To: 2ndDivisionVet
Only if he does a 180 from his Massachusetts governance. I worked for President Reagan, Friend,Then you know that Reagan's tenure as President was far more conservative than his governance of California.
12 posted on
06/02/2012 10:20:14 AM PDT by
Drew68
(I WILL vote to defeat Barack Hussein Obama!)
To: Drew68
Since I lived in California most of the period from four months after my birth in 1960 to 1974, I am familiar with what was happening then, yes.
16 posted on
06/02/2012 10:28:09 AM PDT by
2ndDivisionVet
(Ich habe keinen Konig aber Gott)
To: Drew68
Then you know that Reagan's tenure as President was far more conservative than his governance of California.
Hey, come on. Don't use those sophomoric debate tactics like using facts! We've got so much more important things going on here, like "conservatives" using their vote for a Pyhrric victory by voting for other than Obama's Republican challenger. Well, it would not even be a Pyhrric victory, considering that NO one other than the Republican candidate has a chance against a Democrat candidate. Call it Pyhrric Plus--all the devastating cost of the Pyhrric victory plus defeat. The only consolation would be able to say in retrospect, "It was a far better thing to have voted my conscience and let the nation truly go to hell than to vote against my conscience and have a least a shot of preventing the reelection of Barack Obama, because, you know, in the end, which is of longer lasting importance--trying to stop four years of evil becoming eight or more years of the same or engaging in a singular act of moral masturbation with its post-electoral glow of self-satisfaction no matter what? And, hey, we all know that if Mitt and a Republican House and Senate were elected, we as conservatives would have a LOT harder time getting them to go in a conservative direction than Obama."
25 posted on
06/02/2012 10:38:14 AM PDT by
aruanan
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson