Skip to comments.The Problem with Voting “Other” Whether Libertarian or 3rd Party
Posted on 10/19/2012 11:53:15 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
I have a lot of respect for my Libertarian friends, and they are frequently the first people Id like to have a discussion with about a new policy or political controversy. I find most of them to be intelligent, thoughtful, well-read people. I also find that in large part Independents (including the Tea Party) often have much in common with the right when it comes to the issues of this particular electioneconomics and the over-reach of the Federal government.
But I do think that to actually vote for a 3rd party candidate in a tight general election (as this one) is to actually harm the chances of someone whose views are probably most similar to your own. A vote for a 3rd party actually makes a TWO point difference in terms of real numbers, from +1 to a -1 vote that could have been received by one of the main candidates. Lets get practicalin a close election, a few thousand votes can make or break the entire Electoral College contribution of a state, which in turn can determine the winner of the election.
A recent Des Moines Register poll showed only a 1-point difference between Romney and Obama here in Iowa. And in both 2004 and 2008, other votes in Iowa made up . 1 percent.
So by all means, make your case to anyone who will listen in the off-years and primary season! In fact, the last 2 election cycles, Ive supported someone other than the eventual candidate at caucus time. But once the primaries are over, I think we do need to figure out which of the remaining candidates is closest in ideology to our own views.
As to Gary Johnson himself, I find myself agreeing with manyif not mostof his positions. I want education back at the local level. I absolutely believe that the 2nd Amendment has implications for the rest of the Bill of Rights. And he was right on when he reportedly said, My next door neighbors two dogs have created more shovel-ready jobs than this current administration.
My main personal concerns about any Libertarian candidate are the tendencies for fast change and the hesitancy to deploy the military. I frequently wonder if the drastic fix-it-now approaches of the Libertarian movement are the best approach. There are so many entrenched government programs and expenditures in place today that practically speaking, its going to take some time for states and individuals to adjust. My second concern is that a Libertarian president may put ideology ahead of national defense. In my opinion, there ARE times when we need to engage in combat, and I want a President who wont hesitate to do that if it becomes necessary.
Even so, I can certainly respect the 3rd party voteor even abstentionof someone who has deeply considered the issues and clearly done their homework.
But this election is not an apples-to-apples choice, but truly an apples-to-oranges choice between two very different ideologies. So I think those who chose to actually vote for Gary Johnson this particular election will actually be harming the chances of another candidate who isnt as far off from their views as they might think.
Voting 3rd party is political masturbation. It makes you feel good, but doesn’t accomplish anything.
Unfortunately, I suspect that "reality" is not going to provide time to adjust. The U.S. is like a binge drinker whose bouts have become longer, more frequent, and more intense. We've borrowed all the Chinese will supply. We have probably "borrowed" much of what the Fed can supply.
At the same time that the borrowing has been accelerating, we have been fast approaching the end of all our credit lines. There is no way for our weakened economy to be taxed sufficiently to provide the resources required.
We will all be "adjusting" rapidly whether we want to or not.
DMACC Professor Anita Morrill said that, not 2ndDivisionVet.
I agree that voting Libertarian isn’t pragmatically viablethe RD duopoly being what it is forces participation in the suboptimal R choice, since voting L merely increases the odds of greater undesirable outcomes (more Ds getting elected). The better approach for Libertarianism to gain traction would be to keep infiltrating the GOP; though the downside is that this would invite backlash from SoCons in the GOP who enjoy using government to play social engineer just like Liberals do, albeit with a different agenda of course.
I disagree with the author’s assumption that Libertarianism is incompatible with a strong national defense. I see Libertarianism as being more directly opposed to nation-bulding, as well as avoiding international entanglement in agreements that don’t serve national self-interest.
lol. My view is totally the opposite.
1. I think libertarians are insane.
2. I think they have every right to support and vote for a third party that better represent their views.
let me add
3. They are adults. Age-wise. I assume they can make decisions on their own what is in their best interest.
What the author of this article has failed to mention is that, since the presidential election is not a direct election, but rather a (with only one exception: Nebraska) winner-take-all, state-by-state election, voters in uncontested Democratic strongholds such as my home state (California) will not hurt Romney's (already dismal) chances by awarding their vote to the Libertarian Party.
Of course, voters with 3rd-party preferences in so-called "battleground" states would do well to reconsider "wasting" their votes. Conservative voters in such states would indeed be favoring Obummer by strictly "voting their conscience."
False! There are small, but non-negligible benefits to voting 3rd party (assuming that such a 3rd party indeed more-closely reflects your political convictions):
1) Matching campaign funds and
There are also huge — albeit fairly improbable — disastrous consequences to voting 3rd party. For example, if Romney loses VA by fewer votes than Virgil garners, and the Marxist wins another four years as a result, that would also be “non-negligible,” to say the least!
Have, in the meantime, determined that Maine likewise can split its electoral college votes.
No one, whether it’s me or anyone else, can tell you how to cast your vote. That franchise was won on the battlefields of the Revolutionary War and defended in every war since, from 1812 to Iraq. Each citizen who is not a felon or in an insane asylum get the same one vote. Use it or don’t use it as you see fit.
Those who harp on those voting third party seem to make the same assumption: if they do not vote third party, they will vote for Romney. There are other possibilities, most likely not voting on that line at all. Not everyone believes Romney has changed his views as radically as he claims. It is hard for some to pull the lever for someone whose history is opposed to their views.
Had the Libertarians in AZ8 voted for Jesse Kelly then Gabby Giffords would still have all of her brain because she wouldn’t have been at that shopping center.
In an election this important you would think that those “educated” libertarians would use their noggin to remove the dictator in office. I guess there’s a reason that the phrase, “educated fools”, was invented...: )
Surely, my fellow Americans understand that they have only ONE chance to remove a communist cabal from power peacefully. That chance is November 6, 2012 Who can afford to focus on anything else?
No true Patriot will be sitting out the election at home this time. No decent American will sit on the sidelines in some futile 3rd party fantasy or protest. There is simply too much at stake.
We currently have a known enemy of our nation residing in the peoples White House. The people didnt have the good sense to stop it in 2008. The courts didnt have the courage to stop it or rectify the disaster after the 2008 election. Congress hasnt had the backbone to correct the fraud and hold all accountable, even after the 2010 cycle that swept so-called Tea Party candidates into political power. Not even state governments have the honor and courage to block a known fraud from appearing on the ballot again in 2012.
That means that righting the greatest wrong ever perpetrated in American politics is left to the American people alone. They will get ONE CHANCE to end this charade, peacefully, on November 6th. If they fail to end it peacefully, they will be left with only a Second Amendment solution. There is no other solution at that point.
When did communism become an American Dream for some? A long time ago When the American people allowed it.
When did the communist dream become acceptable to the rest of America? Only YOU can answer this one, on November 6th, 2012.
No American can afford to sit this one out or play childish games with fantasy candidates. Removing this criminal communist cabal from power is the ONLY relevant issue of the 2012 election. Only a traitor, a coward or a fool would tell you any different!
I voted third party in 2008 because I consider John McCain a menace and the Judas Iscariot of the Republican Party. Mitt Romney may policy-to-policy be less conservative than McCain but I’d vote for Romney now simply because we no longer have a blank slate running against him. We have four years of economic illiteracy combined with incredible gall and arrogance.
A third party vote is simply doubling down on four more years of bad economic policy and four more years of lies about everything under the sun. No thinking American should allow that to happen.
I’d encourage “3rd-party” against:
GOP Roraback CT-5 (pro-gay-marriage, NARAL, physician assisted suicide, in a center-right district)
GOP Obsitnick CT-4 (NARAL)
GOP Bass NH-2 (NARAL, in a center-right district)
GOP Tisei MA-5 (gay radical activist, pro-death)
I oppose 3rd-party against:
Scott Brown (supports DOMA, voted ‘no’ on Kagan)
Linda McMahon, CT
Dold, Illinois (mixed voting record per National Right to Life)
Nan Hayworth, NY (mixed voting record per National Right to Life)
the prob is that anyone who lacks sound judgment on this matter is apt to do the 3rd-party thing against anyone who annoys them in the least. 3rd-party is a good thing, but in the hands of stooges, very dangerous tool.
If you are in a state where Romney has a chance of winning then every vote counts, and tactical concerns should trump long term ideals. Put another way - vote for the lesser of two evils! Vote Republican.
“The better approach for Libertarianism to gain traction would be to keep infiltrating the GOP...”
Libertarian is a philosophy, not a political party. Every year they run a Presidential candidate for one reason, publicity. ANY true political party will establish itself at the local level first. Can you site any example, in all the years of Libertarianism’s existence, of a city run by Libertarians which led to a state run by Libertarians?
Of course not. Governing is antithetical to Libertarianism. They have a Marxist (Groucho, that is) legislative agenda. “No matter what it is or who commenced it, I’m against it.”
Over the years I have voted libertarian or constitutional but only when the race was already decided. Am not a big fan of Romney but it is imperative that Obama be shown the door Nov6/Jan20. There is no other choice. If you don’t like Obama now just wait until he doesn’t have to worry about reelection.
I’m completely in favor of “hesitancy to deploy the military” if the rules of engagement envision anything other than unconditional victory.
This was a predictable outcome of allowing Obama to win.
There is no doubt in my mind that McCain would have nominated by accident Supreme Court Justices who would have been superior to Sotomayer and Kagan. We will be paying a price for that for the next thirty years.
If Romney wins, liberals may well look back on this time as a lost opportunity of incredible import. I fully expected Ginsburg to retire. If Romney gets to choose her replacement, our nation may well survive.
I believe that the major reason to vote GOP rather than third party is the effect that we will see regarding the Electoral College if Romney wins the election but doesn't get a simple majority of the votes. The movement to eliminate the Electoral College will get a great boost.
Today, the Electoral College is the only thing that prevents the liberals from winning the Presidency by stealing all the votes they need in California, Illinois, New York, and New Jersey. Voting third-party will provide justification to eliminate this important safeguard.
In that case is voting Republican for Bob Dole a "wasted vote"? Would you have voted for Clinton because not voting for a winning candidate is a "wasted vote"?
Moving back to the real 2012 world, that is exactly why I, as a libertarian, am voting against both Obama and Romney by voting for Gary Johnson. I don't let other people (polls) tell me how to vote. I don't follow the herd. I vote for the candidate I agree with, and if I lose, I lose.
As far as the tactical voting thing goes, the lesser of two evils, Republicans have been doing that since their last conservative presidential candidate, Reagan 30 years ago, and things have just gotten worse. Voting for the lesser of two evils gave us candidate McCain and President Obama.
Also, if McCain had won, there would have been no Tea Party.
Republicans would still be as left-wing socialist as they were during the 2008 election, when none of them saw anything wrong with RomneyCare, McCain’s Cap & Trade, etc.
lesser of two evils: a phrase originated by US Army in WWII. Not a Christian concept.
So I, along with other readers, reject the concept.
Take away Ron Paul's views on national defense and national security and I'd like him.
We still are always confronted with choices. There are only two political parties that can win. I'm a Wm F Buckley Republican--always vote for the most conservative--THAT CAN WIN.
The goal is to advance conservatism and that cannot be done voting "third party".
So you are voting for total abortion, total homosexuality, and totally open borders and for eliminating the border patrol and INS.
There are other options you know, you don’t have to become a radical leftist to not vote Obama/Romney.
” I disagree with the authors assumption that Libertarianism is incompatible with a strong national defense. I see Libertarianism as being more directly opposed to nation-bulding, as well as avoiding international entanglement in agreements that dont serve national self-interest.”
I used to think of myself as more of a libertarian than a Republican until 9/11/2001. Harry Brown’s response to going to Afghanistan changed that. I could understand disagreeing with some of the policies after we got there but his do nothing stance changed that.
The stance of one Libertarian politician doesn’t define Libertarian ideology as a whole.
I would vote for any of them for the simple reason that their opponents will vote for Nancy Pelosi for speaker. Then work for a primary opponent next time around.
there will never be primary opponents against Obsitnick, Roraback, Bass and Tisei. Roraback could hold that seat for 25 years.
Then you certainly won’t ever elect a more conservative 3rd party candidate either. So do you want 4 more votes for Pelosi or not?
it is better if Esty the DEM beats Roraback the radical GOPer
it is a GOP seat
we don’t need NARAL people electing the GOP Congressional leaders.
DEM Esty over Roraback. Elect a conservative Republican in 2014. At least a center-right Republican.
If you are sane then you cannot claim his/this party platform as conservative, freerepublic is not the place for pro-abortion and homosexual agenda promoters, and open borders people and candidates.
Here is the leftists agenda hidden behind the Libertarian Party curtain.
Libertarian Party Platform:
Throw open the borders completely; only a rare individual (terrorist, disease carrier etc.) can be kept from freedom of movement through political boundaries.
Homosexuals; total freedom in the military, gay marriage, adoption, child custody and everything else.
Abortion; zero restrictions or impediments.
Pornography; no restraint, no restrictions.
Drugs; Meth, Heroin, Crack, and anything new that science can come up with, zero restrictions.
Advertising those drugs, prostitution, and pornography; zero restrictions.
Military Strength; minimal capabilities.
You don’t ask people for their opinions, you read the party platform.
“We favor the repeal of ALL laws creating crimes without victims, such as the use of drugs for medicinal or recreational purposes.”
Want to see the details on immigration?
LOL, that’s what I have been saying.
These are the two related elements of your party platform (in plain language), want to see the portion on open borders?
Drugs; Meth, Heroin, Crack, and anything new that science can come up with, zero restrictions.
Advertising those drugs, prostitution, and pornography; zero restrictions.
If the election goes the wrong way or Romney turns into a moderate-liberal, I’ll be ready to put time and money into a third party.
The goal is to make the third party the second party and let the repubs ride off into the sunset as the moderate republican party.
I believe many conservatives would get behind that. It would be 3 years of hard work.