider.

Where does she stand on the homosexual situation? Would she support a constitutional ammendment to define marraige? Would she work to reverse Obama’s repeal of DADT?

Other moral/social issues? How about pledging to ONLY nominate pro-life, pro 2nd Ammendment, pro-heterosexual, etc. Judges? So on.....


42 posted on 07/10/2011 2:21:00 PM PDT by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum; Cobra64; Sea Parrot

Perhaps you, EPB, and you other two “My Sarah, right or wrong, but still my Sarah” pilers on, and Sarah, could get John Kerry to explain, in intricate, double-directed, self-absolving detail, the brilliant nuance involved, up to now, in her campaign dance, the Alaska Arizona New BusTourshire Three Step. Comes a time when there’s just too much strategy, as Kerry may have once learned. But along SuziQ’s lines, if The Sarah runs, and if she’s nominated, I’m voting for her. She, or any other Republican, even RomneyCare, is t’e lesser evil, but ‘most any politician who’s big enough to be in the running for Pres is, as a nationally-prominent politician, probably evil. As it is said, anyone who actually wants to be president probably shouldn’t be allowed to be president.


43 posted on 07/10/2011 2:52:55 PM PDT by flowerplough (Bammy: It frustrates me when people talk about government jobs as if somehow those are worth less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: flowerplough

I have no idea what you are saying in that convoluted rant of yours, and I suspect you don’t either.


44 posted on 07/10/2011 2:56:25 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." - Bertrand de Jouvenel des Ursins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas

“It shows that Sarah Palin chose the “life” option for her child. However, it does not mean that she is one that wants the law to protect life.”

For all intents and purposes I stopped reading your post right there.

Idle speculation of this type is disruptive and plays only to plant seeds of doubt, with the consequence of splittin the conservative vote to Obama’s advantage.

Sarah has stated many times as to her belief of the sanctity of life. She has not used any weasel words or by her actions, shown a willingness to see the other side’s viewpoint and support “Choice.”

Wheather or not, she, as President can singlehandedly overturn Roe v Wade, is a false premise, The President does not have that kind of power..... it is up to you, through your elected representatives in Congress, to make that kind of differance.
*************************

“Other moral/social issues? How about pledging to ONLY nominate pro-life, pro 2nd Ammendment, pro-heterosexual, etc. Judges? So on.....”

Don’t put the horse before the cart. Wait until after she is a candidate or then nominee. I sure that agents of the left will be all over these threads trying to make these things an issue within the Conservative and general publics mind in order to sow dissention in her natural base and then on into the mindless middle. None of these suppositions will work with me, I think that I have a pretty good handle on where Sarah is, and I fully trust and support her.


45 posted on 07/10/2011 3:06:24 PM PDT by Forty-Niner (Palin/West 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

no idea what I’m saying?

I suspect you’re just playing dumb, but I’ll simplify:

You tout Sarah’s strategic advantage, but, as Kerry may have learned, sometimes there’s just too much strategy. Inactive politicians (candidates?) on the shelf sometimes have a limited shelf life; for many of us, Sarah’s approaching her limit.


46 posted on 07/10/2011 3:07:29 PM PDT by flowerplough (Bammy: It frustrates me when people talk about government jobs as if somehow those are worth less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: flowerplough
The very fact that you equate Sarah Palin with JFnK eliminates you and your opinions from any serious consideration.
47 posted on 07/10/2011 3:13:16 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." - Bertrand de Jouvenel des Ursins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Logical me
If Perry runs my bet will be on Perry/Palin.

That would be the drill baby drill dream team.

48 posted on 07/10/2011 3:17:21 PM PDT by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: flowerplough
The fact that you don't know that JFnK lost the election because Swift Boat Veterans for Truth called him out because he had not and still has not released his official military record directly to the public says that you don't know jack-$hit.
49 posted on 07/10/2011 3:43:21 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves." - Bertrand de Jouvenel des Ursins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

On Free Republic, you Sarah-philes are sometimes said to be cliquey, inordinately condescending, and dismissive. Any idea why people might seem to occasionally get that impression?


50 posted on 07/10/2011 3:47:03 PM PDT by flowerplough (Bammy: It frustrates me when people talk about government jobs as if somehow those are worth less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson