Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can we vote it out here Freepers? Newt/Mitt/Rick/Michele?

Posted on 12/19/2011 7:10:04 AM PST by Milagros

I vote for Newt!

---

* Newt Gingrich?

* Mitt Romney?

* Rick Perry?

* Michele Bachmann?

* Rick Santorum?

* Jon Huntsman?


TOPICS: Iowa; Campaign News
KEYWORDS: 2010elections; iowa; jonhuntsman; michelebachmann; mittromney; newsgingrich; rickperry; ricksantorum; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-136 next last
To: An American!
but I am focused on all the other races...we the people need to take back congress and put real representatives back in there...

This is my current focus as well. Would be a good move for this site to get up and running on laying out the Congressional maps and how best to lend our support to those who WRITE and REFORM the laws.
51 posted on 12/19/2011 7:46:54 AM PST by Eagle of Liberty (Shaking My Head on a daily basis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Milagros
Why is Romney, who is clearly and emphatically is against everything FR clearly says it stands for, even on the list? Seriously, anyone who frequents FR and has therefore seen all the information posted here about Snitt definitely values something else far more than they value the Constitution and even the right to life. Snitt father of RomneyCare which was the prototype for Obamacare, anyone who would vote for the father of Romney care doesn't care about this country. Continuing to pump and babble about a carbon copy of Barry Soetoro is absurd and that's all Snitt is, a carbon copy of what we are trying to get rid of.

Since the democrat fascists lynched Cain the way they've always lynched runaway slaves who flee democrat plantations, I have to go with Newt. Even if Cain had stayed in the running, I would have liked to have seen him pick Newt as VP, so it could be worse.

JMHO

52 posted on 12/19/2011 7:47:58 AM PST by Rashputin (Obama stark, raving, mad, and even his security people know it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chickensoup
They all are Republicans. There are no conservatives or Constitutionalists.

That's why I asked if there were any republicans, rather than asking if there were any Republicans.

53 posted on 12/19/2011 7:48:13 AM PST by tacticalogic (e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Milagros

I will vote for which ever one gets the nomination, I hate the all or nothing mentality of some here. if they don’t get exactly what they want they will sit it out, that is the exact reason the country is where it is today because the left never says all or nothing they take every inch they can every time they can and over the last 40 50 years we have been creeping and creeping towards where we are today, I will vote for any one of them because we cannot take another four years of obama period


54 posted on 12/19/2011 7:49:14 AM PST by edzo4 (You call us the 'Party Of No', I call us the resistance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
ANY, and every, (R) beats Øbozo with any reasonable effort by our conservative majority.
55 posted on 12/19/2011 7:50:02 AM PST by harpu ( "...it's better to be hated for who you are than loved for someone you're not!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: An American!

“but I am focused on all the other races...we the people need to take back congress and put real representatives back in there..”

Agree AA. We may not have much influence over who gets chosen anyway, depending on where we live and how many electoral votes our state has.

Our attention should be on Congressional races, Governorships and if we are going to worry about another Bam election, let’s be seriously concerned about potential appointments to the Supremes if any judges retire. Got Elena Kagen?


56 posted on 12/19/2011 7:50:20 AM PST by Mountain Mary ("My core is not up for grabs". El Rushbo 12/06/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Milagros

The one with the “b*lls” to take on Obomba and his backers...


57 posted on 12/19/2011 7:50:27 AM PST by goodnesswins (Banning Christmas (and Christmas decorations) is something that commies do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Milagros

Newt, with some uncertainty as well . Is somebody going to tally this up?


58 posted on 12/19/2011 7:51:12 AM PST by sonic109 (no compromise with Marxist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thesaleboat

I think it was that Gov. Nathan Deal and 60 Georgia Republican elected officials officially endorsed him. But, he wasn’t in Atlanta for the announcement.


59 posted on 12/19/2011 8:00:14 AM PST by LBG11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: sonic109

1 Romney

2 Santorum

3 Perry

4 Bachmann

5 Gingrich

1000 Paul


60 posted on 12/19/2011 8:00:14 AM PST by nolib1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: edzo4
I will vote for which ever one gets the nomination, I hate the all or nothing mentality of some here. if they don’t get exactly what they want they will sit it out, that is the exact reason the country is where it is today because the left never says all or nothing they take every inch they can every time they can and over the last 40 50 years we have been creeping and creeping towards where we are today, I will vote for any one of them because we cannot take another four years of obama period.

Four more years of Obama will end in the destruction of the constitutional republic, or war. If we keep alternating Democrates and RINO's it will end the same, it will just take a little longer.

61 posted on 12/19/2011 8:02:19 AM PST by tacticalogic (e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

Santorum. With no uncertainty.


62 posted on 12/19/2011 8:05:47 AM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 14erClimb

Word up.


63 posted on 12/19/2011 8:06:35 AM PST by L,TOWM (Once you see that it is all Kabuki Theater, you are free to quit wasting your time on politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Milagros

Don’t like it, but bozo will probably win another 4 years. We need to concentrate on the SENATE. That way numnutz can’t get most lib crap through.


64 posted on 12/19/2011 8:07:20 AM PST by Pit1 (Omama is the chief gun-runner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bcsco

The only problem with holding your nose is that it is impossible to breathe then, considering what they are shoving down your throat at the same time...


65 posted on 12/19/2011 8:09:39 AM PST by L,TOWM (Once you see that it is all Kabuki Theater, you are free to quit wasting your time on politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Milagros

Michele Bachmann.


66 posted on 12/19/2011 8:11:45 AM PST by mbynack (Retired USAF SMSgt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Milagros

Jim Robinson


67 posted on 12/19/2011 8:15:08 AM PST by isthisnickcool (Sharia? No thanks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: L,TOWM

Not when it’s only for a short period of time, like when, marking the election ballot.


68 posted on 12/19/2011 8:16:19 AM PST by bcsco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Milagros

Eisenhower. I like Ike......


69 posted on 12/19/2011 8:16:40 AM PST by HereInTheHeartland (I love how the FR spellchecker doesn't recognize the word "Obama")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Milagros
The only one I could not possibly vote for is Ron-Paul Ahmanutjob.

Huntsman does nothing for me. No connection there at all.

All the rest--Romney, Perry, Gingrich, Santorum, and Bachmann--have their good points and their bad points. I am looking for the best combination of conservatism, competence, and electability. Each of the five candidates is strong in one or two of those areas but weak in one or two also. Any of them would be far preferable to Obama.

The Missouri primary is February 7, so there may be some thinning of the herd by then. Also, this time, the Missouri delegates will be chosen by caucus, and our primary is just a popularity contest.

70 posted on 12/19/2011 8:16:59 AM PST by Charles Henrickson (Constitutional conservative Republican who wants to win)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Milagros

AGAINST Obama.

Beyond that I’ll see whose available when the Primary reaches my state.


71 posted on 12/19/2011 8:17:20 AM PST by Little Ray (FOR the best Conservative in the Primary; AGAINST Obama in the General.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Milagros

I vote for Scott Walker. He is the only conservative doing the job real conservatives do.


72 posted on 12/19/2011 8:18:00 AM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Milagros

Newt at this late juncture rather than Mitt.


73 posted on 12/19/2011 8:19:46 AM PST by wardaddy (Michelle, Sarah, Perry now Newt over Mitt.....that is how I've seen it and it's where we are)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Milagros
I'd like to go for Newt, but I can forget gaurdasil easier than I can forget this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qi6n_-wB154

Perry or Bachman.

74 posted on 12/19/2011 8:20:38 AM PST by KittenClaws (A closed mouth gathers no foot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Milagros

Rick Perry


75 posted on 12/19/2011 8:23:47 AM PST by Essie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

You purists, will end up giving us Romney lol.

...and then you all will sit back and moan and groan about RINOs...

We deserve Romney for being so stupid.


76 posted on 12/19/2011 8:24:50 AM PST by rbmillerjr (Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Milagros

none of the above

however, I will hold my nose, and vote for whomever the Republican nominee is .... it has come down to getting Obama out.


77 posted on 12/19/2011 8:32:50 AM PST by nuconvert ( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nolib1776

Are you drunk or something?


78 posted on 12/19/2011 8:47:58 AM PST by CainConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Rashputin

Amen.


79 posted on 12/19/2011 8:51:00 AM PST by CainConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Milagros

Newt


80 posted on 12/19/2011 8:54:29 AM PST by Vision ("Did I not say to you that if you would believe, you would see the glory of God?" John 11:40)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Milagros

Ron Paul. the only one left that recognizes Government is the problem not the solution.


81 posted on 12/19/2011 8:58:28 AM PST by MNJohnnie (Giving more money to DC to fix the Debt is like giving free drugs to addicts think it will cure them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Milagros

NONE OF THE ABOVE !


82 posted on 12/19/2011 9:11:20 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (If Newt Gingrich is a Reliable Conservative, Joe Biden is a member of MENSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Milagros

Governor Rick Perry


83 posted on 12/19/2011 9:15:57 AM PST by potlatch (*snip*~ Having the right to be angry does not give one the right to be cruel. ~*snip*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

Paul or none of the above


84 posted on 12/19/2011 9:16:05 AM PST by 09Patriot (your freedom to be you, includes my freedom to be from you.--Wilkow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

so then I might as well just give up now because the outcome is inevitable right? good thing we didn’t have the attitude when we landed at normandy that if we didnt take france all at once we might as well not even try...
the left has gotten where they are inch by inch and if we have to push it back inch by inch I am willing to fight, I am not going to be a spoiled brat and not participate if I dont get everything I want all at once


85 posted on 12/19/2011 9:18:10 AM PST by edzo4 (You call us the 'Party Of No', I call us the resistance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Milagros

Michele.


86 posted on 12/19/2011 9:22:32 AM PST by SharpRightTurn ( White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PieterCasparzen

IMHO...

1 Michele Bachmann
2 Rick Santorum

agree. . .i might have been for newt except he supported TARP, single payer, and global warming.


