Skip to comments.Can we vote it out here Freepers? Newt/Mitt/Rick/Michele?
Posted on 12/19/2011 7:10:04 AM PST by Milagros
I vote for Newt!
* Newt Gingrich?
* Mitt Romney?
* Rick Perry?
* Michele Bachmann?
* Rick Santorum?
* Jon Huntsman?
Ron Paul. the only one left that recognizes Government is the problem not the solution.
NONE OF THE ABOVE !
Governor Rick Perry
Paul or none of the above
so then I might as well just give up now because the outcome is inevitable right? good thing we didn’t have the attitude when we landed at normandy that if we didnt take france all at once we might as well not even try...
the left has gotten where they are inch by inch and if we have to push it back inch by inch I am willing to fight, I am not going to be a spoiled brat and not participate if I dont get everything I want all at once
1 Michele Bachmann
2 Rick Santorum
agree. . .i might have been for newt except he supported TARP, single payer, and global warming.
Here is the way I see it...
mcromney... communist lite
mcgrinchrich... socialist lite
mcperry... the bushes 4th term
bachman... mcromneys puppet
ron paul... enough said
huntsman... more of a lib than fubo
with this in mind, daffy duck gets my vote... the tea party gets the house and senate votes from me..
Are we really "pushing back", or just stopping the advance temporarily, until the next Democrat administration or congressional majority comes along? What does the history of the last 30 years tell you? Are we really pushing them back by supporting the Republican Party, or are we just slowing the advance?
Perry is not Bush lite,that is inaccurate.Neither Bush EVER spoke ill of the UN.Gingrich has way too many flip flops.
well it will depend on who the nominee is whether we are pushing back or stalling, but either is better than surrender
Which nominee do you think is going to "push back"? What's their plan to do it?
Dittos on your picks.
The Democrat party has always wanted rule by consensus of the nobility, not a single King they might have to wrestle with. The only reason they want a democrat President is to get from where we are to where they want to be. When they think they've arrived at their destination, having any chump who can read a teleprompter and spew the right lies is fine with them. That's why they let Barry have the Presidency, they thought they had finally arrived and would be able to once and for all establish single party rule with a democrat fascist nobility picking who would have which offices and for how long.
Euthanasia and limiting Capitalism to the portions of the economy that please the nobility has been what they've wanted ever since they figured out they couldn't control the Wobblies as effectively as they had controlled the Klan. Once they knew they wouldn't have the same control of the pure socialist crowd, it became important to the democrat thugs to limit Socialism the same way they wanted to limit Capitalism. That's why they were madly in love with the system Hitler put in place which was a mix of tightly regulated Capitalism and carefully targeted Socialism.
From Palin to Cain....to the last conservative standing...
Gingrich...with a serious chance to win.
depends on which issue, there are things I like and dislike about all the canidates, I do not get to pick who the nominee is I get a chance to pick who i think the nominee should be then I just get to choose between obama or that nominee and that is a simple choice for me, not voting for the person who runs against obama is the same as voting for obama
I’m still undecided but here are my choices:
1. Michele Bachmann, I think she would do ok against Barry in the debates and be a good President.
2. Rick Santorum, ditto.
3. Rick Perry, I fear his debating skills against Barry, but a good President.
4. Newt Gingrich would be very entertaining in a debate against Barry but I’m not sure he’s right for President.