Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

“Several” Republican senators reportedly uneasy with GOP’s tactics in Mississippi runoff
Hot Air ^ | June 27, 2014 | Allahpundit

Posted on 06/27/2014 5:11:48 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: Yardstick

Actually we should give the GOP Establishment a 50-50 senate just to make a point. Mississippi voters should either leave Cochran’s name blank on their ballots, or they should vote for the Democrat.

The DC GOP senate is so darn liberal they’ll probably vote for all of Obama’s Supreme Court Nominees anyway. You can look at the nominees they’ve already voted for and see I’m 100% right!


61 posted on 06/27/2014 7:21:06 PM PDT by o2bfree (Note to GOP Establishment Liberals: No more continuing budget resolutions!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
Support his pro life, pro gun, anti Obamacare opponent in the General election.

Who will no doubt 'evolve' within six months after being elected, to assent to every pro-abortion, anti-gun, pro-Obamacare vote for the next six years, and perhaps beyond. I will not touch an establishment candidate with a ten-foot pole, but I will not touch a Democrat candidate with a twenty-foot pole.

62 posted on 06/27/2014 7:36:39 PM PDT by chajin ("There is no other name under heaven given among people by which we must be saved." Acts 4:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

Sorry, I have more faith in the conservatives in MS. As “conservative” as the state is (relative to others), it’s not 100% conservative, even among Republicans. I think the state’s conservatives knew full well who they were voting for. There just may not be quite so many conservatives as posters here are assuming.


63 posted on 06/27/2014 7:41:00 PM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: chajin; xzins; wmfights
Who will no doubt 'evolve' within six months after being elected, to assent to every pro-abortion, anti-gun, pro-Obamacare vote for the next six years

He has been in congress and during his tenure in congress he earned the pro-life awards and the NRA rating AND he bucked Nancy Pelosi and voted against Obamacare.

I want Thad Cochran to lose by 30 points and I could sleep peacefully at night knowing that I supported his pro-life, pro-gun, anti-Obamacare opponent.

Childers' voting record is no doubt more conservative than many of the North Eastern Liberal Republican Senators as well as a couple of Arizona Senators.

64 posted on 06/27/2014 7:48:30 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Could someone explain how this (Democrats voting in a Republican primary - not the rest of the dirty tricks) is any different from 2008 when Rush Limbaugh suggested that Republicans cross over and vote for Democrats in primaries to keep the Democrat’s primary season running longer?

I thought it was a terrible idea then, and it is a terrible idea now, but don’t see how it is different.


65 posted on 06/27/2014 7:52:56 PM PDT by mountainbunny (Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens ~ J.R.R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe; chajin; xzins; wmfights

It was Childers who brought the legislation/lawsuit against Washington DC when they restricted gun rights. It wasn’t Cochran. It wasn’t even John McCain, Lindsay Graham, Susan Collins, Scott Brown, Lamar Alexander, John Cornyn, etc., etc., though they were in a far better position to be able to do so.

Childers is MORE conservative that anyone I just listed....all republicans.


66 posted on 06/27/2014 7:57:28 PM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: mountainbunny

Both parties had primary votes on June 3. The dems selected their candidate with a decided majority of the votes.

The republicans did not, thus the run-off. Having voted in the democratic primary on june 3, the dems who voted already selected their guy. Thus, they were INeligible to vote in the June 24 Republican primary runoff.

Any who voted in the dem primary on june 3 and subsequently voted in the republican primary on june 24 broke the law.


67 posted on 06/27/2014 7:57:36 PM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

Comment #68 Removed by Moderator

To: Black Agnes; xzins
Any who voted in the dem primary on june 3 and subsequently voted in the republican primary on june 24 broke the law.

And anyone who encouraged anyone to do that also broke the law. In fact if there was a conspiracy to solicit illegal votes, that would be a felony.

69 posted on 06/27/2014 8:03:37 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: MtnClimber

I’ve been telling them for years that I support Conservative candidates and not the Charlie Crists and the Scuzzafavas of the Republican Party. Then, Do it! Send those checks to the Conservative candidates!!

Now, I’ll say, call Haley Barbour for a donation! They haven’t got a dime of my money in a long time and THE GOPe NEVER WILL!


70 posted on 06/27/2014 8:03:38 PM PDT by jch10 (The Democrat mascot shouldnÂ’t be the donkey; it should be the tick.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: RedMDer

I would deduce that it’s every single Republican senator whose mouth has been sealed shut on the subject. That means ALL of them.

Some were duped on the tactics, maybe all of them were shocked, but they bought it this time, in more ways than one.

No more senate campaign coercion. No different from forced union dues, Red.


71 posted on 06/27/2014 8:08:26 PM PDT by RitaOK ( VIVA CHRISTO REY / Public education is the farm team for more Marxists coming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

They deserve to lose, but think of the consequences. Unless we get the Senate, Reid will stay in and I doubt that our country will even make it intact to 2016.

I think there should be a major stink, accompanied by legal challenges, because this went way beyond the usual Republican on Republican viciousness. GOP candidates never attack the Dem - they’re sweet as pie to the Dem, even those candidates who are theoretically “conservative” - but they always go after each other with no holds barred.

That’s got to stop, but we’ve got to get a numerical majority in the Senate and keep the House. It’s all a numbers game.


72 posted on 06/27/2014 8:15:01 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; All
Anyone wonder why THIS race was so important to win that the big wigs would cheat so blatantly and involve democrats. Putting out fliers and robo calls that they knew would be reported. That's taking a big risk. I know politics is dirty business, but it has to be more than just beating a a tea party candidate. Cochran was suppose to retire , but didn't AFTER he hear McDaniel's would run. Maybe they wanted to use an old man who would retire after voting for? Did they need him for some legislation they couldn't put though until after the election, because if they did it before the election voters would be mad and they would lose in November? Immigration?
73 posted on 06/27/2014 8:23:36 PM PDT by Linda Frances (Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Black Agnes

I saw where McDonald quoted a law that said a voter has to intend to support the person in the general that they supported in the primary. Unfortunately, that law is not valid - it was previously invalidated.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/chris-mcdaniel-democratic-votes-for-thad-cochran-were-illegal/

I have also heard what you mention (that those who voted previously in a primary are not able to vote again).

The question I asked is rather different - why is it okay for one party to meddle in the business of another, but not the other way around?

I thought it was dirty pool in 2008 when Rush suggested it, and think it is dirty pool now, but at the time, many supported Rush.


74 posted on 06/27/2014 8:40:43 PM PDT by mountainbunny (Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens ~ J.R.R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: RitaOK

Carl (the communist) Rove is going nt need a personal protection detail. Even that won’t prevent him being sent a premature ticket to hell.


75 posted on 06/27/2014 8:41:09 PM PDT by MtnClimber (Just doing laps around the sun and shaking my head that progressives can believe what they do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: livius
They deserve to lose, but think of the consequences. Unless we get the Senate, Reid will stay in and I doubt that our country will even make it intact to 2016.

So you'd rather have your daughter raped by an acquaintance than someone you don't know. Gotcha!

76 posted on 06/27/2014 8:41:56 PM PDT by Rides_A_Red_Horse (Why do you need a fire extinguisher when you can call the fire department?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Rides_A_Red_Horse; livius

More and more these cretins have show themselves to not be “we”


77 posted on 06/27/2014 8:44:11 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: mountainbunny
I saw where McDonald quoted a law that said a voter has to intend to support the person in the general that they supported in the primary.

That would be a very stupid law.

78 posted on 06/27/2014 8:45:51 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: mountainbunny
The question I asked is rather different - why is it okay for one party to meddle in the business of another, but not the other way around?

I thought it was dirty pool in 2008 when Rush suggested it, and think it is dirty pool now, but at the time, many supported Rush.

It's perfectly legit for one party to mess with another's primary. If one can gain an advantage, and it's allowed, why not?

The problem in this particular case, though, isn't with the Democrats. It's with Republicans smearing fellow Republicans with racist accusations...and seeking Democrat help to pervert a Republican primary.

Big difference.

79 posted on 06/27/2014 8:49:26 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: Ignorance on parade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: jocon307

Same here. What difference DOES it make? We still have nothing but commie basted jerks who would benefit. Chris, Ted, Sara and other like minded leaders need to form a group and let loose the Kracken! Surely the Conservatives across the land would make the best of the opportunity to at last have one of their own to fill the office. No more party unity of support. There is NO party. Just a group of power hungry drunks.


80 posted on 06/27/2014 8:57:39 PM PDT by V K Lee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson