Shame on any fellow Catholics who voted for Barack Hussein Obama. Is there anything more evil than murdering a baby who survived an abortion?
Posted on 03/10/2012 8:29:16 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Yea, verily.
I would recommend that everyone slip a condom into an envelope and mail it to the Dean of the Georgetown University Law School. Insert with the condom a note that requests its being forwarded to Ms Fluke and the “Finance Fluke’s *ucking Fund (4-F).”
I am sure they would be glad to assist in the cause.
$3,000 for three years.
But it would be possible to spend only about $26 per year, even if she were on her back six days a week =
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TudWeY4iJOI
This controversy with Fluke may be a game changer.
fluke also coauthored an article saying that sex change operations should be payed for by tax payers as well.
http://mrctv.org/blog/sandra-fluke-gender-reassignment-and-health-insurance-transcript
Now I think we all agree that sex change operations should indeed be paid for by tax payers. However the problem I see arising is what if after a few months that person decides he or she doesn’t like their new sex and wants to change back.
Therefore I think we need to stipulate that tax payers will only pay for one sex change per year.
They should do it based on odd and even years, just like the Carter years of Gas Rationing.
Even years, innies to outties. Odd years, outties to innies.
That would make her a lunatic, not a whore...
Why are we still calling them Democrats, they are Communists, Marxist and Socialist.
Let's assume it is true for a minute. Here are the implications of her statement:
(1) She doesn't know how to avail herself of all the 'free' services already out there that provide birth control at no or low cost;
(2) Fluke was really nothing more than a female activist hell bent on changing a Catholic Institution's policy, which she KNEW was in place BEFORE she chose to attend Georgetown;
(3) Fluke certainly "gets around";
(4) If I were some guy that "slept" with her while she was paying $3,000 for birth control, I'd be worried about my man-parts falling off about now. Really, how many guys did she sleep with anyway paying for all that birth control?!
Personally, I do not need free birth control, however I do require free contact lenses. Let me briefly make my case.
Ms Fluke may venture into a bar and having imbibed a bit too much, she could then engage in unsafe sex and thus find herself punished with a baby. This would clearly be the government's fault and the only way to avoid this outcome would be to provide Ms Fluke with the free birth control of her choosing.
How does this translate to my need for contact lenses? Let me explain.
My husband of 16 years has had a vas and I do not need free birth control. However, I could venture into the same before mentioned bar. I could also imbibe a bit too much. I could even lose my Dolce and Gabbana prescription glasses and accidentally mistake a complete stranger for my own dear husband, have unprotected sex with him, and thus find myself also punished with a baby.
Clearly, the government should therefore also provide me with free corrective contact lenses. I prefer the daily disposables.
I could also use a free gym membership and a private trainer.
Can you toss in hair plugs for me while we are at it?
fluke also coauthored an article saying that sex change operations should be payed for by tax payers as well.
http://mrctv.org/blog/sandra-fluke-gender-reassignment-and-health-insurance-transcript
Now I think we all agree that sex change operations should indeed be paid for by tax payers. However the problem I see arising is what if after a few months that person decides he or she doesn’t like their new sex and wants to change back.
Therefore I think we need to stipulate that tax payers will only pay for one sex change per year.
Reply from kickass
>”Therefore I think we need to stipulate that tax payers will only pay for one sex change per year”<
They should do it based on odd and even years, just like the Carter years of Gas Rationing.
Even years, innies to outties. Odd years, outties to innies.
Dear Kickass,
You know I’m here trying to be helpful and all I get are a bunch of smart-ass remarks.
“She never claimed she was spending that much.”
She said “we students have faced financial, emotional, and medical burdens as a result”. We means ‘we’, not ‘they’.
She said, “Without insurance coverage, contraception can cost a woman over $3,000 during law school. For a lot of students who, like me, are on public interest scholarships, that’s practically an entire summer’s salary.”
That certainly implies that she has experienced that cost.
She said, “We can only answer that we expected women to be treated equally, to not have our school create untenable burdens that impede our academic success. We expected that our schools would live up to the Jesuit creed of cura personalis, to care for the whole person, by meeting all of our medical needs. We expected that when we told our universities of the problems this policy created for students, they would help us.”
Again, we means we. It means she feels her school “create[s] untenable burdens that impede our academic success.”
Any fair reading of her testimony would be either that she is exaggerating her involvement as much as she is exaggerating the costs, or that she was saying that she had also shared in these burdens imposed by her school...
3000 over 3 years.
If I remember correctly, Rush never actually called her a slut, he said someone could call her one.
-----
Conservatives should be accurate.
So should liberals, but we all know they won't, and I for one, am tired of getting the short end of the political stick because conservatives don't seem to understand they're fighting an enemy that has no moral standard.
Which, IMHO, was pretty much the point Rush was trying to make with his unapologetic 'apology'.
:-)
ROFLMAO!
You SO owe me a keyboard!
Shame on any fellow Catholics who voted for Barack Hussein Obama. Is there anything more evil than murdering a baby who survived an abortion?
WTFl - what the Flucke (pronounced Fluck)
Obama really Fluked up this time
Elvis - Yay, yay, I’m all fluked up
It’s a little different. When a prostitute takes money from a complete stranger for sex, the man also participates in the sex. Sandra Fluke is demanding money from complete strangers for sex, but the people paying are not participating in the sex. In other words, hookers are more honest than liberal activists.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.