Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrey says hes open to certain gun control measures (Georgia RINO)
The Marietta Daily Journal ^ | January 11, 2013 | Jon Gillooly

Posted on 01/10/2013 10:30:40 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

SMYRNA — U.S. Rep. Phil Gingrey (R-Marietta) tackled such sensitive topics as gun reform, abortion and rape during the Smyrna Area Council of the Cobb Chamber of Commerce breakfast which took place Thursday at the Smyrna Community Center.

Gingrey said he was open to considering certain gun control measures in the wake of the Connecticut elementary school massacre.

“There are some problems, and maybe these huge magazines even for someone who says, ‘look, I just use an AR-15 for target practice,’ but do you really need to be standing there shooting at a silhouette a shot a second or even quicker with that kind of weapon? For what purpose?” Gingrey asked. “I would be willing to listen to the possibility of the capacity of a magazine.”

Gingrey, who took the time to praise Adventure Outdoors owner Jay Wallace as the gold standard for running a responsible gun retail business, said he is also open to revisions of the so-called gun show loophole.

“What it is basically, if you go to a gun show and there’s somebody out there in the parking lot, and they’re getting out of their car, and they’ve got an A-15 on their shoulder or …. John Q. Public wants to sell a handgun or whatever, then there’s no background check,” Gingrey said. “You know, you’re buying a used weapon from somebody and then basically no background check.”

With the sophistication of smartphone technology, there should be an application that allows someone selling a gun to run a background check with relative ease, he said...

(Excerpt) Read more at mdjonline.com ...


TOPICS: Georgia; Issues; Parties; U.S. Congress
KEYWORDS: banglist; congress; georgia; gingrey; guncontrol; lineinthesand; nocompromise; rino; secondamendment; youwillnotdisarmus
Is he running for House Speaker?
1 posted on 01/10/2013 10:30:57 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Hey I know! Lets vote more GOP into office. That’s a real good plan. Because if we don’t the dems will...

Oh wait...


2 posted on 01/10/2013 10:33:50 PM PST by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Norm Lenhart

Freedom is such a difficult concept for those without a sense of right and wrong.

Without a rock anchorage, mankind is adrift and no Godless philosophy can weasel it’s way around that fact.


3 posted on 01/10/2013 10:37:49 PM PST by One Name (Ultimately, the TRUTH is a razor's edge and no man can sit astride it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Of course he’s open.

They’re going to disarm us.

The Constitution only protects them - it doesn’t protect us.

Now go pay your taxes - your hard working government needs the money. :)


4 posted on 01/10/2013 10:37:54 PM PST by Tzimisce (The American Revolution began when the British attempted to disarm the Colonists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Traitor bastard.


5 posted on 01/10/2013 10:43:29 PM PST by SIDENET (I've drawn my line in the sand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I am SHOCKED! He was great when he was my rep. I guess they all go down the sewer at some point.


6 posted on 01/10/2013 10:45:38 PM PST by Politicalmom (Liberalism. Ideas so great they have to be mandatory.-FReeper Osage Orange)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tzimisce

No. They aren’t. They’ll try though.


7 posted on 01/10/2013 10:49:39 PM PST by piytar (The predator-class is furious that their prey are shooting back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
We are in BIG trouble, because Gingrey has NOT been a "RINO". He consistently has rated between 92-100% on the ACU scale. Here is Nat'l Journal's 2012 listing of "Most Conservative" House members...

Most Conservative
1st (tie)
Diane Black, R-Tenn.: 94.0 (Composite Conservative score)
Stephen Fincher, R-Tenn.: 94.0 (Composite Conservative score)
Phil Gingrey, R-Ga.: 94.0 (Composite Conservative score)
Doug Lamborn, R-Colo.: 94.0 (Composite Conservative score)
Bob Latta, R-Ohio: 94.0 (Composite Conservative score)
Jeff Miller, R-Fla.: 94.0 (Composite Conservative score)
Tom Price, R-Ga.: 94.0 (Composite Conservative score)
Ben Quayle, R-Ariz.: 94.0 (Composite Conservative score)
Dennis Ross, R-Fla.: 94.0 (Composite Conservative score)
Lynn Westmoreland, R-Ga.: 94.0 (Composite Conservative score)

8 posted on 01/10/2013 10:51:41 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Well, Jay Leno doesn’t “need” over a hundred cars and twenty motorcycles but that damned ‘free economy’ and nothing in the Bill of Rights to boot. And I’ll bet some of the motorcycles don’t have airbags ...
Idiots like this GA lawmaker are going to get a lot of us killed. And the “Why does ya need that ta hunt?” maroons.
Let’s make a deal: Keep your mitts off the 2nd amendment and we won’t give you a ‘bump-shooting’ exhibition.


9 posted on 01/10/2013 10:53:25 PM PST by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: All armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Mr Gingrey....the high capacity magazines are not for target shooting. They are not for duck hunting either.

When Americans lose their powerful firearms, world order and tyranny is next. There are very very very few countries left in the world where civilians can purchase firearms freely. I think Switzerland is one of those few.


10 posted on 01/10/2013 10:56:41 PM PST by entropy12 (The republic is doomed when people figure out they can get free stuff by voting democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; a fool in paradise

Shuddup Newt Gingrey!


11 posted on 01/10/2013 10:58:55 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong! Ice cream is delicious!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“I would be willing to listen to the possibility of the capacity of a magazine.”

To what purpose sir?
One shot will kill you. Does it matter that a magizine has more? Why?
Years back when I was in Law Enforcement one of my weapons was a Dan Wesson .357
With 2 speed loaders I could put 18 rounds on target at 25 yards before you could duck and cover.
When 20 children are murdered does it matter that it took 2 minutes instead of 3 minutes?
If no magazine had existed that held more then 10 rounds would those children still be alive? No.
Lets stop pretending that this is about guns and admit this is about people. That sir is why no solution will happen. As a nation we lack the will to do anything about people


12 posted on 01/10/2013 10:59:44 PM PST by SECURE AMERICA (Where can I sign up for the American Revolution 2013 and the Crusades 2013?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piytar

I fear what is coming. :(


13 posted on 01/10/2013 11:07:48 PM PST by Tzimisce (The American Revolution began when the British attempted to disarm the Colonists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Maybe he should go to a 3-gun shoot sometime and see how it works. I recommend that he stand downrange so he can get the full affect.


14 posted on 01/10/2013 11:12:19 PM PST by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

They should put warning labels on guns.

“Do not use in gun free zones”

problem solved.

Enough of this gun talk.


15 posted on 01/10/2013 11:21:20 PM PST by 1_Rain_Drop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I need my AR to protect my freedom from you, Mr. Gingrey.

That’s all I’m going to say on this matter. This isn’t open for discussion.

What you think does not matter to me, I do not need you.


16 posted on 01/10/2013 11:39:50 PM PST by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

HIGH CAPACITY MAGAZINE BAN for WHAT?



17 posted on 01/11/2013 4:12:10 AM PST by EdReform (Oath Keepers - Guardians of the Republic - Honor your oath - Join us: www.oathkeepers.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If he wants to run on gun control as a Georgia Republican, he’s more than welcome. He can state his case to the people and if that’s they want, then more power to him.

Of course they don’t want that, so he’ll not only be on the losing side of the votes on this issue, but he’ll also be on the losing side of his next primary.


18 posted on 01/11/2013 4:20:10 AM PST by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813

“We are in BIG trouble...”

No reason to panic yet. He can say whatever he wants, let’s just see how far he takes it. Also don’t forget that there are DOZENS have House Democrats that are scared to death as I type about having to vote on anything dealing with gun control.


19 posted on 01/11/2013 4:23:06 AM PST by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

From the article: “There are some problems, and maybe these huge magazines even for someone who says, ‘look, I just use an AR-15 for target practice,’ but do you really need to be standing there shooting at a silhouette a shot a second or even quicker with that kind of weapon? For what purpose?” Gingrey asked. “I would be willing to listen to the possibility of the capacity of a magazine.”

Another leftist RINO, jockeying for position ahead of his next campaign cycle. Inaccurate political relativism on display for all to see.

The Second Amendment was crafted to confront and overcome the very same attacks on Americans’ God-given rights as we are presently witnessing. It has nothing to do with firing rate in practice sessions. It has nothing to do with hunting or sport shooting in any form.
It has everything to do with protecting America from an oppressive government like the one we have today.


20 posted on 01/11/2013 4:34:58 AM PST by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2013: Still seeking change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Gingrey: I think I will be primaried out in 2014

These PhonyCon Liberals just won’t stop


21 posted on 01/11/2013 4:52:27 AM PST by SeminoleCounty (Fiscal Conservatives are Neither)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Just another GOP person willing to “compromise” in order to not be demonized. Which we all know is stupid because they are already demonized.


22 posted on 01/11/2013 4:53:39 AM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

His district ends JUST short of where I live. I will still call him and make up an address.


23 posted on 01/11/2013 5:02:04 AM PST by Lazamataz (LAZ'S LAW: As an argument with liberals goes on, the probability of being called racist approaches 1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

These huge magazines make it rough on the shooter, Lets go with belt fed weapons.


24 posted on 01/11/2013 5:38:22 AM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

...For what purpose?” Gingrey asked. “I would be willing to listen to the possibility of the capacity of a magazine.”..

hey a$$ clown when the police and military have high capacity magazines we should have them too, because 1 its our right and 2 we may need them to fight tyrants who’s mercenaries have them. even the playing field..no home team advantage.

now show me how many murderers actually used high capacity magazines as compared to hammers fists etc. should we limit people to one hammer or one arm? yeah thats the ticket make everyone cut off one arm...give me a reason not to allow them dont make me show you why I should have them...

he needs to get some response in large numbers right now...someone tell him for what purpose we should have them since he is too ignorant to already know.. let him listen till his ears start burning and smoke is coming out of them from information coming from constituents.

want a high capaity magazine ban, I want a high capacity ban on laws coming from Congress cut their days in half their pay in half and their tenure in half and restrict them to 10 laws per session....its obvious the more days and laws they pass the more damage they do so cut them off.


25 posted on 01/11/2013 1:27:40 PM PST by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

RINO

Gingrey gained notoriety when he ran afoul of conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh in January 2009 when he criticized an editorial comment wherein Limbaugh accused the Republican leadership of appeasing popular President Barack Obama. Limbaugh stated on his radio program that “He (Obama) is obviously more frightened of me (Limbaugh) than he is of Mitch McConnell. He’s more frightened of me, than he is of say, John Boehner, which doesn’t say much about our party.” Gingrey then came to the defense of the Republican leaders, saying that Limbaugh should “back off” and further commenting “I think that our leadership, Mitch McConnell and John Boehner, are taking the right approach. I mean, it’s easy if you’re Sean Hannity or Rush Limbaugh or even sometimes Newt Gingrich to stand back and throw bricks. You don’t have to try to do what’s best for your people or your party.” Gingrey’s office was immediately flooded with complaints from Limbaugh’s followers, and he promptly arranged to appear as a guest on the Limbaugh show and apologized, saying, “Rush, thank you so much. I thank you for the opportunity, of course this is not exactly the way to I wanted to come on. … Mainly, I want to express to you and all your listeners my very sincere regret for those comments I made yesterday to Politico. … I clearly ended up putting my foot in my mouth with some of those comments, and I just wanted to tell you, Rush, and all the ‘conservative giants’ who help us so much to maintain our base and grow it and get back this majority that I regret those stupid comments.”[4

paging Rush Limbaugh please pick up the courtesy phone...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phil_Gingrey


26 posted on 01/11/2013 1:30:33 PM PST by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson