Posted on 01/02/2012 3:32:08 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
In Monday afternoon Fox News interview, ex-Alaska Guv praises Santorum again and adds "Donald Trump has a lot to offer."
Palin: "I did praise Rick Santorum and I'll praise him again...
(Excerpt) Read more at thepage.time.com ...
A person shilling the threads for a man who tried forcing Guardasil on girls over parental wishes, speaks lovingly at LaRaza and Muslim events and accepts gifts from Mexican presidents in appreciation for his open border comments really has no room to talk about ‘real’ conservatives.
A run through your post history, which I recommend anyone taking you at face value do, reveals one of the grander cases of PDS remaining here.
Of course, these issues have been discussed, debated, debunked, dealt with, etc a few thousand times on FR since 2007 and you know it. But hey, keep bringing the same stuff up and throwing it at the wall. People genuinely interested will look it up as many before them, go deeper into these issues than your soundbytes and actually learn the realities surrounding them.
“I’m so glad that you didn’t, you are ever merciful.”
As I pointed out recently, I am supreme in thought, word and deed. I will be happy, in my mercy, to give you the proper opinions you should hold, if you would but only ask. This would save you from making a fool of yourself by associating good people with prostitution and other muddy waters you find yourself swimming in on a semi-regular basis.
“I’m cut to the quick. I’ll need to reconsider my whole worldview now.”
I think many of us here agree that it would be to your benefit.
“Curse you, Norm Lenhart! I’m slain, crumpled in a ditch by your obvious superiority. “
I am also morally superior. Watch this...
You slunk into that ditch with your comment on Palin Gunner. Just admit you screwed up. If not to the rest of us, to yourself. There is something very wrong with a person making your ‘implication’ over a personality conflict. That’s what liberals do.
That said, it’s not easy being me, so much WIN wrapped up in such a gloriously incredible and talented package, but it is the burden I must bear. No need to confirm it for me. I am well aware. Now go away or I shall taunt you a second time, fart in your general direction, bring out the Holy Hand Grenade etc ...
YOU Betcha ;)
There’s not much I can say to that, it’s just too much.
I’m truly shredded into hamburger over here.
You betcha.
My mercy knows no bounds ;)
Just take one or two more steps of equal magnitude in the direction of respectful disagreement and you'll be there.
Cheers!
I don't recall having done so.
Just take one or two more steps of equal magnitude in the direction of respectful disagreement and you'll be there.
Nope. Don't like her or trust her. My prerogative.
“I don’t recall having done so.”
What exactly do you think that ‘implying’ that she is a prostitute actually means Bill Clinton? You can parse your BS all you want. It is what it is and you said what you said. All the semantics and word games you want to play do not change reality.
However did you miss that? Or was the omission during your reply intentional?
Cheers!
Last I checked she wasn't a savior or a Popess.
She's just another person. With a record of bailing on her followers.
All the semantics and word games you want to play do not change reality.
Yep. She bailed on you.
But keep the dream alive by all means.
Instead of ignoring the question, try answering it. Better yet, just take my earlier advice. Let it go. You are just digging a deeper hole.
debunked? I posted links to alaska government documents...disagreeing because it hurts too much to accept the facts is not debunking...it is much closer to magical thinking.
Magical thinking is when you ignore several years and literally tens of thousands of posts rehashing your ‘half the story’ postings to infinity, and hoping no one bothers to read up for ‘the rest of the story’.
FR has a search function. Use it. Or not. Your choice.
And your ideal conservative running is whom? Don’t bother. I read your history. You hate, and have trashed, pretty much everyone.
_________________________________________
Reduced to flat-out lies, normy?
I have been out of the politico loop for a few days but I thought I saw Palin channel surfing last night;did she also praise Romney and Santorum Bachmann,Paul and Trump?
Challenge accepted
___________
“Will Iowa Produce a Viable Alternative to Romney?
Saturday, December 31, 2011 11:53:33 AM · 8 of 10
moose-matson to TBBT “
:”I am not a Romney guy. “
That’s one...
“I liked Daniels but he didn’t want it. “
That’s two
“I liked Perry for a while but he’s proven to be an empty suit. “
Three.....
“I never liked Cain’s 999 plan at all. “
Four....
“MB is a stick of gum. “
Five...
“Paul is certifiable.”
Six...
“Rick Santorum lacks the new-age media-friendly persona to compete head-to-head.”
Seven....
“I like Newt but there’s just too much “there, there” to get him the nomination.”
Eight...
“Palin is unqualified, unelectable and uninterested.”
Nine....
“I am afraid to say that I think that we will get stuck with Romney...which, while not at all my preference, is better than four more years of obama.
All of this is said with full understanding that the world could change tomorrow and all of today’s bets would be off. “
So in a single post, you flat out trashed four candidates; have no intent to support three at all; and wrote off three over various personal/opinion issues with them.
My quote was “You hate, and have trashed, pretty much everyone.” That is pretty much everyone.
The person lying here, is not me.
I think she would say yes to any VP nod including Romney.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.