Skip to comments.Iowa Divided: Civil War Threatens the State's GOP
Posted on 07/26/2013 6:49:34 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Des Moines, Iowa The front line of the Republican civil war may be Grand Avenue, a hilly road that cuts through the heart of Iowas biggest city.
On one side of the street is the gold-domed state capitol, home to Republican Terry Branstad, Iowas longest-serving governor. On the other side is a weathered brick building housing the Iowa GOP, which is chaired by A. J. Spiker and David Fischer. Both men are faithful allies of Ron Paul, the retired Texas congressman who twice ran for the Republican presidential nomination.
These days, relations between the two camps are as messy as eating a deep-fried Snickers bar at the Iowa state fair. Iowa Republicans increasingly find themselves either part of Big Liberty, the libertarian bloc led by Spiker and Fischer, or members of Branstads center-right circle.
Confidants of both groups say the tensions have nearly crippled the party, which is known for hosting the Iowa Republican caucuses. Branstad doesnt trust the co-chairmen, and the co-chairmen dont trust the governor. Behind the scenes, they quarrel constantly over cash and politics, and many veteran Iowa Republicans fear the infighting will embarrass them, especially as presidential contenders start to fly in for appearances. Its a pretty bad situation, says Bob Haus, an Iowa-based Republican consultant. Theyve been at loggerheads for over a year. Traditionally, sitting governors enjoy collegiality with their party and work together to achieve important goals, but none of that has happened here. Theyre not coordinating much of anything, from fundraising to strategy.
If youre a Branstad person, youre donating to Branstads expected 2014 reelection campaign; youre not donating to the party, explains an Iowa Republican insider. If youre a Ron Paul supporter or an anti-establishment Republican, youre donating to what should be the establishment, the state party, which is controlled almost entirely by your friends. Thats where we stand. The lines are drawn, and theyre unlikely to go away.
Sources who work within the state GOP say the co-chairmen are furious; they believe that Branstad is maneuvering to put his associates on the state committee and, in the meantime, keep donors away. Branstads crew says the governor is angry about rumors of plans to kick members of his administration off next years Republican ticket.
Hostility over the emerging 2016 Republican presidential field is another cloud that hangs over the cornfields. All we hear is that the party has become a conspiracy to help Rand Paul get elected president, says an operative who works with Spiker and Fischer. It really pisses us off. Some of us may like Rand, but were not going to ruin the caucuses and our reputations to do that.
Spiker was elected chairman in February 2012, soon after the 2012 Iowa caucuses, which were a disaster for the state party. Rick Santorum won the contest by a hair, but Mitt Romney was declared the winner by party chairman Matt Strawn. After that episode, Strawn left his post, creating an opening.
Spiker, who had a sprawling network from working for Ron Pauls presidential campaign, jumped in and promptly won the chairmanship, upsetting Branstads pick, Bill Schickel. A year later he was reelected, and tapped Fischer to assist him.
In an interview at the state capitol, Branstad acknowledges the rift, and worries about the direction of the state GOP. There is some concern that you have one faction, and the party should be there to support everybody, all the candidates, he says. Im a big-tent Republican. I want to include everybody, but we have some people who dont.
Branstad says the Spiker-Fischer coalition focuses too much on purifying the ranks rather than building the partys numbers, both in the legislature and at the bank. Their efforts, he argues, have turned the party away from the successful model established by Branstad himself and longtime Republican senator Chuck Grassley over the past four decades.
When I started in politics, Branstad recalls, it was the moderates who controlled everything, and I was the conservative. But my approach wasnt to throw them all out. Instead, I said, I want you to stay.
Fischer, in an interview at his office, pushes back hard against Branstads analysis. I resent being pigeonholed as someone who only supports Ron Paul, he tells me. Now, Ron Paul is a good friend of mine and remains a good friend, and I support him without reservation. But I was an Iowa Republican long before Ron Paul ran for president.
People can say whatever they want, but Im happy with what weve done with the party, Fischer continues. Weve unapologetically worked with the grassroots to advance our founding principles. Thats our job description. I didnt run to be a leader of this party just so I could be a cheerleader for anybody who happens to hang an R behind their name.
A breaking point came earlier this year when the Republican-controlled state legislature was debating a new gas tax. Branstad was open to the tax, and didnt expect the state partys officials to weigh in on policy matters. When Spiker did, sending warning letters to Republican lawmakers, Branstad and his advisers effectively decided to cut ties.
There has also been continued warring over the future of the Ames straw poll for Republican presidential candidates, a major party fundraiser every four years. Wannabe presidents gather in a parking lot at Iowa State University, cook hot dogs, serve funnel cake, and shake hands. Branstad wants to end the tradition, but Spiker and Fischer want to keep it going, and perhaps even expand it.
Its the most fun you can have in politics and a boost to our party, Fischer says. I dont understand why some people want to kill it, or say its lost its usefulness. Its still a wonderful way to unite the party and meet the candidates.
When I mention the Spiker-Fischer teams love for the straw poll, Branstad rolls his eyes. Its a costly circus, a fundraising gimmick for the state party, he says. Straw polls are not reliable indicators of whos going to have the ability to win the caucuses, so its usually a waste of time. I want to protect the integrity of the caucuses, not the straw poll.
The upcoming Republican primary for the U.S. Senate seat currently held by Democrat Tom Harkin, who has announced that he is retiring at the end of this term, is the latest area of contention. Branstad was hoping that his lieutenant governor, Kim Reynolds, would run, but the co-chairmen werent enthusiastic, and she ultimately decided to sit out the campaign. The primary has since become crowded, and theres buzz that Fischer or another Paul-aligned leader will run.
Its very possible that Branstad World could lose that battle. Per party rules, if no candidate gets more than 35 percent in a primary, the nomination is thrown to a convention. Spiker and Fischer would wield enormous influence over that process. Branstad may be the states top Republican, but he doesnt control the party.
And so it goes. Republicans may come here from far and wide, but up on Grand Avenue, theyre reluctant to cross the street.
Robert Costa is National Reviews Washington editor.
I’ve always been a party-first person, but it is becoming clear the GOP is a dying organization. They are rejecting any principled objectives, and are so corrupted by poor strategy ideas, I am becoming convinced that (short of a resurgent leader like a Reagan), it is done. In fact, it seems the entrenched machine will destroy any resurgent Reagan-like leader.
While the Dems must be salivating at the thought of a GOP civil war, it’s becoming clear to me that war will be absolutely necessary before we conservatives can take back our party.
I always stop reading at “center right.”
Welcome to reality.
Or, we could quit letting the same two states decide our candidates every cycle. Might calm things down a bit.
Just a reminder of how the GOP-E cheats to get their liberal on the ticket. It's also why I won't vote for a liberal (R).
It’s a shame because a golden opportunity to pick up Harkin’s seat may be pissed away due to infighting.
Gee, Republicans acting like.......Oh, I don’t know.......Democrats!
If we had a closed primary system for all GOP primaries, we could eliminate establishment Republicans real quick.
No lie. Why Iowa gets the privilege of being the first contest in the GOP race is beyond reason. The caucus is a weird system. In recent elections, it hasn’t forecast either the nominee or even the most electable candidate nationwide...and it usually goes blue anyway. It’s no bellweather predictor, just a weird first stop that takes time and money. It has become a distraction rather than an opportunity. And the same complaints could be issued about New Hampshire!
> “People can say whatever they want, but Im happy with what weve done with the party, Fischer continues. Weve unapologetically worked with the grassroots to advance our founding principles. Thats our job description. I didnt run to be a leader of this party just so I could be a cheerleader for anybody who happens to hang an R behind their name.”
Perfect. This is what we need nationally. Fischer should run for Harkin’s Senate seat.
Both sides are off kilter.
There needs to be a split in the GOP....I would hope the Texas Delegation would be the one to get the ball rolling.
Texas should be the first primary....no other state provides the guaranteed electoral votes for the GOP candidate, even the losers like McLame and Romney. And we have no say in who the nominee will be.
Couldn’t agree more, EV. The primary system in this country is a disgrace.
They will. If it weren't for Nixon's trouble I don't think Reagan would have been allowed to run.
Just about anything would beat the current system. Rotate states every cycle, national primary, you name it. At least that way the Republican Party would have a fighting chance of nominating an actual conservative for President every generation or so.
You have identified the biggest issue and risk. Winning Harkin’s seat has long-term positive consequences for Iowa and the nation.
Although a lot of people complain about Iowa’s position in the election cycle, it actually serves a fairly good purpose. The Iowa caucus gives candidates a chance to test their campaign organizations and fund-gathering potential. Being held in Iowa enables a test of voter behavior that is somewhat similar to voter behavior in a large part of the US, unlike in some other states, e.g., NY or Texas, where voters are more unique. There are problems, too, as when a candidate gains strength in Iowa but is weakened later during campaign season or when a candidate wins in Iowa but really can’t carry other parts of the US. It is a problem for conservatives in that a strong conservative might be more likely to gain strength in, say, Texas than in Iowa.
If there is a war in the Iowa GOP, there is tension in the GOP elsewhere and that may be necessary if the old guard, which has shown it is not able to win the big ones and lacks both conviction and clear values, is to be replaced with a new and strong GOP leadership. The GOP was given a gift when the Tea Party emerged a few years ago and the GOP has not only ignored this new, gift movement which was populated with energized, extremely honorable, and well-behaved traditionalists, and could have revitalized the GOP but has rejected it. That, and the loss of the Presidential elections of 2008 and 2012 should have led to a cleaning house of GOP leadership, but still they run the GOP.
The Dems did not reject the moonbat movement or the occupy movement and those movements are nuts. The old GOP’s foolishness is jaw-dropping.
I see this as a good thing, because it points out the obvious:
1) The leadership is small and liberal, and is trying to cling to power.
2) The rank and file, and now second tier independent leadership is much more conservative, and is tired of the liberal antics of the leadership.
I’d also like to point out that in similar situations, when displaced from power, liberal Republicans quickly turn on their party, and their treachery comes to the fore. They do not lose power graciously.
But the end result is a better party with better candidates, who become much more popular in their state because of their sound policies.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.