Skip to comments.The Dems May Have Miscalculated on Ms. Fluke
Posted on 03/10/2012 8:29:16 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
click here to read article
Can you toss in hair plugs for me while we are at it?
fluke also coauthored an article saying that sex change operations should be payed for by tax payers as well.
Now I think we all agree that sex change operations should indeed be paid for by tax payers. However the problem I see arising is what if after a few months that person decides he or she doesnt like their new sex and wants to change back.
Therefore I think we need to stipulate that tax payers will only pay for one sex change per year.
Reply from kickass
>Therefore I think we need to stipulate that tax payers will only pay for one sex change per year<
They should do it based on odd and even years, just like the Carter years of Gas Rationing.
Even years, innies to outties. Odd years, outties to innies.
You know I’m here trying to be helpful and all I get are a bunch of smart-ass remarks.
“She never claimed she was spending that much.”
She said “we students have faced financial, emotional, and medical burdens as a result”. We means ‘we’, not ‘they’.
She said, “Without insurance coverage, contraception can cost a woman over $3,000 during law school. For a lot of students who, like me, are on public interest scholarships, thats practically an entire summers salary.”
That certainly implies that she has experienced that cost.
She said, “We can only answer that we expected women to be treated equally, to not have our school create untenable burdens that impede our academic success. We expected that our schools would live up to the Jesuit creed of cura personalis, to care for the whole person, by meeting all of our medical needs. We expected that when we told our universities of the problems this policy created for students, they would help us.”
Again, we means we. It means she feels her school “create[s] untenable burdens that impede our academic success.”
Any fair reading of her testimony would be either that she is exaggerating her involvement as much as she is exaggerating the costs, or that she was saying that she had also shared in these burdens imposed by her school...
3000 over 3 years.
If I remember correctly, Rush never actually called her a slut, he said someone could call her one.
Conservatives should be accurate.
So should liberals, but we all know they won't, and I for one, am tired of getting the short end of the political stick because conservatives don't seem to understand they're fighting an enemy that has no moral standard.
Which, IMHO, was pretty much the point Rush was trying to make with his unapologetic 'apology'.
You SO owe me a keyboard!
WTFl - what the Flucke (pronounced Fluck)
Obama really Fluked up this time
Elvis - Yay, yay, I’m all fluked up
It’s a little different. When a prostitute takes money from a complete stranger for sex, the man also participates in the sex. Sandra Fluke is demanding money from complete strangers for sex, but the people paying are not participating in the sex. In other words, hookers are more honest than liberal activists.
The Fluke Charade
Why should we have to fund a middle-aged schoolgirls sex life? By Mark Steyn
I wish this was as true with Republican Party leaders as it is with the base.
I know Obamas media surrogates called members of the tea party teabaggers, but I wasn’t aware he used the term itself. Are you certain?
Just trying to keep everybody currently living in Obamaville smiling. There is hope outside the wire.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.