Sen. Claire McCaskill now supports gay marriage

The Washington Times ^ | March 25, 2013 | Cheryl K. Chumley

[Vigilanteman]

Sorry, no. All the money in the world wouldn't save an idiot too stupid to take the rape exception question bait from the MSM. There are too many dumb, low information voters among the electorate to overlook a gaffe that serious. Look what happened in Indiana to Murdouck. Provide the MSM with the requisite sound byte and it instantly becomes the only issue in the election.

Anyone who can't figure that out shouldn't be running for political office above the county level.

[Joe Boucher]

Sooo,
How are these folks gonna react when they come home to find some old queen trying to seduce their teenaged boys?
Someone like obammy??

[Ingtar]

The other side of it, and what I was arguing, was that the GOP handling of it doomed the seat as much or more than anything he did. To the misinformation voter, hearing that both sides don’t like the guy kills him.

[Vigilanteman]

It's a catch-22, because if the GOP had rallied around him, there would have been more collateral damage elsewhere.

We probably lost close senate seats in North Dakota and Montana as a result of Aikin and Murdouck's collateral damage.

I won't say it made a difference in the outcome at the top of the ticket but Florida, at least, was close enough to have swung the other way without these idiots taking the rape exception bait.

[Tennessee Nana]

Thanks a lot Willard..

Your ugly big mouth didnt help the GOP for this seat...

[highball]

“If you look at the marriage age in Missouri (14 with parents permission), can a 23 y/o male marry a 14 y/o boy, Clare?”

Is that really the law? I think that’s creepy even between a man and a girl.

[ExCTCitizen]

I think it is 16 in Missouri, but in some states it is 14...(with parents permission)