Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush Limbaugh: I'm Not Your Problem, GOP
The Excellence In Broadcasting Network ^ | February 21, 2013 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 02/22/2013 1:43:36 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: There's this ongoing battle about me being too conservative for the Republican Party and too powerful, and the Republican Party is scared of me, and nobody will stand up to me, and they're not gonna get anywhere until they have the guts to stand up to me because I'm too conservative and they need to be more moderate. They need to move to the center, but I won't let them. But really, how powerful am I? How good am I? And then people are out there saying, "Look at Limbaugh's track record in presidential races. He's 1-for-6."

In the first place I'm 3-for-6, but the whole premise is flawed because I don't pick a single candidate. I am not in charge of any candidate anywhere and his campaign. I don't choose the consultants. I don't choose the ad people. I've got nothing to do -- and never have had anything to do -- with one election in this country. Zilch, zero, nada. So this is the kind of thing I'm talking about. This is the kind of stuff that is just infantile, and it's insulting, and it's insulting to everybody's intelligence... --snip--

On the Republican side, it's not just truth. Sarah Palin wasn't wrong about anything. She didn't lie about anything. Sarah Palin embarrassed some people. So they had to get rid of her. The point is, the Republicans will not circle the wagons and defend very many. Conservatives will not circle the wagons and defend. Now, I defended Clarence Thomas not even knowing who he was 'cause I knew what happened. I knew the libs were lying about him because I know the libs.

There are some conservatives today, if Clarence Thomas was accused today about Anita Hill, would throw him overboard....

(Excerpt) Read more at rushlimbaugh.com ...


TOPICS: Issues; Parties; State and Local
KEYWORDS: demagogicparty; democrats; gop; palin; partisanmediashills; republicans; rushlimbaugh; sarahpalin; sequester; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-57 next last
Comments?
1 posted on 02/22/2013 1:43:41 AM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
There are some conservatives today, if Clarence Thomas was accused today about Anita Hill, would throw him overboard....
Anyone that would bail on Clarence Thomas is not a true Conservative.
2 posted on 02/22/2013 1:53:04 AM PST by Bratch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I have been a Rush fan for as long as I can remember, certainly before Dan’s Bake Sale.
I agree with most everything he says.
Thanks to my DAR.FM I can listen to Rush every day from here in Asia, at anytime that I want.


3 posted on 02/22/2013 1:54:48 AM PST by AlexW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Rush is right.

As always.

Don’t doubt me.


4 posted on 02/22/2013 2:05:22 AM PST by Jemian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I’ve listened to Rush off and on since 1989.

He has alwsys maintained that Republicans lose elections when they are not conservative enough. Moderation, for Republicans, is the kiss of death.

We need more Republicans who won’t take crap from media people. One of the reasons Newt Gingrich is popular among conservatives is that he hits back, he gives as well as he gets in debates and interviews. He isn’t popular with those folks who are deeply moral, want Christian purity, and are concious of outward appearances.

One of the greatest risks in our political system is the person who changes after being elected to an office. The conservative who morphs into a political moderate is every conservative’s nightmare but that is the reality of wheeler-dealer politics in Washington - sometimes you have to give a little to gain a bit. Unfortunately, over time the giving-in comes to dominate and the reciprocal votes disappear.

Right now the biggest threat to our nation is the big money being spread around by international banksters. They buy politicians and judge and God only know who!


5 posted on 02/22/2013 2:14:54 AM PST by SatinDoll (NATURAL BORN CITZEN: BORN IN THE USA OF CITIZEN PARENTS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

>>We need more Republicans who won’t take crap from media people. One of the reasons Newt Gingrich is popular among conservatives is that he hits back, he gives as well as he gets in debates and interviews.

Spot on, and worth saying again.

In the 2012 primaries I was initially for Herman Cain, and then later Newt, for exactly this reason. It is why I am fast becoming a big fan of Senator Cruz.

We must have candidates who can take on the media. Dole and Romney show us why the alternative is a disaster.


6 posted on 02/22/2013 2:44:02 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

>> Right now the biggest threat to our nation is ...

The dominant Leftwing component of mainstream “journalism”.


7 posted on 02/22/2013 2:45:16 AM PST by Gene Eric (The Palin Doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Wow I am so tired of hearing/reading Republicans and other conservatives arguing among themselves in the hearing of the Dems and the entire world.

I see that Correa won in Ecuador against SEVEN opponents. There were seven of them because they had no PLAN and couldn’t organize or agree among themselves about what the alternative should be.

Until we understand unity and omerta, can we please stop the endless soul-searching in public? I am SO sick of the endless analysis and op-eds and breast-beating while the Dems just keep playing their same old tune: Give the store away and eat up the profits and the seed corn too while you’re at it and get re-elected.

Please can we get a simple, coherent message together and shut up until we do?


8 posted on 02/22/2013 2:48:10 AM PST by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The founding fathers were ultra conservatives. ‘nuff said.


9 posted on 02/22/2013 2:49:07 AM PST by exnavy (Fish or cut bait ...Got ammo, Godspeed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

MSM “journalism” has been described as the PR component of the liberal Democrat political operation.

It’s the other way around. Liberal Democrats are the political component of MSM journalism. That’s where the nest is.


10 posted on 02/22/2013 2:59:27 AM PST by abb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bratch

“Anyone that would bail on Clarence Thomas is not a true Conservative.”

I think that is the entire point. The gope hates our guts. We ‘embarrass’ them.
A couple of words come to mind but I can only say one. **** YOU!!!


11 posted on 02/22/2013 3:08:13 AM PST by MestaMachine (Sometimes the smartest man in the room is standing in the midst of imbeciles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Rush obviously does a lot of good.

But he goes astray IMO in two directions:

1) Backing and sucking up to GOPe players like the Bushes, right or wrong, and

2) With an offputtingly blind spot and style when deriding liberal women, such as calling Sandra Fluke a ‘slut’. He does needlessly alienate moderate women and give ammunition to the opposition with such antics.

So, yes, he would be more effective for the cause if he’d back more tea party, grassroots conservatives, but be less offensive to women while doing so.


12 posted on 02/22/2013 3:09:03 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: firebrand

>>lease can we get a simple, coherent message together and shut up until we do?<<

For some inexpiable reason, we Conservatives suffer consistently and constantly from Massive Error in Thinking #1: We Must Be Perfect. Thus we Must Kill Good to ensure Perfect Reigns..


13 posted on 02/22/2013 3:15:18 AM PST by freedumb2003 (I learned everything I needed to know about racism from Colin Powell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

That’s part of it. It’s also that we’re really the intelligent party—too intelligent for our own good. We’re all geniuses. We’ve got to stop trying to prove we’re the smartest person in the room and get practical-smart.


14 posted on 02/22/2013 3:21:53 AM PST by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The problem isn’t conservatives being too conservative. It is capitalist liberals pretending to be conservative. Liberal MO can be clearly seen in actions against Catholic church.

Soros and company have spent millions in creating fake Catholic organizations, infiltrating the Catholic media, and distorting the church’s message in public media. http://www.aim.org/aim-column/atheist-soros-funds-catholic-groups/

They initially appeal to nobler motives such as helping the poor, health care access, etc., then they subliminally distort messages such abortion, and other clear teachings of the church, they become activists, they criticize, and then complain about how “outdated” the church is demanding “change”. http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/canon-lawyer-bishop-has-warned-national-catholic-reporter/

For example, National “CATHOLIC” Reporter has been funded by Soros groups and serves no other purpose than to criticize the church and to paint a negative picture. Then the secular media endlessly recycles old cases of abuse and never misses an opportunity to deceptively associate abuse issues with any current news such as the Pope’s retirment. You would never know it, but abuse in the Catholic church was no more prevalent than any other organization, today it is less so.

The church gets in the way of their agenda and so do real conservatives. The Tea Party and Limbaugh are getting the Catholic treatment. We do have to support each other, and come together under our common belief in God.


15 posted on 02/22/2013 3:24:51 AM PST by mgist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The problem isn’t conservatives being too conservative. It is capitalist liberals pretending to be conservative. Liberal MO can be clearly seen in actions against Catholic church.

Soros and company have spent millions in creating fake Catholic organizations, infiltrating the Catholic media, and distorting the church’s message in public media. http://www.aim.org/aim-column/atheist-soros-funds-catholic-groups/

They initially appeal to nobler motives such as helping the poor, health care access, etc., then they subliminally distort messages such abortion, and other clear teachings of the church, they become activists, they criticize, and then complain about how “outdated” the church is demanding “change”. http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/canon-lawyer-bishop-has-warned-national-catholic-reporter/

For example, National “CATHOLIC” Reporter has been funded by Soros groups and serves no other purpose than to criticize the church and to paint a negative picture. Then the secular media endlessly recycles old cases of abuse and never misses an opportunity to deceptively associate abuse issues with any current news such as the Pope’s retirment. You would never know it, but abuse in the Catholic church was no more prevalent than any other organization, today it is less so.

The church gets in the way of their agenda and so do real conservatives. The Tea Party and Limbaugh are getting the Catholic treatment. We do have to support each other, and come together under our common belief in God.


16 posted on 02/22/2013 3:24:51 AM PST by mgist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: firebrand

>>That’s part of it. It’s also that we’re really the intelligent party—too intelligent for our own good. We’re all geniuses. We’ve got to stop trying to prove we’re the smartest person in the room and get practical-smart.
<<

I have always believed that is art of Rush’s “reach.” He doesn’t talk “up” and he doesn’t talk “down.” He consistently looks his audience in the face and says “here is how I see what is (1+1, PiR2, QQQ, etc.”)

Rush has always been honest that way. Even for the dimwits on the left he always walks the concept and the logic.

Isn’t it funny that when the left attacks him they do it out of context? And inevitably Rush must only hit the “replay” button

That alone has always been the price of admission.


17 posted on 02/22/2013 3:38:34 AM PST by freedumb2003 (I learned everything I needed to know about racism from Colin Powell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

18 posted on 02/22/2013 4:08:58 AM PST by Howie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

1. Yes you are correct on Rush and his supporting Bush I and II. The Bush’s are not conservative....and share most of the same Liberal Globalist ideas as Clinton and Obama. Gosh, the Bush Family should have ran the Borders bookstore chain.....because the Bush Family would never close a Border.

2. Rush was correct to go after Sandra Fluke. Fluke’s comments made it sound like every young woman was just a “U-Haul for sperm” and needed free birth control like a fat kid needed cake. The Liberal Media just wanted to go after Limbaugh for any reason. I doubt even most liberal women felt comfortable w Fluke’s comments. Rush even ended up with more support and higher show ratings after the Liberal Media attacked him.


19 posted on 02/22/2013 4:12:31 AM PST by SeminoleCounty (GOP = Greenlighting Obama's Programs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

Again, Rush was right. Sandra is/was a slut. Do the math! Any woman who needs to purchase that much birth control annually must be getting serviced by many men per week. That is the quintessential definition of the word.


20 posted on 02/22/2013 4:27:22 AM PST by Jemian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

Dole & Romney were GOP choices... The GOP villainized Palin and then eliminated Herman Cain as a candidate because they knew both of them would at least attempt to change Washington, The GOP does want control, as long as our option is somebody they can control, but they dont want Washington changed any more than the libs do!


21 posted on 02/22/2013 4:50:32 AM PST by AzNASCARfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AzNASCARfan

Cain was in it as a ‘conservative’ spoiler, and only brought down once he got too big for his britches. He plays the game, and he was playing.


22 posted on 02/22/2013 4:56:59 AM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: abb
Liberal Democrats are the political component of MSM journalism. That’s where the nest is.

Absolutely CORRECT! Which is why I've said for years now that when the revolution starts (and that's not a matter of "if" it's only a matter of time ... "when") first thing we should do is target the media for elimination.

The lamestream media is nothing more than the propaganda arm of the DemoKKKrat Party. Kill them first, stop the propaganda, then the rest of the war is completely winnable.

Just my .02 (see tagline.)

23 posted on 02/22/2013 5:10:49 AM PST by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: usconservative
The lamestream media is nothing more than the propaganda arm of the DemoKKKrat Party.

I still say its the other way around. Democrats do what THE MEDIA tell them to do.

24 posted on 02/22/2013 5:14:25 AM PST by abb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: AzNASCARfan

Exactly so, except change GOP to GOPe.

There are a lot of areas where TEA Party-influenced real conservatives have made great strides in taking over the GOP.


25 posted on 02/22/2013 5:19:06 AM PST by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The GOP is its own problem.


26 posted on 02/22/2013 5:20:31 AM PST by bmwcyle (People who do not study history are destine to believe really ignorant statements.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The Flag-burning Regressives try to keep tying the GOP to Limbaugh. However, the only time the Party actually DID listen to Limbaugh was during the 1994 elections, when they swept to power in an unprecedented wave. Maybe in 2010, when people were listening to Limbaugh and took back the House and won over 700 elected seats nationwide.

Maybe the GOP needs to start listening to the Doctor of Democracy.

27 posted on 02/22/2013 5:26:50 AM PST by MuttTheHoople (Pray for Joe Biden- Proverbs 29:9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster
Also Rand Paul is making a good case for himself. He's actually on the news shows talking about the fallacy of baseline budgeting and the "cuts" in the "rate of increase".

What the GOP needs is someone who'll FIGHT!

28 posted on 02/22/2013 5:31:45 AM PST by MuttTheHoople (Pray for Joe Biden- Proverbs 29:9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

Until they change the primary system to allow all states to participate, this is all an intellectual exercise significant of nothing. The current practice allows the elite to continue controlling the outcome by forcing a prolonged fight that erodes the candidates’ ability to continue the fight until all states have a chance to have a say.

In Minnesota, we vote either “Me, too!” or stay home. We don’t have another choice. I wish I cared about this talk of what Conservatives must do or not do.


29 posted on 02/22/2013 5:55:00 AM PST by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jemian

Is that you, Rush?


30 posted on 02/22/2013 5:56:55 AM PST by freedomfiter2 (Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Rush is correcto...but being correct isnt enough these days. Id suggest we all make constant contact with the RINO scum at the local, state and national levels..let em know how you feel.

Im actually more active now than before the last election..and Im out of the country!!!!


31 posted on 02/22/2013 5:57:10 AM PST by rrrod (at home in Medellin Colombia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The Democrats and MSM chose our candidates in the last two elections, the kind of “to get along, you go along” and you must compromise but not the liberals. Next election, we need a fighter.


32 posted on 02/22/2013 6:14:42 AM PST by CORedneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

The Fourth Estate is a Fifth Column.

It has lost its function.

There is no check and balance on the system when a single party controls both houses of Congress as it does in everything but name, and the Presidency, and the press, and the electoral process.

If we cannot have fair and free elections in the USA, we are no longer a Republic in anything but name. We cannot control who votes, or how many times. We cannot verify any vote, either at the time or later. We cannot prosecute anyone except for low level and meaningless violations of voting law. We cannot limit poll reporting until all votes are in to avoid fraud. We cannot remove people from the roles if they are not citizens, or if they are dead, or if they are criminals.

Neither party is trying to correct the one thing which would correct all others. Even the political parties have agreed not to challenge the fraud of each other’s workers. Who does that? People from the same team, that’s who.

My question: If the GOPe is willing to sacrifice a term or two of the presidency to put down the tea party rebellion, just what exactly is the agenda that they are seeking once they can run an undivided party that differs from what the tea party wants? Can someone tell me where the difference is? I think it is a matter of the old guard not wanted to lose their sinecure. What a sad day if they were willing to take us all down.

But, it happens all over the world. Why would we not suffer from the same greed as the rest of the world.

At least going from Uganda to South Sudan, you may at least have to give the guard a bottle of water. I would rather have that decree of graft that the level we now have in this country. I can’t afford it.


33 posted on 02/22/2013 6:15:03 AM PST by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Jemian

>>Again, Rush was right. Sandra is/was a slut. Do the math! <<

He is/was 100% dead-on (and Rush let us down when he backed off).

OBJECTIVELY, let us look at the proposition (OK, these jokes keep writing themselves):

Let us posit Woman A of medium to low beauty, let us call her “Filandra Socks.” She possesses the accouterments born to females. She can choose to utilize these accouterments as follows:

1. She can remain chaste and keep her “lady parts” for the One True Love and stand before God and pray that He smiles upon and blesses her sanctified Union. The results of this sanctified union are called “children” and are the REASON marriages exist.

2. She can find gentlemen who meet a sufficiency of her criteria for acceptable rubbing of genital organs. Sexual practices with no regard for the results can create “bastards.” Should a bastard result from her pleasuring herself, Filandera can resort to the courts, wholly owned by the Femninatzis whose sole purpose for existence is to destroy men. They have established a mechanism to do just that with gleeful abandon.

3. She can use said methods to continue her sexual proclivities and hope for the best, demanding the taxpayer pay to inhibit the natural results of her wanton activities. Should Fialndria continue to pursue her wanton ways and demand her simple animalistic drives be SUBSIDIZED, we can and should assign monetary value to her activities. This is called “prostitution” (money for sex). It may pain Nancy (”George”) Pelosi to hear it, but paying for sexual favors is written into virtually every State code. It is universally called “prostitution.”

Let the liberals fall where they may.


34 posted on 02/22/2013 6:19:49 AM PST by freedumb2003 (I learned everything I needed to know about racism from Colin Powell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: LachlanMinnesota

The GOPe has one huge problem:

They support globalization. They support sending American jobs abroad.

That is an increasingly huge problem. America is no longer the largest exporter in the world. Now that is China. Who supplies things back to AMERICA.

The thing is, everything we buy from China builds China up more, because everything is owned in “half plus 1%” by China. So all the exporting streaming out of China now, is all growing China.

This is a huge problem.

America needs to bring home manufacturing now.

All of it.


35 posted on 02/22/2013 6:23:18 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Amen and Amen. Start with weaps and ammo.


36 posted on 02/22/2013 6:37:03 AM PST by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Rush has been trying to say since last summer that the Republican party is corrupted and does not represent conservatives. It represents itself, its power and fortunes. He is correct.


37 posted on 02/22/2013 6:58:26 AM PST by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bratch

bump


38 posted on 02/22/2013 7:03:03 AM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

Newt is great in a debate, but when he gets back in DC he falls back into the RINO mold and supports most every lib democrat-lite talking point out there, i.e. global warming, amnesty, welfare, state-run healthcare, etc.


39 posted on 02/22/2013 7:09:55 AM PST by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

Newt is great in a debate, but when he gets back in DC he falls back into the RINO mold and supports most every lib democrat-lite talking point out there, i.e. global warming, amnesty, welfare, state-run healthcare, etc.


40 posted on 02/22/2013 7:15:28 AM PST by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

“We must have candidates who can take on the media.”

Today’s backstabbing media is worse than the East German Stasi. Bud sadly the media is the message, and talk radio can’t compete with the visual media’s propaganda and pablum to the low information voter.

The Left constantly engages in mock ridicule and feigned PC victimization. Even the Rush of Reason can’t combat that.

Gregg Gutfeld’s Red Eye is RushTV, and is the best program that can reach the LIV. It mocks and ridicules them back and comes on at the LIV’s prime time viewing hours.

I thoroughly enjoy listening to Rush, but he was late to the Savage message of Language Borders Culture. He thought he could educate us back to sanity, but the Stasi media has poured so much hate and division in this country that no one listens.


41 posted on 02/22/2013 7:16:24 AM PST by A'elian' nation (Political correctness does not legislate tolerance; it only organizes hatred. Jacques Barzun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

re: “But he goes astray IMO in two directions:

1) Backing and sucking up to GOP players like the Bushes, right or wrong,”

This is incorrect. I can’t speak for what Rush said about Bush 41 in the 1988 election because I didn’t start listening to him until 1989, but yes, he did support Bush 41 against Bill Clinton - there was no Republican primary in 1992 because Bush 41 was a sitting president. So, I don’t think it’s quite fair to say Rush “supported only Bushes” in 1992 since Bush 41 was the only Republican candidate against Clinton.

In 2000, I don’t recall him preferring any candidate during the primary process (nor in any election for that matter) - he did support statements from all the candidates when those statements supported conservative values. I do recall Rush questioning Bush 42’s so called “compassionate conservatism” early on in the primary, but other than that - he waited until the primary was decided before he openly supported the Republican candidate.

Bush 42 ran against Algore in 2000. I didn’t want Algore to be president. I preferred Bush 42 over Algore. So did Rush. I much preferred Bush W leading our nation after the 9/11 attacks rather than Algore. Yes, W blew it big time on other issues - would Algore have done better?

Rush has consistently supported conservative values and principles. You support the candidates that are closest to those values over the one who is furthest. I know this always angers the conservative “puritans” who always take their ball and go home if they don’t get the pet candidate they wanted.

All I remember on Free Republic during this time (and in the last election) was many “puritans” bashing every single Republican candidate as not being a “true conservative” or being “unelectable” or “couldn’t stand their own in a debate”, or this one is a “quitter” or that on is too “immoral” and not Christian enough, etc.

Conservatives always shoot themselves in the foot because they argue so much with each other that a strong, solid unity usually never occurs. I honestly believe that if Reagan had run in 2008, there would have been many on this site claiming he wasn’t a true conservative.


42 posted on 02/22/2013 8:01:57 AM PST by rusty schucklefurd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rusty schucklefurd

You could argue about whether or not Reagan was a true conservative.....but Reagan had a gift that won over people that didn’t necessarily agree with him on all of the issues.....currently there is no such candidate in the GOP. They don’t have nearly the political savvy that Reagan did. It’s not enough to be right on the issues, they also have to project themselves as a good leader. And there was nobody in the GOP fold the last campaign that fit that.


43 posted on 02/22/2013 8:07:42 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: rusty schucklefurd

Rush has consistently supported conservative values and principles. You support the candidates that are closest to those values over the one who is furthest. I know this always angers the conservative “puritans” who always take their ball and go home if they don’t get the pet candidate they wanted.

doesn’t sound like you were happy here in a past life, maybe it’s just me, you should study some history of track records of folk like Rush and such.

-JMO-

I think back to the 2003 Recall in California and how Rush just couldn’t openly endorse McClintock or say his name, something Hannity and Hewitt and other “conservatives” talk show hosts had no problem with doing as they backed Schwarzenkennedy openly.

Would Reagan have lost in 2008? Is FR full of ‘scoundrels’ (as you describe more than a few here)? obviously you prefer a nice clean process.. so would more than a few here as well. damn ‘puritans.

but then, I invoke Hillary.. ‘What difference does it make?’

as for the Bush dynasty.. when is enough enough? until the
NWO is official and globally established? sorry, rusty, your dog don’t hunt.


44 posted on 02/22/2013 9:49:44 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: abb
I still say its the other way around. Democrats do what THE MEDIA tell them to do.

Fair enough. I say you and I resolve this difference of opinion between us as follows:

Line up all the Democrats and Lamestream Media against the wall;

Mow 'em down.

Problem solved.

45 posted on 02/22/2013 10:32:51 AM PST by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

Indeed. We couldn’t sort them into one group or the other - dead or alive.


46 posted on 02/22/2013 10:37:26 AM PST by abb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network
I generally agree. It was a liberal Republican (Nixon) who sold America’s interests out to the Chinese. I say this as a free trader. I believe in free trade and the marketplace; however, as Duncan Hunter made clear, China does not trade fairly. They cheat, they steal our technologies and are allowed to do this while we cheer them on.
47 posted on 02/22/2013 10:51:32 AM PST by Sam Gamgee (May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: MuttTheHoople

Please.

Like his old man, who wanted to return to a true Constitutional Republic and who warned of the housing bubble, the Fed, etc., he was excoriated, worse so much here, for his World Police/drug policy that those same people turned around and ‘held their nose’ for a pro-gay, anti-2nd, NE liberal flip-flopper, Mitt.

And you expect they will treat the son as an independant man? One of the apples that falls close enough to the tree, but not TOO close?

More than likely, if they have a (R) after their name, no matter how ‘centrist’ or Dem-lite, they’ll vote for ‘em anyway...Gotta WIN, y’know!?


48 posted on 02/22/2013 11:46:41 AM PST by i_robot73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

I suggest you view the documentary, The Money Masters. Even communists bitch about how they have to kow-tow to the financiers/banksters, and mainstream journalism is no different. Every major media company is owned by the international or national financiers who control the news.

The documentary can be purchased on Ebay, viewed for free on youtube (poor quality), or you can buy it at the following:

http://www.themoneymasters.com

Seeing this DVD caused a paradigm shift in my understanding of historical events and what is happening in this country NOW!

If you have a dollar bill in your wallet, take it out and read what it says across the top: Federal Reserve Note. This is cheeky of the Federal Reserve Bank because it is privately owned and is not a part of the Federal government.

Our government doesn’t print its own money. The Federal Reserve Bank is owned by U.S. central banks which in turn are owned by corporations or front companies or individuals who do not want you to know that they print money out of thin air - nothing backing those notes - and provide it in exchange for Treasury Bonds which are interest bearing.

Every dollar our government receives involves a debt we citizens must pay to the bankstars.

Bill Still narrates the DVD and he is leading a campaign to change the monetary system in our nation.


49 posted on 02/22/2013 12:29:03 PM PST by SatinDoll (NATURAL BORN CITZEN: BORN IN THE USA OF CITIZEN PARENTS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MestaMachine
The GOP can rot in Hell as far as I am concerned, if they wanted to fix their problems they wouldn't be the first out of the gate to attack Sarah Palin or Michele Bachmann everytime they speak the truth about the GOP's Liberal "Friends"

Sarah, Michele and You Mesta all scare the hell out of the good ole boys club and that is a good thing!


50 posted on 02/22/2013 1:17:09 PM PST by KC_Lion (Build the America you want to live in at your address, and keep looking up.-Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson