Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP looks past Sarah Palin for 2012 (More nonsense)
The Politico ^ | October 5, 2011 | Alexander Burns

Posted on 10/05/2011 10:16:14 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Sarah Palin hasn’t closed the door yet on a presidential bid. But few Republicans appear to be waiting for her answer.

Never was it clearer than Tuesday, when Chris Christie’s announcement that he would not run in 2012 prompted a throng of strategists to conclude the Republican field was finally set – never mind Palin’s indecision. A new poll published on the same day revealed that two thirds of Republicans don’t want her to run.

After spending the better part of three years in the center of the national political spotlight, the former vice presidential candidate appears to have worn out the patience of the GOP.

Even as Republicans continue to cast about for new options, only a distinct minority are gazing longingly toward Wasilla – or wherever else Palin is in her secretive, largely apolitical travel schedule.

“She stirs up a lot of conservatives in the base, but I don’t think conservatives are looking to her as a presidential nominee who can save the conservative movement,” said Chuck Muth, the Nevada-based conservative activist....

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Campaign News; Parties; Polls; State and Local
KEYWORDS: palin; palin2012
If former Governor Sarah Palin is so unpopular and unwanted, why does Politico feel the need to write 10 articles a day about her? You don't see them penning a bunch of stories about the declared candidates. Who is telling them to attack Gov. Palin 24/7, along with 98.9% of the rest of the media and left-wing bloggers? And I think I'd take Ralph Reed's advice over Chuck Muth's (whoever the heck that is) on politics.
1 posted on 10/05/2011 10:16:22 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Watching these debates is like watching NFL preseason football.

When Sarah enters everything will change.


2 posted on 10/05/2011 10:20:35 AM PDT by Loud Mime (The Obama voters are dumber than you think, meaner than you can imagine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I know that there are a LOT of GOP voters waiting for her to enter the race. But I also know that more than a few have moved on and settled on a candidate, like Cain.

However, that could all change if she does indeed announce. It’s a pretty fluid primary so far.

The one constant is that Romney continues to hover around 20%. Sarah will only draw from the Cain/Perry and “undecided” support.


3 posted on 10/05/2011 10:20:57 AM PDT by Retired Greyhound (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
She's not running.
4 posted on 10/05/2011 10:23:39 AM PDT by RockinRight (If everyone wants to ride in the wagon, then who is pulling it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
If former Governor Sarah Palin is so unpopular and unwanted, why does Politico feel the need to write 10 articles a day about her?
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
My guess is that it's the same reason there are so many attacks on Rick Perry. Why, you know HE painted that N-word on that rock, dontcha? (sarc)
 
The fix is in. Did you see this thread posted in the middle of the night?
 
We “Do Not Consider Perry a Factor… We Know Who it is Who Will be Our Nominee”
 
RINO's have all but elected Mitt.


5 posted on 10/05/2011 10:25:31 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS! This means liberals AND libertarians (same thing) NO LIBS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Loud Mime

Herman Cain would use the race card on her if she stood in his way. He has shown his colors.

All of a sudden HC would look a lot different to many of you.


6 posted on 10/05/2011 10:25:31 AM PDT by tirednvirginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Loud Mime

Keep dreaming. She’s a reality TV star, not a candidate.


7 posted on 10/05/2011 10:27:07 AM PDT by Astronaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
A new poll published on the same day revealed that two thirds of Republicans don’t want her to run.

What that tells me is that the "Republican" types Sarah put into Alaskan jails (for some reason: SARC) don't like her.

Sarah is the best thing to happen to the Republican party since Lincoln.

8 posted on 10/05/2011 10:29:21 AM PDT by OldNavyVet (One trillion days, at 365 days per year, is 2,739,726,027 years ... almost 3 billion years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

I think Herman Cain knows it too.


9 posted on 10/05/2011 10:31:06 AM PDT by tirednvirginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I’m looking for Palin to either jump in the race herself or endorse somebody.

She will definitely do one or the other, but she will do it on her own timetable.


10 posted on 10/05/2011 10:31:55 AM PDT by samtheman (Palin. In your heart you know she's right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“the former vice presidential candidate appears to have worn out the patience of the GOP.”

The don’t get it,, it’s not up to her to placate the vanity of the GOP. It’s up to the GOP to worry about not wearing out our patience.

The GOP assumes that i as a conservative, will always vote for their candidate no matter how they knowingly offend me, yet, they are never expected to support the conservative that might not be their dream candidate,
The establishment has had their way since 1988,,, no more. At least for me. And no, throwing me a bone of conservative veep to sit quietly in the corner, will not get me into the GOP camp. It’s power or nothing,,,


11 posted on 10/05/2011 10:32:07 AM PDT by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Flip the question, if she is so popular the why doesn’t she jump in now and run away with the nomination?

Hint: She knows she can’t win, so she ain’t running.


12 posted on 10/05/2011 10:33:48 AM PDT by tatown (The only job Obama's ever created was the one he gave Larry Sinclair.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
two thirds of Republicans don’t want her to run

Not sure about the specific polls they're using, but isn't appx. 1/3 the number of Republicans who have expressed no preference on the existing field? You think there just might be a correlation between those two numbers?

13 posted on 10/05/2011 10:34:42 AM PDT by kevkrom (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Muth also serves on the advisory council of the gay conservative political advocacy group GOProud.

That pretty much is all you need to know about this dude.

14 posted on 10/05/2011 10:36:19 AM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; All
There is actually now a very plausible scenario for Palin to enter, and win the nomination:

1. Let's attribute Cain's recent surge in the polls to a combination of several factors:
a. He's a good guy, people like him, and he gave a GREAT speech in Florida.
b. He's benefitted from Perry's rapid implosion
c. He's picked up some Bachmann voters..a min-bandwagon effect.
d. Some Palin supporters may have figured she's not running, and gone for Cain

2. Mitt's gone back into 1st place, but without gaining ANY support. If he can't get into the 40's over the next 4-6 weeks...he's finished.

3. Perry has the next month to show that he can turn it around, otherwise he's also done.

4. If Mitt and Perry noth washout, then look for Palin to get in within 4-6 weeks..she would probably immediately be the front runner.

15 posted on 10/05/2011 10:36:39 AM PDT by ken5050 (Cain/Gingrich 2012!!! because sharing a couch with Pelosi is NOT the same as sharing a bed with her)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Astronaut

You know, considering how much she’s done for conservatives, whether you think she should run or not, don’t you think you should have a little more respect? BTW, what reality show is she doing now? I missed it.

Cindie


16 posted on 10/05/2011 10:38:29 AM PDT by gardencatz (Proud mom US Marine! It can't always be someone else's son.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Astronaut

Prepare to be ousted blasphemer! Your conservative credentials are under review!


17 posted on 10/05/2011 10:38:58 AM PDT by Reagan Disciple (Peace through Strength)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The establishment folks who are supporting Romney or Perry have a reason to hope for Palin not to enter.

I continue to be amused by the quoted polls reflecting 60% of Republican voters don't want her to run. Why is it that when Chris Christie had similar polling results, no one used that as a reason he shouldn't run?

60% saying a candidate shouldn't run are likely supporters of another candidate. On the other hand, if there are 40% indicating they would welcome her running, it's safe to say that a large number of those would be Palin supporters, and no one candidate is currently polling over 30%.

Related, so far this election season, we have had four different candidates who were leading in the polls, Romney, Bachmann, Perry, and now Cain. In real-ville, does anyone think the polls are not going to change again?

18 posted on 10/05/2011 10:39:19 AM PDT by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
RINO's have all but elected Mitt.

That's funny. It looks like Perry kicked @$$ in fundraising this quarter. Looks like not everyone is ready to jump on board with the establishment.

19 posted on 10/05/2011 10:40:59 AM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought

You forgot Trump. Remember, he was leading in the polls not that long ago.


20 posted on 10/05/2011 10:42:13 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I'll raise $2million for Gov. Sarah Palin. What'll you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Good Point!


21 posted on 10/05/2011 10:43:57 AM PDT by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Loud Mime

We have primaries in 100 days and when will she enter the race? This is getting ridiculous. People have given every damn excuses for not running. Atleast let us get behind the most conservative in the group and stop Romney. If sarah makes people guess, the conservatives are going to be split and give Romney the nomination


22 posted on 10/05/2011 10:45:37 AM PDT by Ranjit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gardencatz
BTW, what reality show is she doing now?

None, since she skipped the debates...

23 posted on 10/05/2011 10:46:03 AM PDT by gov_bean_ counter ( The Prudential Governor... Have you bought your piece of the Rick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Astronaut
Keep dreaming. She’s a reality TV star, not a candidate.

And a well paid one at that! One million bucks per year from Fox News alone - much better than that dreary job as Governor she left mid term.

24 posted on 10/05/2011 10:47:02 AM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
They know she's inevitable.

They knew it the first time they saw her.

It's why they go insane every time the think of her.

ineluctable

25 posted on 10/05/2011 10:47:16 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them." --Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050

That’s a whole month on October and middle of November. Primaries are in January !


26 posted on 10/05/2011 10:48:32 AM PDT by Ranjit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ranjit

November 13, 1979. Know what happened on that date?


27 posted on 10/05/2011 10:51:13 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I'll raise $2million for Gov. Sarah Palin. What'll you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The rest of the field could make her a lot less of a problem by being better. That they aren’t better (and most of them frankly can’t be) is neither her fault nor her supporters’.


28 posted on 10/05/2011 10:51:45 AM PDT by RichInOC (Palin 2012: The Perfect Storm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ranjit
Atleast let us get behind the most conservative in the group and stop Romney

Agreed. But why do we have to decide right now instead of, oh, say when the filing deadlines arrive?

29 posted on 10/05/2011 11:02:06 AM PDT by kevkrom (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter; gardencatz
BTW, what reality show is she doing now?

None, since she skipped the debates....

LOL. Post of the day!

30 posted on 10/05/2011 11:03:09 AM PDT by Lakeshark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“November 13, 1979. Know what happened on that date?”

Ummm....was that the date Nancy Pelosi had her 37th face lift?

Just kidding....I know it was the day that Ronald Reagan announced his formal intention to run for the GOP nomination.

Only thing different now is the primaries are more “front loaded;” many states that had primaries in the spring now have them in January or February. So some of the deadlines are earlier now than back then.

That being said, I would never under-estimate Sarah Palin.
I wonder if she plays chess?

Sarah Palin and Herman Cain are my favorites. Either one of them would make a fine president.


31 posted on 10/05/2011 11:05:11 AM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (Obama inherited a mild recession from George W. Bush and turned it into a major depression.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

:)


32 posted on 10/05/2011 11:07:02 AM PDT by gov_bean_ counter ( The Prudential Governor... Have you bought your piece of the Rick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Man, the PDSers have spammed this thread!

With that said, the filing deadlines are fast approaching and if she's serious, Sarah needs to SOGOTP soon.

33 posted on 10/05/2011 11:11:50 AM PDT by bassmaner (Hey commies: I am a white male, and I am guilty of NOTHING! Sell your 'white guilt' elsewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

LOL! That gave me a chuckle!

Cindie


34 posted on 10/05/2011 11:12:49 AM PDT by gardencatz (Proud mom US Marine! It can't always be someone else's son.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
There’s a sense, in other words, that Palin’s moment has already passed, whether she knows it or not.
“Sarah Palin can and should have done so much more in the last two years to bolster her credentials, to demonstrate depth, to demonstrate substance as opposed to style,” said former White House press secretary Ari Fleischer. “She had a window and I don’t think she used it wisely.”

The Washington elites are entirely clueless. She's written two best-selling books, helped numerous conservative candidates get elected in 2010, drawn supportive crowds wherever she's gone, and made major addresses to conservative organizations. They believe that because she doesn't have the "good-old-boys" type organization that Romney and now Perry have, she's crippled.

The other conservative candidates have risen and fallen in the polls these past couple of months and it shows how mercurial the Republican field is viewed right now. They (meaning the conservatives) are not decided on a candidate just yet while the elites have settled on Romney. I guess we shall see how it all shakes out in the next couple of weeks.

35 posted on 10/05/2011 11:14:22 AM PDT by CedarDave (My Sarah prediction: Announcing for President between October 12 and 28.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
After spending the better part of three years in the center of the national political spotlight, the former vice presidential candidate appears to have worn out the patience of the GOP.

The GOP are nothing but a bunch of spineless, elitist pigs. They've never supported Sarah Palin, not while she was under attack nor while she was on point attacking the Obama regime. I have no use for the GOP establishment elite. My goal is to defeat them along with their Democrat buddies including Obama.

36 posted on 10/05/2011 11:16:36 AM PDT by upsdriver (to undo the damage the "intellectual elites" have done. . . . . Sarah Palin for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
4. If Mitt and Perry both washout, then look for Palin to get in within 4-6 weeks..she would probably immediately be the front runner.

She doesn't have that long -- the early primaries will require her to declare her candidacy before the end of this month. She has three weeks to do it.

37 posted on 10/05/2011 11:19:30 AM PDT by CedarDave (My Sarah prediction: Announcing for President between October 12 and 28.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Saying she isn’t running isn’t an “attack” on her unless she is actually running. It’s the truth. Right now, she isn’t running. So saying she isn’t running isn’t an attack. Quoting people who say that she isn’t running isn’t an attack.

I am happy that the news media keeps on focusing on her, because she is critical to the conservative movement. We’d all be worse off if the media decided to just ignore her. And even if she announces that she isn’t running, I don’t expect her to go quietly into the night, or to allow the media to ignore her.


38 posted on 10/05/2011 11:41:48 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Retired Greyhound

To support Herman Cain is not to settle, he is an outstanding candidate who will beat Obama.

Palin would lose because far too many hate her with a passion. They would come out in droves just to vote against her.


39 posted on 10/05/2011 11:42:34 AM PDT by Java4Jay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Romney really is getting every break so far. Palin hasn't announced. Perry came in, and he was a solid conservative who could challenge Romney, but because Palin was still out there, her supporters, along with the existing candidate supporters, cut him down viciously, ignoring Romney at the debates to try to clear the field of a conservative. When Perry was finally falling over, the Palin supporters cheered how they had "cleared the way" and "opened the door". But then Cain started rising. And the attacks by all the other candidate supporters started on him as well.

Meanwhile, the one new entrant who might have cut into Romney's base, Christie, keeps announcing that he is NOT running. So Romney has the moderate/left field to himself, while conservatives have multiple major and minor, announced and unannounced, choices, and are stubbornly sticking with their own choices and trashing all the others:

"Bachmann is mean and shrilly, Bachmann attacked Palin, Perry is a racist, Cain supports new taxes, Palin isn't running, Perry supports open borders, Bachmann is crazy and retarded, Cain is a race-baiter, Gingrich spends too much time on the couch with Pelosi, Perry loves muslims, Bachmann never served in an executive position, Cain strongly supported TARP, Palin supported TARP, Perry wrote a note to Hillary about health care, Cain supports affirmative action, Bachmann is unelectable, Perry is a RINO, Cain has no government experience, Gingrich had multiple wives, etc., etc., etc.,"

Romney is the luckiest candidate out there right now. He has money, he has the establishment, and yet he actually got away with attacking PERRY as the establishment, with the help of the other conservative candidates who thought it would help them (and it did Cain, who is now the flavor of the week until the media gets through with him).

40 posted on 10/05/2011 11:50:30 AM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Misunderestimate Sarah Palin. Please.
41 posted on 10/05/2011 11:50:46 AM PDT by McGruff (Vetting - The process of examination and evaluation of a candidate's record.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Astronaut
She’s a reality TV star, not a candidate.

That's odd. I seem to remember Juan McCain picking her to be his candidate for Vice President of the United States. Not Mitt Romney, or Rick Perry or Chris Crispie... I doubt he was watching Reality TV.

42 posted on 10/05/2011 11:55:55 AM PDT by McGruff (Vetting - The process of examination and evaluation of a candidate's record.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Java4Jay

I agree. By “settle”, I merely meant that Cain supporters are conservatives that have found their candidate.

It is quite possible that Palin as the nominee would energize the left in a way that would help Obama.


43 posted on 10/05/2011 11:57:23 AM PDT by Retired Greyhound (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Retired Greyhound
You wrote (brilliantly), "It is quite possible that Palin as the nominee would energize the left in a way that would help Obama."

With the left so filled with hate and always looking for an object upon which to project their bitterness, you may have hit upon the best reason for Sarah to no run and remain a 'celebrity' to campaign with the GOP nominee and House and Senate candidates!

As the filthy SEIU protesters make fools of themselves and pose themselves as enemies of We The People with their mindless protesting, what we in the tea party don't need to do is energize the scum of the earth to rally around barry bassturd for four more years of the misery and destruction he and his masters have planned. The whole fabricated outrage of the leftist scum is orchestrated to divide the nation and drum up mindless outrage in the liberal ranks. Those folks are so stupid already, there is no use helping them in their outrage by running Sarah whom we all believe would work to restore conservative values and principles in the nation and do so openly.

Perhaps stealth renovating is called for during these very barry-divisive times.

44 posted on 10/05/2011 12:10:39 PM PDT by MHGinTN (Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Unless Sarah has a legendary ego (which I don’t believe she does), I think she will recognize this reality and decline to run.


45 posted on 10/05/2011 12:39:34 PM PDT by Retired Greyhound (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

You forgot to mention her televised journey in Alaska with Kate Plus 8 after Palin quit her elected job.

This Palin “Will I? Won’t I?” sideshow is quality entertainment, though.


46 posted on 10/05/2011 12:56:37 PM PDT by Carling (Mitt Romney Signed a Bill that Mandated Taxpayer-funded Abortions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: upsdriver

Palin spent the entire summer attacking the GOP establishment. Expecting them to support her is foolish, and I’m sure Palin doesn’t expect any support.

It’s the GOP voters that she needs to win the nomination, and it’s those voters she doesn’t have right now, according to every poll that includes her in it.


47 posted on 10/05/2011 12:59:02 PM PDT by Carling (Mitt Romney Signed a Bill that Mandated Taxpayer-funded Abortions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
They cite a poll...

In a Washington Post/ABC News poll released this week,

But there is no link to it in the article.

???

Running a search easily takes me to the "analysis."

Here are the kind of Americans that were polled.

Americans by 44 to 21 percent say they're more apt to support a candidate who sees global warming as a problem to be addressed. And by 42 to 25 percent they're more apt to oppose one who favors a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage.

Americans by 35 to 28 percent said they're more likely to oppose than to support a candidate who favors teaching creationism or intelligent design alongside evolution as part of the science curriculum in public schools.

Doesn't sound much like any republicans I know...

Then, on the last page, waaaay down at the very bottom the true nature of the article peeks out...

Christie’s renewed interest – he’d said he would not run, then said he’s reconsidering – garners some support, albeit not a mandate. While, as noted, 42 percent of leaned Republicans would like to see him enter the race, 34 percent would like him to stay out, and 24 percent have no opinion either way.

Christie does best, naturally, among the three in 10 leaned Republicans who are dissatisfied with the current field of candidates. In this group, 22 percent support him for the nomination.

Any way it’s sliced, Christie’s in a better position for a late arrival than is Sarah Palin. Republicans and Republican-leaning independents say by 49 to 35 percent that the more they hear about Palin, the less they like her. And by 2-1, 66 to 31 percent, they’d like her not to enter the race.

Once again I see I am being told who I am supposed to favor.

Back to the actual poll...

Two things here. One, which I do not recall having ever seen before.

The title...

ABC NEWS/WASHINGTON POST POLL: 2012 Election Update
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE AFTER 12:01 a.m. Tuesday, Oct. 4, 2011

Such an interesting date!

Then, when you get to the actual questions there is this...

(questions) 2-17 held for release.

Makes me wonder what was NOT included in the "analysis."

http://www.langerresearch.com/uploads/1128a22012Election.pdf

Finally, who did the poll?

The article said " in the latest ABC News/Washington Post poll."

Did they do it internally?

No. This guy did it.

ABC polling director goes independent, bags ABC as client
2 August 2010 | By Brian Tarran

US— ABC’s “poobah of polling”, polling director Gary Langer, has left the broadcaster to set up his own survey research design, management and analysis business, Langer Research Associates (LRA).

http://www.research-live.com/news/people/abc-polling-director-goes-independent-bags-abc-as- client/4003278.article

Really? Now we have an in-the-bag ABC guy running polls that will be touted as "independent" when the results have a sour smell.

But lets see what is being said about him.

April 26, 2011
Categories: Polls
Belief and opinion


I just recorded a segment of the radio show "To the Point," in which ABC pollster Gary Langer articulated the point I've been trying to make about the polls suggesting huge chunks of the Republican Party "believe" discredited theories about Barack Obama's birth.

"I think these measurements are not really reflecting 'belief' in the true sense of the phrase," he said. "Many people are expressing their opinion rather than an assertion of factual reality. People who don’t like you are going to take an opportunity to send a message.... They’re simply taking advantage of an opportunity to express antipathy toward him."

Ben Smith, http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0411/Belief_and_opinion.html

Apparently, Mr. Langer has been pushing the "discredited theories" mantra.

Then there is peer opinion of him. I looked around, not a lot there, mostly negative.

Gary Langer Hates Robopolls, Probably Because They’re More Accurate Than His Live Interviewer Polls And He’s Apparently Just Jealous, The Poor Thing, So He’s Decided That Accuracy Doesn’t Matter.

Gary Langer, Director of Polling at ABC News, has a problem with what he calls “robopolls” and what we’re going to call interactive voice response, or IVR, polls.

As best I can tell, his root problem is that they’re more accurate than his live interviewer polls, despite using what he considers inferior methodology. But here, let him tell you:...

http://researchrants.wordpress.com/2010/01/28/gary-langer-hates-robopolls-probably-because-theyre-more- accurate-than-his-live-interviewer-polls-and-hes-apparently-just-jealous-the-poor-thing-so-hes-decided-that -accuracy-doesnt-matter/

The rub? It is because Mr. Langer likes to push the results in the direction he wants.

“Lack of respondent selection” is a major bullshit non-issue, brought up time and time again by Langer and his ilk to discredit research that threatens their world. According to them, your poll is unreliable if you don’t start every call by asking to speak to a specific random person — the youngest male, for instance, or the person in the household with the next birthday. There’s absolutely no reason why “robopolls” can’t do this — it’s just another question, for crying out loud — and as far as I know, there’s no evidence that there’s any reason for them to do it, or for anyone else to, other than because Langer says they should.

The additional info there is very revealing as to the inside methods that can produce results according to the clients wishes.

My conclusion? Unchanged.

Americans by 44 to 21 percent say they're more apt to support a candidate who sees global warming as a problem to be addressed. And by 42 to 25 percent they're more apt to oppose one who favors a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage.

Americans by 35 to 28 percent said they're more likely to oppose than to support a candidate who favors teaching creationism or intelligent design alongside evolution as part of the science curriculum in public schools.

Doesn't sound much like any republicans I know...

.

48 posted on 10/05/2011 1:26:17 PM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It Sure is funny that the only person that has been told not to run is Sarah Palin, Not Perry, not Romney, not McCain last time.

No one in the history in American politics has been told not to run as much as this women.

Where are the polls asking people if Romney should run or anyone else?

Just Palin polls.

Why, because as Rush says, they will tell you who they are most afraid of,


49 posted on 10/05/2011 2:55:51 PM PDT by factmart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

Well, we’re BOTH off on that call...(g)


50 posted on 10/05/2011 4:57:23 PM PDT by ken5050 (Cain/Gingrich 2012!!! because sharing a couch with Pelosi is NOT the same as sharing a bed with her)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson