Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gay Marriage Will Destroy the GOP
Politico Magazine ^ | May 28, 2014 | David Lampo

Posted on 05/30/2014 1:41:37 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

If conservatives don’t embrace the inevitable, they'll become irrelevant.

Since last year, the progress toward marriage equality has been nothing less than stunning. Nearly a year ago, the Supreme Court granted full federal recognition of married same-sex couples in declaring the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) unconstitutional. In rapid succession since then, federal judges in 13 states have overturned their state’s respective bans on same sex unions. The latest was last week in Pennsylvania, when Judge John E. Jones III, a G. W. Bush appointee, overturned the ban, writing, “We are a better people than what these laws represent.” Because Republican Gov. Tom Corbett has declined to appeal the judge’s decision, Pennsylvania is now the 19th state to legalize same-sex marriage.

Federal judges have ruled against the bans as diverse as Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon Tennessee, Texas, Utah and Virginia. Gay marriage isn’t just for blue states anymore.

One of the most eloquent statements against the bans was issued earlier this month by Arkansas federal judge Chris Piazza, who argued that state’s ban violates the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. “Procreation is not a prerequisite in Arkansas for a marriage license,” he said. “Opposite-sex couples may choose not to have children or they may be infertile, and certainly we are beyond trying to protect the gene pool. A marriage license is a civil document and is not, nor can it be, based upon any particular faith. Same-sex couples are a morally disliked minority and the constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriages is driven by animus rather than a rational basis. This violates the U.S. Constitution.”

These cases, and the others that will likely follow, can lead to just one thing: another historic case about gay marriage before the Supreme Court, one that could establish a constitutional right to marriage equality, something few legal experts thought would happen so soon after last year’s DOMA case.

Public opinion on this issue is marching forward as well. According to a recent Washington Post/ABC News poll, 59 percent of Americans now support gay marriage. Only a third opposes it, nearly the reverse of the same poll 10 years ago. Forty percent of Republicans support it, and nearly 60 percent of Republicans between the ages of 18 and 29. Even 51 percent of white evangelicals under 35 support it, according to the Public Religion Research Institute.

And yet the Christian Right, or at least most of its self-proclaimed leaders, just won’t let it go. In mid-May, a group of them called the Conservative Action Project met outside Washington, D.C., to plot their next moves and devise their agenda to push back against the Republican leadership in Congress, whom they see as too soft on Obama and his agenda. Mainstream business groups like the Chamber of Commerce, which is keen to see a GOP takeover of the Senate after missed opportunities in 2010 and 2012, are siding with the leadership.

Although some of the attendees do not share the Conservative Action Project’s anti-gay agenda, most of them do. At the mid-May meeting, they reaffirmed their explicit opposition to same-sex marriage along with opposition to abortion and illegal immigration reform. Tony Perkins, head of the anti-gay Family Research Council, led a panel about restoring the “traditional family” as a Republican Party priority, as if almost universal opposition to gay rights has not been the party’s priority for several decades.

Polling consistently shows that independents, younger voters and women—all of whom used to routinely vote Republican in presidential contests—are now more often than not reliable Democrat voters. They are also pro-gay rights and same-sex marriage, especially younger voters. Unless Republicans begin to win some of them back with policies of social tolerance, they will simply no longer be in contention in presidential elections. Slavish devotion to right-wing social policies is the road to oblivion on the national stage.

So it’s time to stop letting the anti-gay tail wag the Republican dog. The Christian Right spokesmen’s pious pleas for tolerance for their anti-gay religious convictions will fall on deaf ears (and should) as long as they continue their own intolerance for those who practice different faiths or have different sexual orientations than they do.

Ending their tight grip on the party’s social agenda, and its 2016 platform, must be the top priority of those who wish to bring the Republican Party into the 21st century and make it appeal to more than just old white men.


TOPICS: Issues; Parties
KEYWORDS: dnctalkingpoints; gaymarriage; homosexualagenda; homosexualmarriage; samesexmarriage

David Lampo is the author of A Fundamental Freedom: Why Republicans, Conservatives, and Libertarians Should Support Gay Rights, and he serves on the national board of Log Cabin Republicans.

1 posted on 05/30/2014 1:41:37 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Demented queers, funny how they don't see the backlash that's coming, precisely because of the judicial tyranny that has unleashed this relentless faggotry on normal people.

What has been done can be undone.

2 posted on 05/30/2014 1:49:42 AM PDT by Rome2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

A few years from now, lampo will be making the same arguments in favor of pedophilia and bestiality.

Once marriage is no longer restricted to one man and one woman, there can be no legal limitations on it at all that will not be found unconstitutional.

Thus, the institution will be destroyed and with it our society.

That 2% of the population has succeeded in foisting this on the other 98% is nothing short of astounding.


3 posted on 05/30/2014 1:58:49 AM PDT by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Because of this crap America will soon be irrelevant in the eyes of God.


4 posted on 05/30/2014 2:00:48 AM PDT by VerySadAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The US has leaped into despotism and we are supposed to be concerned what an issue does or doesn't do to a political party.

Consider that a handful of judges have imposed fag marriage on what are supposed to be fifty free, self-governing republics.

God punishes national sins with national calamities.

5 posted on 05/30/2014 2:06:17 AM PDT by Jacquerie (To restore the 10th Amendment, repeal the 17th. Article V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exit82

I think that’s the point the tyrannists keep missing. The bulk of the population are against being dictated to and, at some point if sufficiently motivated, can push back a lot harder and eliminate the enemy in one fell swoop.


6 posted on 05/30/2014 2:09:44 AM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

History shows legalized gay marriage and the acceptance of homosexuality in society in general will destroy our nation. First comes moral collapse then comes the judgment of that nation.


7 posted on 05/30/2014 2:10:23 AM PDT by cva66snipe ((Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
and certainly we are beyond trying to protect the gene pool. A marriage license is a civil document and is not, nor can it be, based upon any particular faith. Same-sex couples are a morally disliked minority and the constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriages is driven by animus rather than a rational basis. This violates the U.S. Constitution.
Heh. Just wow. Did this cretin overturn laws against intrafamily marriage? "we are beyond trying to protect the gene pool."

And being opposed is based on aniumus, so being opposed is unconstitutional. To borrow the author's characterization, "How eloquent."

8 posted on 05/30/2014 2:13:09 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The arguments like procreation isn’t a prerequisite is about as assinine as you can get, since the whole premise of marriage was designed to join people together to form strong families and GROW communities!!

The same argument can be made AGAINST homosexual-marriage: love is not a prerequisite for marriage otherwise we wouldn’t allow for easy annulments and quick easier divorces!

The crazy, far reaching arguments will open the door for people to marry their parents and siblings - since procreation isn’t a component anymore!!

The Pandora’s box with which these idiots are toying is going to destroy not only the moral fabric of America but also the financial future as well!! You think American money is tied up in the elites today, wait until families can hide and shift their fortunes from generation to generation a-la Royal families!


9 posted on 05/30/2014 2:16:16 AM PDT by ExTxMarine (PRAYER: It's the only HOPE for real CHANGE in America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The progs are fond of asking, “What would Jesus do?”. Do they really believe that Jesus would be “pro-choice”, and approve of “gay” “marriage”?


10 posted on 05/30/2014 2:29:15 AM PDT by windsorknot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
If conservatives don’t embrace the inevitable
Marxists have been saying that for how many years now? About 166 years. Only tyrants demand that people “embrace the inevitable” which is not.
11 posted on 05/30/2014 2:29:29 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: windsorknot

What Jesus would do is written down for all to see. But they insist on denying that.


12 posted on 05/30/2014 2:30:03 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

>> the inevitable

So now it’s taxes, sodomy, and death...


13 posted on 05/30/2014 2:31:59 AM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExTxMarine
"The Pandora’s box with which these idiots are toying is going to destroy not only the moral fabric of America but also the financial future as well!! You think American money is tied up in the elites today, wait until families can hide and shift their fortunes from generation to generation a-la Royal families!"

They will try to eliminate inter-generational inheritance altogether so that upon death, the state absorbs all assets.

14 posted on 05/30/2014 2:32:55 AM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

“Abolition of all rights of inheritance” is the third plank of the Ten Planks of Communism as outlined in the Manifesto.


15 posted on 05/30/2014 2:39:51 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Gay marriage will destroy the United States.


16 posted on 05/30/2014 2:51:40 AM PDT by Westbrook (Children do not divide your love, they multiply it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The same legal mumbo jumbo that gives an intolerant group rights will eventually be turned against that intolerant group as well. While the Gay community today sees only victory in the courts, there will come a day when Islam has to dealt with and the outcome will not be pretty for the openly Gay community.

Government Marriage is not the same by definition as Biblical Marriage. Therefore, there should be a differentiation of spelling to convey which marriage is in effect. Both may have the same rights for Government benefits, but one is sanctioned by God's Word and the other by Government which either replaces God or copies another Law of Old for the socialist masses.

19 posted on 05/30/2014 3:17:14 AM PDT by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
Maybe it is designed to make AIDS go mainstream and ensure all American's are enjoined to the misery of the Gay community. AIDS is mostly confined to and transmitted within the Gay and/or Bi-sexual community. Check the CDC website to verify.

The ObamaNationist's made legal travel of known AIDS carriers outside the US legal for military personnel and diplomats as a first order of business - breaking our treaties to limit AIDS.

20 posted on 05/30/2014 3:22:14 AM PDT by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

oh please its not just about gay marriage. The gay mafia revealled their intolerance to the 1st amendment with their opposition to Chick fil a and Phil Robertson.
After gay marriage they’ll go after Christians then Christian churches until all are in group think.


21 posted on 05/30/2014 3:22:42 AM PDT by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe

If you drop “legalized gay marriage and” your statement is true. What remains of western culture is going deeper into the abyss beyond where any previous culture has gone.


22 posted on 05/30/2014 3:24:13 AM PDT by Hieronymus ( (It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged. --G.K. Chesterton))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jumper

You have 2 pairs of people, and they are both claiming to tie the knot.

a. The first is a male and a female about 28 years old.

b. The second is a male and a male about 28 years old.

As you look at couples a & b, do you see any differences, to you anticipate any differences, and do any of the differences suggest that the two pairings are absolutely different in their nature?


23 posted on 05/30/2014 3:24:47 AM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: exit82
Thus, the institution will be destroyed and with it our society

The institution was destroyed in the period 1969-1973, when the following three changes were made:

1) It became terminable at will by one party with no recourse to the counterparty.

2) Its principal legal feature - sexual exclusivity - was no longer enforced by the law.

3) Bastardy was made the legal equivalent of legitimacy, as regards the obligation of fathers.

This made "traditional marriage" illegal in all 50 states, and instituted "gay marriage for heterosexuals".

That gays want in in what has become a nonbinding contract whose only legal significance is the receiving of certain government benefits is understandable.

24 posted on 05/30/2014 3:44:43 AM PDT by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000

I’d love to see a backlash on all the leftist travesties. But I don’t. Where is it. I’m ready to join.


25 posted on 05/30/2014 3:49:42 AM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“And yet the Christian Right, or at least most of its self-proclaimed leaders, just won’t let it go”

How dare they. And who would have thought it. You know, when Christians overseas have elected to die rather than renounce their faith. Who would expect these people to be so resistant.

The only way this destroys the GOP is if they listen to this creepy looking agenda pimp.


26 posted on 05/30/2014 4:56:48 AM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
If conservatives don’t embrace the inevitable, they'll become irrelevant.

I do not want to be relevant. I want to be right where God is. God is not where sin is, including and especially my own.

27 posted on 05/30/2014 5:04:12 AM PDT by chajin ("There is no other name under heaven given among people by which we must be saved." Acts 4:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The GOP isn’t the only thing it is destroying. More importantly, it’s destroying America.


28 posted on 05/30/2014 5:09:52 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Obama's smidgens are coming home to roost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

A handful of judges are engaged in a coup d’état.

When gay marriage is dictated throughout the United States, we will no longer be a free people.

We will then become the subjects of a judicial dictatorship.

And Jefferson warned us of this outcome in 1820.


29 posted on 05/30/2014 5:31:56 AM PDT by Oak Grove (H)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I want to say upfront that this is not an endorsement of gay marriage, just something I noticed a few weeks back.

Patty Murray, who is about as dumb as a pile of rocks but who is also by virtue of seniority the Chair of the Senate Budget Committee, put up a proposal to rein in the marriage penalty.

The reason is that the a big wave of newly married gays are either experiencing or about to experience the marriage penalty, and the Dems are trying to get ahead of being held to account for it ...


30 posted on 05/30/2014 5:41:16 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Let’s see, 5000 years of human civilization versus 10 years of public delusion. My bet’s on biological reality. Ask the ancient Greeks and Romans how it all worked out for them.


31 posted on 05/30/2014 5:52:06 AM PDT by MikeyB806
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jumper

Marriage vs. Mar-age?


32 posted on 05/30/2014 5:56:28 AM PDT by gnickgnack2 (QUESTION obama's AUTHORITY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000

Notice how these so-called polls always show a majority in favor of same-sex marriage(I refuse to use the term “gay marriage” because it isn’t) but every time the issue has ever appeared on a ballot the sodomites have lost? The polls are worthless.


33 posted on 05/30/2014 5:59:52 AM PDT by Russ (Repeal the 17th amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

One trick pony...

June 13, 2012

David Lampo, a longtime activist with the Virginia chapter of Log Cabin Republicans (LCR) and publications director at the libertarian Cato Institute, is author of a new book, A Fundamental Freedom: Why Republicans, Conservatives, and Libertarians Should Support Gay Rights, scheduled to be released on June 16 by Rowman & Littlefield.

Lampo spoke to the Charlottesville Libertarian Examiner about the book at the 2012 Capital Pride festival on Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington, where he was promoting the book at the LCR information table.

http://www.examiner.com/article/author-david-lampo-brings-gay-rights-message-to-conservative-republicans

He describes his book, A Fundamental Freedom, as “a primer about gay rights for Republicans [and] all right-of-center voters.”

GOP’s ‘bad reputation’

The Republican party, he explained, “has a bad reputation regarding gay rights and I thought it was time that somebody try to explain the concept and the philosophy behind [gay issues] from someone who shares their basic, fundamental political values.”

He felt it was important that “rather than liberals or leftists preaching at them about gay rights from the Left, I thought that somebody on the Right, specifically [someone] with a libertarian perspective, should address the issue with them.”


34 posted on 05/30/2014 6:00:43 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

David Lampo (@DavidLampo) tweeted at 7:33am - 30 May 14:

Phil Robertson’s advice for the GOP politico.com/story/2014/05/… via @politico Exactly what’s wrong with the Republicans: inviting this idiot. (https://twitter.com/DavidLampo/status/472355036727496705)

https://mobile.twitter.com/DavidLampo


35 posted on 05/30/2014 6:02:52 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

David Lampo (@DavidLampo) tweeted at 3:41pm - 20 May 14:

Judge Strikes Down Pennsylvania Ban on Gay Marriage nyti.ms/1h5pmCU The Big Mo gets bigger, can’t be stopped. (https://twitter.com/DavidLampo/status/468854121248739328)


36 posted on 05/30/2014 6:05:31 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

David Lampo (@DavidLampo) tweeted at 9:09am - 8 May 14:

The Big Reason Republicans Should Hope Jeb Bush Runs nyti.ms/1jjuDLF Cohn is right. Rs must welcome immigrants or die. (https://twitter.com/DavidLampo/status/464406659972857856)


37 posted on 05/30/2014 6:06:17 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

Then don’t have assets when you check out.


38 posted on 05/30/2014 6:07:15 AM PDT by Ted Grant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

David Lampo (@DavidLampo) tweeted at 8:43am - 31 Mar 14:

Republicans Are Driving the Momentum for Gay Marriage - Molly Ball - The Atlantic theatlantic.com/politics/archi… Our work is paying off. (https://twitter.com/DavidLampo/status/450629366171463680)


39 posted on 05/30/2014 6:09:32 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

David holds a Bachelor’s degree in Political Science from Penn State University and currently resides in Alexandria, Virginia. He is cofounder of the organization Virginia Republicans Moving Forward (VRMF), which aims to promote social tolerance within the Republican Party of Virginia.


40 posted on 05/30/2014 6:15:03 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Well, If the Rs become Ds (more than they already are) on this issue, what use are they? Maybe they’ll win back some pro-gay votes, but they will lose a lot of others.

Maybe Christian conservatives will be totally disenfranchised, as far as having a party to vote for, or maybe there will be a successful third-party movement.

Whichever, I’d rather be right than be Preident, as somebody once said.


41 posted on 05/30/2014 7:15:19 AM PDT by chesley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

There was not a single atom of original thought in this smug, condescending, self-righteous spew. A pig slop bucket would be less disgusting. F for Failure.


42 posted on 05/30/2014 8:13:09 AM PDT by darkangel82
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

So tell me again, what’s the difference between Log Cabin “Republicans” and Democrats, notably the ones who boo God at their convention? David Lampo obeisantly hoists the rainbow flag, shakes his tiny fist in God’s face and thinks he’s big stuff. And Democrats who’d like the Caligula Wing of the GOP to turn the Party into a pallid echo of themselves cheer.


43 posted on 05/30/2014 8:34:58 AM PDT by rhema ("Break the conventions; keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jumper

How would Muslims and gay churches spell marriage?


44 posted on 05/30/2014 9:04:08 AM PDT by ansel12 ((Ted Cruz and Mike Lee-both of whom sit on the Senate Judiciary Comm as Ginsberg's importance fades)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Yeah, “become a godless Democrat or you have no future.”

Go pound sand, or your nearest bath house, faggot!


45 posted on 05/30/2014 9:28:53 AM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Westbrook

“Gay marriage will destroy the United States.”

No doubt about that as it is only a matter of time and Democrats and liberal Republicans are hastening the ultimate Destruction.

Our only option is to work harder, demand unequivocal condemnation of gay marriage by all GOP candidates and judicial appointments.

Fight gay marriage in the courts up until the point of impeaching any judge that decides in favor of gay marriage.

Stand up for States’ Rights in every state where a Federal Judge has imposed gay marriage and demand national unity and impose national standards upon those states where the legislatures or voters have forced gay marriage on the people.


46 posted on 05/30/2014 10:07:00 AM PDT by Oliviaforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Oliviaforever

Problem is, about half of the population now thinks that the sick and perverse practices of homosexuals should not only be normalized and recognized by civil authorities as legitimate basis for marriage, but must be “celebrated” by the rest of the population, even to the point of excluding from professional positions those who disagree with the caprophage, urolagnia, fudge-packing, carpet-munching agenda.

The sodomites were able to do this because they have unlimited access to media, entertainment, academia, corporate board rooms, and the culture at large. Now, because of the endless indoctrination over the last 30 years through these cultural institutions, they clearly have the upper hand.

With about half the people on their side nationwide, and that number growing daily, they are now able to bring to bear the institution of government. Soon, there won’t be even one state in the Union that has not succumbed to the agenda of Sodom.

Meanwhile, we have been marginalized and have very limited access to any of these institutions.

And with Big Government coming down on us now, it is no longer just a cultural matter but a legal one if you disagree with the agenda of Sodom.

We will have to start where the Sodomites started, at the bottom of the heap, because that’s where we have been relegated by the rest of our cultural and governmental institutions.


47 posted on 05/30/2014 10:56:43 AM PDT by Westbrook (Children do not divide your love, they multiply it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Nature, no difference in pair B. Pair A by natural biological qualification, will produce offspring. Pair B will cause, by nature, unintended tearing of the anal cavity with each encounter, rendering Pair A the only one’s able to properly excrete at age 60.


48 posted on 05/30/2014 11:02:53 AM PDT by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson