Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WaPo: Every Romney donor we’ve spoken to recently wants Jeb Bush for 2016
Hot Air ^ | February 28, 2014 | Allahpundit

Posted on 02/28/2014 9:51:13 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

There’s no way around it. America’s political establishment wants Bush vs. Clinton II.

Is resistance futile?

Every single Romney donor we spoke with this week listed the former Florida governor as their top choice…

Also, with solid name recognition and the Bush political machine behind him, Romney donors believe Jeb is the most electable of the potential Republican candidates. For Romney donors, electability is the single most important trait.

“If Jeb Bush is in the race, he clears the field,” said one major Romney donor. “You would have someone who has the talent that is equal to Mitt. The natural inclination for Mitt supporters would be to gravitate toward Jeb Bush because he’s a candidate that can win a national race.”

Another huge factor that would help Bush — who has contacted some donors about their receptiveness to a presidential bid and is believed to be seriously considering throwing his hat in the ring — is that his current gig as a senior adviser to Barclays Capital has helped him meet many of the Northeastern private equity types who filled Romney’s campaign coffers.

Christie’s Bridgegate crumble is contributing to Bush fee-vah, but like WaPo says, Christie had already burned some bridges with Mittworld by babbling praise for Obama over Sandy relief the weekend before the 2012 election. Bush has been waiting around for Christiemania to cool among Republican centrists, and now it is, so here we are.

Help me understand this, though:

“If Jeb Bush is in the race, he clears the field,” said one major Romney donor.

Which field? Crowning George Bush’s brother the new king of the Beltway Republicans isn’t going to scare tea-party candidates out of the race. Rand Paul would rather face Christie than Bush for various reasons — Bridgegate, lower name recognition, smaller donor network, plus the fact that Christie has antagonized many more Republicans over the last few years than Bush has — but there are advantages to running against Jeb too. Now he gets to attack not just a RINO but a dynastic RINO, whose own mother thinks it’s poor form for the family to monopolize Republican nominations. Paul’s brand is that he’s a new kind of Republican; nothing would underscore that like running against a Bush, which means he might attract some voters who have issues with him but nonetheless want fresh faces in the party’s leadership. (I’m one of them. I like Paul but doubt I’d support him in the primaries — unless we’re given a stark “old guard versus new guard” choice.) And Paul may relish running against Bush even though it would make his task harder. If you want to shift the Republican Party’s foreign policy paradigm to noninterventionism, you can do worse than have George W. Bush’s brother as your opponent.

What the donor quoted by WaPo probably meant was that Bush would clear the centrist field. No more Christie: He’d conclude that he’s too badly damaged to beat a well-funded Jeb and decide to support him instead. No more Rubio: The Florida Republican establishment would swing behind Jeb, leaving Rubio with no operational base. Probably no more Paul Ryan either. Even if he was inclined to run, it’d be hard to make bank with Mitt’s old donors stampeding towards Bush and hard to turn to grassroots righties for support given that they’re peeved at him over amnesty and last year’s budget. But … what about Scott Walker or Bobby Jindal, who seems like he’s quietly building a proto-campaign? They’d make the same calculation that Paul will — that some segment of Republicans will blanch at the thought of nominating another Bush, whether out of objections to dynasticism or because they fear the “Bush” name is unelectable at this point, and jump in. They’d sell themselves as the Goldilocks option, more conservative than Crown Prince Jeb and more mainstream than Paul, and pull donations from both sides of the party. If/when the center and right reach a stalemate on Bush versus Paul, Walker or Jindal will be there as a compromise choice. The field won’t clear, unless your idea of “the field” runs no further to the right than Rubio.


TOPICS: Campaign News; Parties; State and Local
KEYWORDS: 2016; bush; gopdonors; gopestablishment; hillary; jebbush; liberalagenda; rino; romney; romney2decide4ever; romneyagenda; romneycare4ever
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
To: hal ogen
Can you say “write-in anyone but bush””? These rino/gop-e types really are fools.

This crap makes me furious!

Of course Romney had to weigh in!

21 posted on 02/28/2014 10:11:37 PM PST by onyx (Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cheerio
All the GOP "advisers" tell the candidates that you have to win the "moderates" in order to win the election. So that is where they spend all their money and completely ignore the base with the attitude - "where else are they going to go"?
How about stay home? That is what happened in 2012.

They never learn. They're in full-blown denial.

They imagine everyone thinks like they do, and they're dead-bang wrong.

22 posted on 02/28/2014 10:13:32 PM PST by onyx (Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

You forgot Romney/MCCain 2016.


23 posted on 02/28/2014 10:13:56 PM PST by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

Woo hoo! Dole/Ford... oops, I mean Dole/McCain 2016!


24 posted on 02/28/2014 10:15:06 PM PST by Pining_4_TX (All those who were appointed to eternal life believed. Acts 13:48)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Pining_4_TX

Milt had a talent for being milquetoast.


25 posted on 02/28/2014 10:15:32 PM PST by The_Media_never_lie (The media must be defeated any way it can be done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Great. All we need is Theodore Roosevelt and the Republicans can go down like William Howard Taft in 1912.
26 posted on 02/28/2014 10:16:16 PM PST by Prospero (Si Deus trucido mihi, ego etiam fides Deus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark
Either of my Pekin ducks would make a better candidate than Jeb.

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

27 posted on 02/28/2014 10:22:35 PM PST by wku man (We are the 53%! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUXN0GDuLN4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Bush III v Clinton II in 2016


28 posted on 02/28/2014 10:23:11 PM PST by Oliviaforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

They can have whomever they want, but they can’t have my vote.


29 posted on 02/28/2014 10:23:35 PM PST by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chris37

“For Romney donors, electability is the single most important trait.”

Yeah. That’s it. Mitt was just so electable.


30 posted on 02/28/2014 10:25:39 PM PST by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If we don’t do major damage to the DNC this year, it’s not going to matter who they run because I don’t think Barry will leave office.


31 posted on 02/28/2014 10:27:05 PM PST by ponygirl (Be Breitbart.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark

I agree with you OneWing, you would make a better candidate than jeb.


32 posted on 02/28/2014 10:27:27 PM PST by no-to-illegals (Scrutinize our government and Secure the Blessing of Freedom and Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ponygirl

What Good Can a Handgun Do Against An Army?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-backroom/2312894/posts


33 posted on 02/28/2014 10:28:18 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (I will raise $2M for Sarah Palin's next run, what will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Not my first choice but better Jeb than Hillary.


34 posted on 02/28/2014 10:30:39 PM PST by Red White and Blue patriot (USA all the way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ponygirl
There is no doubt that obama is attempting to start a world war. He undoubtedly thinks he can survive a nuclear weapons exchange. Should he survive I can see him coming on the few communications wires left and announcing he will not be leaving office. Who would there be to stop him after having had a nuclear exchange between nations?
35 posted on 02/28/2014 10:32:00 PM PST by no-to-illegals (Scrutinize our government and Secure the Blessing of Freedom and Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Red White and Blue patriot
Gosh FRiend ... on that one all I can do is ask why on either? We do have choices I pray and not more failed experiments, don't we?
36 posted on 02/28/2014 10:34:21 PM PST by no-to-illegals (Scrutinize our government and Secure the Blessing of Freedom and Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Well it must be true, it was in the Washington Compost/Daily Worker.

Now when the New York Slimes reports the same we may as well put our money away, cancel the conventions and go straight to an election.

Is it TRUE that the RNC is going to funnel MORE money directly into Reids pockets by holding their convention in Las Vegas?

With Reids ‘pals’ (Union hotel workers etal) preparing the food etc will be an adventure in itself and ALL the rooms will probably by wired with videocams etc so the Libs will be able to pick up more dirt for future elections.


37 posted on 02/28/2014 10:35:54 PM PST by xrmusn (6/98 --When you have them by the short hairs, the minds and hearts soon follow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red White and Blue patriot
Not my first choice but better Jeb than Hillary

For crying out loud.

Do you seriously believe that Jeb would win?

38 posted on 02/28/2014 10:36:19 PM PST by onyx (Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Yes, he could. He is down my list, but I would support Jeb over any Dem any day and I’m confident most Americans will too.


39 posted on 02/28/2014 10:39:59 PM PST by Red White and Blue patriot (USA all the way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Red White and Blue patriot
Yes, he could. He is down my list, but I would support Jeb over any Dem any day and I’m confident most Americans will too.

You're kidding yourself.

We've already had two Bush presidents within a matter of mere years.

40 posted on 02/28/2014 10:43:14 PM PST by onyx (Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson