Remember to wag your finger when you say that.
Posted on 01/02/2012 3:32:08 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
In Monday afternoon Fox News interview, ex-Alaska Guv praises Santorum again and adds "Donald Trump has a lot to offer."
Palin: "I did praise Rick Santorum and I'll praise him again...
(Excerpt) Read more at thepage.time.com ...
Santorum/ Palin 2012?? Nice ticket.
He does not like girls
I watched the entire interview, never heard her say she was open to VP. Do not know how I could have missed that part
But seriously, what is Palin using for brains?
Palin has just proven herself to be a twit.
________________________________________
Wasilla long term debt when palin took office - $1.2 million.
Wasilla long term debt when palin left office - $23 million.
As governor, palin imposed a windfall profits tax on oil companies (over and above existing taxes and royalty schemes). The net was loss of oil company exploration in the state.
As governor, palin committed $500 million (yes, half a billion) to a corporation to support its efforts to get a pipeline going. Nothing has happened yet and the taxpayers' money is, at this point, lost.
Was that the "solidly conservative record" you wrote about?
Yeah such a twit that she was picked for VP over all other potential running mates. Such a twit that she brings out record crowds when she speaks. Such a twit that if she changed her mind the whole presidential race would suffer a tsunami. PDS. For some it's a permanent problem.
Can you provide links to these stories?
I call anyone who encourages Trump to be next to a traitor and someone who does not love their country as much as themselves.
Palin can go jump in a lake as far as I'm concerned. She is dangerous.
There is NOTHING good about Trump running as a third party and he is all ego and Palin is helping to stroke it. Shame on Palin!!
She has been a twit to you at all times. Now get over your PDS and quit posting you don’t like her on EVERY Sarah Palin thread.
Palin DID NOT address anything about VP. Bolling brought it up and she pretty much ignored it. Regarding her comments about Santorum and Trump, you might want to look at the interview before you jump to conclusions. She said that Santorum was ideologically consistent. She said that Trump has some good ideas. She said that Ron Paul was right on fiscal policy. She also said that NONE of the candidates are perfect.
What are you using for brains? Watch the interview. She does not support the idea of anyone running 3rd party. All she said was that Trump has the right to do what he wants and to think what he does.
I really have never been anti-Palin and as a matter of fact, I've always liked her more than her gullible fans and now today, this just proves it.
You betcha he does--for Obama.
Remember to wag your finger when you say that.
""Donald Trump has a lot to offer."--Sarah Palin
BTW, that would make a good tag line, wouldn't it but why bother--she's not worth it.
Only "now"? LOL!
Just how short do you think our memories are? That's a hoot!
Perhaps the best thing you can teach your grandchildren and great-grandchildren is to get the facts before giving their opinion. Palin does NOT support Trump or Paul running 3rd party. She simply stated that each of them have some good ideas. She DID say that a 3rd party run would hand the election to Obama.
Here is one site that links to various government budget and debt reports that show exactly what I wrote to be true vis a vis Wasilla.
http://www.dailysource.org/special/palin/183
As for the windfall tax...if you don't already know about that then you really have not been paying attention.
Same for the pipeline to nowhere and its $500 million commitment of Alaska taxpayers' money.
Here's a link to the official Alaska site that charts the project. You will see that absolutely nothing has moved forward but the good people of Alaska have in fact, through palin, been committed to paying $500 million even though, in the words of the state, there is no guarantee that a pipeline will ever be built...
And this was her crowning achievement as Governor.
http://gasline.alaska.gov/inducements/inducements.html
I really don’t care what you think but I think if Sarah Palin really loves her country, she will be doing everything within her power to DISCOURAGE Trump—not encourage him.
“Donald Trump has a lot to offer.”—Sarah Palin—enough said.
Get off your hobby horse. This is merely justifier #349 for you to hate on Palin. Any other political figure could have made the same remarks, and you wouldn't have made a single comment.
Your reputation as a Palin hater extraordinaire, strips you of all credibility where she's the subject.
So do you think Trump has something to offer? Palin does and you worship Palin so you, too must think Trump has something to offer, even if it's to reelect Obama.
I have no patience for anyone who would think of such an unthinkable act. Trump is to be ridiculed for his actions--not encouraged.
Like I said, you need little provocation to pounce on Palin. It’s what the voices tell you to do.
Yes, she did say she would not support a third party.
Lately Sarah is seeming a bit flaky.
Sarah Palin is no patriot and you would not allow anyone else to get by saying what Palin has said.
Is Sarah Palin encouraging Trump to run third party so he may ask her to run with him? I wouldn't be surprised.
There is NO virtue in encouraging Trump.
I think that she was planning on running but something happened!!??? Don’t know what but she has made an about face.
I'm so glad that you didn't, you are ever merciful.
You just aren’t half as witty, nor intelligent, as you think you are.
I'm cut to the quick. I'll need to reconsider my whole worldview now.
Curse you, Norm Lenhart! I'm slain, crumpled in a ditch by your obvious superiority.
You betcha.
A person shilling the threads for a man who tried forcing Guardasil on girls over parental wishes, speaks lovingly at LaRaza and Muslim events and accepts gifts from Mexican presidents in appreciation for his open border comments really has no room to talk about ‘real’ conservatives.
A run through your post history, which I recommend anyone taking you at face value do, reveals one of the grander cases of PDS remaining here.
Of course, these issues have been discussed, debated, debunked, dealt with, etc a few thousand times on FR since 2007 and you know it. But hey, keep bringing the same stuff up and throwing it at the wall. People genuinely interested will look it up as many before them, go deeper into these issues than your soundbytes and actually learn the realities surrounding them.
“I’m so glad that you didn’t, you are ever merciful.”
As I pointed out recently, I am supreme in thought, word and deed. I will be happy, in my mercy, to give you the proper opinions you should hold, if you would but only ask. This would save you from making a fool of yourself by associating good people with prostitution and other muddy waters you find yourself swimming in on a semi-regular basis.
“I’m cut to the quick. I’ll need to reconsider my whole worldview now.”
I think many of us here agree that it would be to your benefit.
“Curse you, Norm Lenhart! I’m slain, crumpled in a ditch by your obvious superiority. “
I am also morally superior. Watch this...
You slunk into that ditch with your comment on Palin Gunner. Just admit you screwed up. If not to the rest of us, to yourself. There is something very wrong with a person making your ‘implication’ over a personality conflict. That’s what liberals do.
That said, it’s not easy being me, so much WIN wrapped up in such a gloriously incredible and talented package, but it is the burden I must bear. No need to confirm it for me. I am well aware. Now go away or I shall taunt you a second time, fart in your general direction, bring out the Holy Hand Grenade etc ...
YOU Betcha ;)
There’s not much I can say to that, it’s just too much.
I’m truly shredded into hamburger over here.
You betcha.
My mercy knows no bounds ;)
Just take one or two more steps of equal magnitude in the direction of respectful disagreement and you'll be there.
Cheers!
I don't recall having done so.
Just take one or two more steps of equal magnitude in the direction of respectful disagreement and you'll be there.
Nope. Don't like her or trust her. My prerogative.
“I don’t recall having done so.”
What exactly do you think that ‘implying’ that she is a prostitute actually means Bill Clinton? You can parse your BS all you want. It is what it is and you said what you said. All the semantics and word games you want to play do not change reality.
However did you miss that? Or was the omission during your reply intentional?
Cheers!
Last I checked she wasn't a savior or a Popess.
She's just another person. With a record of bailing on her followers.
All the semantics and word games you want to play do not change reality.
Yep. She bailed on you.
But keep the dream alive by all means.
Instead of ignoring the question, try answering it. Better yet, just take my earlier advice. Let it go. You are just digging a deeper hole.
debunked? I posted links to alaska government documents...disagreeing because it hurts too much to accept the facts is not debunking...it is much closer to magical thinking.
Magical thinking is when you ignore several years and literally tens of thousands of posts rehashing your ‘half the story’ postings to infinity, and hoping no one bothers to read up for ‘the rest of the story’.
FR has a search function. Use it. Or not. Your choice.
And your ideal conservative running is whom? Don’t bother. I read your history. You hate, and have trashed, pretty much everyone.
_________________________________________
Reduced to flat-out lies, normy?
I have been out of the politico loop for a few days but I thought I saw Palin channel surfing last night;did she also praise Romney and Santorum Bachmann,Paul and Trump?
Challenge accepted
___________
“Will Iowa Produce a Viable Alternative to Romney?
Saturday, December 31, 2011 11:53:33 AM · 8 of 10
moose-matson to TBBT “
:”I am not a Romney guy. “
That’s one...
“I liked Daniels but he didn’t want it. “
That’s two
“I liked Perry for a while but he’s proven to be an empty suit. “
Three.....
“I never liked Cain’s 999 plan at all. “
Four....
“MB is a stick of gum. “
Five...
“Paul is certifiable.”
Six...
“Rick Santorum lacks the new-age media-friendly persona to compete head-to-head.”
Seven....
“I like Newt but there’s just too much “there, there” to get him the nomination.”
Eight...
“Palin is unqualified, unelectable and uninterested.”
Nine....
“I am afraid to say that I think that we will get stuck with Romney...which, while not at all my preference, is better than four more years of obama.
All of this is said with full understanding that the world could change tomorrow and all of today’s bets would be off. “
So in a single post, you flat out trashed four candidates; have no intent to support three at all; and wrote off three over various personal/opinion issues with them.
My quote was “You hate, and have trashed, pretty much everyone.” That is pretty much everyone.
The person lying here, is not me.
I think she would say yes to any VP nod including Romney.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.