87 posted on 12/19/2011 9:26:09 AM PST by Captain Steve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Milagros

Michele Bachmann


88 posted on 12/19/2011 9:29:01 AM PST by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Milagros

Here is the way I see it...

mcromney... communist lite

mcgrinchrich... socialist lite

mcperry... the bushes 4th term

bachman... mcromneys puppet

ron paul... enough said

santorum... who?????

huntsman... more of a lib than fubo

with this in mind, daffy duck gets my vote... the tea party gets the house and senate votes from me..


89 posted on 12/19/2011 9:32:00 AM PST by joe fonebone (Project Gunwalker, this will make watergate look like the warm up band......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edzo4
so then I might as well just give up now because the outcome is inevitable right? good thing we didn’t have the attitude when we landed at normandy that if we didnt take france all at once we might as well not even try... the left has gotten where they are inch by inch and if we have to push it back inch by inch I am willing to fight, I am not going to be a spoiled brat and not participate if I dont get everything I want all at once

Are we really "pushing back", or just stopping the advance temporarily, until the next Democrat administration or congressional majority comes along? What does the history of the last 30 years tell you? Are we really pushing them back by supporting the Republican Party, or are we just slowing the advance?

90 posted on 12/19/2011 9:34:48 AM PST by tacticalogic (e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone

Perry is not Bush lite,that is inaccurate.Neither Bush EVER spoke ill of the UN.Gingrich has way too many flip flops.

http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2011/08/11/gingrich_was_for_the_united_nations_before_he_was_against_it


91 posted on 12/19/2011 9:37:00 AM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
Are we really "pushing back", or just stopping the advance temporarily

well it will depend on who the nominee is whether we are pushing back or stalling, but either is better than surrender

92 posted on 12/19/2011 9:39:24 AM PST by edzo4 (You call us the 'Party Of No', I call us the resistance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: edzo4
well it will depend on who the nominee is whether we are pushing back or stalling, but either is better than surrender

Which nominee do you think is going to "push back"? What's their plan to do it?

93 posted on 12/19/2011 9:41:29 AM PST by tacticalogic (e)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

Dittos on your picks.


94 posted on 12/19/2011 9:41:31 AM PST by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Captain Steve
Rick Santorum in 2020, not 2012. In 2012 we need someone who knows how to knife fight and beat the bastards at their own game. Santorum isn't capable of doing that, may never be capable of it, and will be far better off if he never has to worry about it. By 2020 either things will have changed enough that dirty pool won't be the order of the day or we'll already be down the tubes and the President will be nothing but a figurehead anyway with the Fascist Democrat party running everything through regulators and unconstitutional agencies.

The Democrat party has always wanted rule by consensus of the nobility, not a single King they might have to wrestle with. The only reason they want a democrat President is to get from where we are to where they want to be. When they think they've arrived at their destination, having any chump who can read a teleprompter and spew the right lies is fine with them. That's why they let Barry have the Presidency, they thought they had finally arrived and would be able to once and for all establish single party rule with a democrat fascist nobility picking who would have which offices and for how long.

Euthanasia and limiting Capitalism to the portions of the economy that please the nobility has been what they've wanted ever since they figured out they couldn't control the Wobblies as effectively as they had controlled the Klan. Once they knew they wouldn't have the same control of the pure socialist crowd, it became important to the democrat thugs to limit Socialism the same way they wanted to limit Capitalism. That's why they were madly in love with the system Hitler put in place which was a mix of tightly regulated Capitalism and carefully targeted Socialism.

JMHO

95 posted on 12/19/2011 9:43:32 AM PST by Rashputin (Obama stark, raving, mad, and even his security people know it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

yep...me too...

From Palin to Cain....to the last conservative standing...

Gingrich...with a serious chance to win.


96 posted on 12/19/2011 9:44:21 AM PST by rbmillerjr (Conservative Economic and National Security Commentary: econus.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Milagros

Perry,Bachmann,Santorum

Perry/Bachmann

Perry/Bolton

Perry/Palin


97 posted on 12/19/2011 9:45:02 AM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

depends on which issue, there are things I like and dislike about all the canidates, I do not get to pick who the nominee is I get a chance to pick who i think the nominee should be then I just get to choose between obama or that nominee and that is a simple choice for me, not voting for the person who runs against obama is the same as voting for obama


98 posted on 12/19/2011 9:49:02 AM PST by edzo4 (You call us the 'Party Of No', I call us the resistance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: L,TOWM

Newt


99 posted on 12/19/2011 9:50:03 AM PST by david1313
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Milagros

I’m still undecided but here are my choices:

1. Michele Bachmann, I think she would do ok against Barry in the debates and be a good President.

2. Rick Santorum, ditto.

3. Rick Perry, I fear his debating skills against Barry, but a good President.

4. Newt Gingrich would be very entertaining in a debate against Barry but I’m not sure he’s right for President.


100 posted on 12/19/2011 9:50:34 AM PST by blkmontecarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-136 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson