“You know, folks might possibly listen to you if you actually laid out Dewhurst’s conservative record for once. So far, all I’ve seen you do, is call him a “great conservative”.
Anything else I list for you will be rejected by you because you have made up your mind that you are going to be against David Dewhurst because the people you like have told you to be for his opponent.
I have proved that David Dewhurst is the real conservative in this contest in several long posts on this and other threads. You can use the Free Republic search tool if you would like to learn more.
Incidentally, these other threads are usually posted by the out-of-state Cruz-Cronies trying to nationalize the Texas Primary.
I think you could be a credit to the party if you were to start familiarizing yourself with Texas politics, then you would know who actually governs conservatively over the long haul and will represent our own state versus someone who has the gift of gab and can talk like a conservative and use the tea-party for their own ends. After all, maybe the out-of-state people who are trying to claim the tea-party identity think they get something from having Cruz on their team.
That is such a load of bull. It's a simple matter to make a Word document of your favored candidate's accomplishments, then paste it into a post whenever you're attempting to inform others of their record.
Cutting and pasting sales hype from your candidate's campaign site just causes others to laugh.
Telling people to research your posting history about your candidate is a total cop-out, and shows that you've got nothing to back up your statements. If your candidate has such a sterling record, you could quote lots of it from memory, but you don't.
Looks to me like you've got nothing.