[Diogenesis]

Yet another EXEMPT Judas 'Prince':
"Do not worry. We have your back, our beloved King."

[lee martell]

In short; Stay Tuned, but don’t hold your breath while doing so.

[gingerbread]

This idea of with holding fund from the president will cause severe dislocation of this country is a bogus argument. When the congress with held funds from Nixon during the Viet Nam War, this country didn’t all of a sudden collapse. All congress has to do is with hold the funds from OBAMA every time he makes a “PRESIDENTIAL DECREE”. Which alphabet government agency will he use to enforce his decree? With hold funds from that agency. They can also decide where the money should be spent, and where it cannot be spent. That would be more meaning full than taking this administration to court. By the time it goes through the courts, his term will be over.

[Bryan24]

They will lose. Congress had the process defined for them in the constitution. Impeachment.

[sirchtruth]

What makes me sick is the GOP understand the game, but either have no clue how to play it or no will to win.

Conservatives have to get away from these losers!

[Amendment10]

Thank you for referencing that article 2ndDivisionVet. Please bear in mind that the following critique is directed at the article and not at you.

"... and as violations of the constitutionally prescribed separation of powers."

Beware! There are actually two sides to the separation of powers coin. While constitutionally ignorant voters are always being reminded about the separation of powers of the legislative, executive and judicial branches of the unconstitutionally big federal government, the second side of the separate powers coin, state powers, is rarely acknowledged imo.

More specifically, voters are essentially left in the dark about the Constitution's division of federal and state government powers. State powers evidenced by Congress's constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers, the unique power of the states to ratify proposed amendments to the Constitution as evidenced by Article V, and the 10th Amendment's clarification that the Constitution's silence about a given issue automatically makes the issue uniquely an intrastate issue.

In fact, because of Congress's Section 8-limited powers, the states, not the corrupt feds, actually have the lion's share government power to serve the people. In other words, citizens should be working with their state, not federal lawmakers, to find legislative remedies to their problems.

As a side note concerning the federal government's constitutionally limited powers, consider that the states would really be a dull, boring place to grow up and live in if parents were to make sure that their children were taught about the federal government's constitutionally limited powers. /sarc

[T Ruth]

“It is incredible brazenness,” Rivkin adds. “And he continues in part because he’s gotten away with it.”

This is exactly what people said about Hitler in the 1930's.

[elpadre]

I don’t know if this has a chance or not, but in the chance it is, I would hope everyone on FR would get behind the House and give them our strongest support. Don’t dismiss it or put the plaintiff’s down, but get behind them and push.

[Steven Tyler]

1) Ant guesses on the strongest infraction??
2) What are the Cons in losing the case??

[JoeFromSidney]

It doesn't matter whether a transgression is "benevolent" or not. I can't get away with robbing a bank by giving the money to the Red Cross.

Any transgression is a violation of the President's constitutional duty to enforce the laws as written, not as he wishes they were written.