Skip to comments.What Dems always forget about Hillary: Clinton has perfect résumé, but she's a terrible politician
Posted on 07/14/2014 9:10:27 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Hillary Clinton already wears the mantle of presumptive nominee for president. She's an accomplished lawyer, a member of Walmart's board of directors, a close adviser to her husband when he was president, a two-term senator from New York, and secretary of state. And yet, she is a horrible politician.
So far, she has been able to sew up lots of Democratic money and support, and build an organization without actually beginning her campaign. She hasn't even decided on running, but maintains the repose of someone awaiting her party's coronation. That is a wise strategy.
Consider that Clinton has run in three elections. Her two wins in New York are not all that impressive, really. Instead of facing the powerful and well-funded Rudy Giuliani in 2000, who withdrew for health reasons, she was up against Representative Rick Lazio. Lazio only entered the race five months before it ended. And in her re-election in 2006, the New York GOP let a Yonkers mayor, John Spencer, be the sacrificial lamb. It is questionable whether many of the 31 percent of voters who went for him even knew his name before entering the voting booth. The only memorable moment from either race was when she accused Lazio of bullying after he approached her on a debate stage.
And of course she lost the only electoral race where she faced a credible opponent. In the 2008 race for the Democratic nomination she blew a massive early lead. One of the only reasons she did not get completely pasted by Barack Obama was his horrible off-the-record flub about rural voters "clinging to their guns and religion." Clinton immediately invented a strategy later used by the Tea Party and Glenn Beck of trying to tar Obama as an alien and radical. In their April 16 debate in Pennsylvania, she tried to highlight Obama's "relationship with Reverend Farrakhan" and portray him as a supporter of Hamas. This strategy failed utterly.
Her bad instinct in that campaign, one that energized his base and the media against her, is emblematic of a deeper problem. Clinton's vanity and self-regard lead her to consistently portray herself, falsely, as uniquely embattled. She may even see herself this way. It has worked well for her exactly twice. The first was the Lazio bullying incident. And the second was when she teared up on the way to victory in New Hampshire.
But the rest of the time it just leads her to tell embarrassing tall tales about herself or her opponents. She claimed to have landed under "sniper fire" in Bosnia in 1996, ducking rounds between airplane and car, when in fact she was walking and chatting with comedian Sinbad. On her book tour she claimed to have been "dead broke" after leaving the White House, when she was living in a beautiful Chappaqua estate, and snapping up other nice pieces of real estate.
She uses this strategy whenever she feels political pressure. When her husband, the president, used a young White House intern for sexual gratification, Hillary blamed "a vast right-wing conspiracy" aimed at them. When she was pressed at hearings about the death of the U.S. ambassador to Libya, she huffed and showed signs of breaking down: "What difference, at this point, does it make?"
And her sense of entitlement can lead to mistakes of arrogance. During her first run for Senate, and while she was under criticism for taking some money from Muslim groups, her campaign "mistakenly" recorded a donation from the American Muslim Council as from the "American Museum Council," before returning the $1,000 check after it became a controversy.
The Clintons' story last year was that she has learned from her mistakes. And maybe, after her gaffe-strewn book launch, she'll learn from them again. If she manages to keep challengers away in the Democratic primary, she'll also receive some cover for mistakes merely from the command she'll have of partisan energies by the time she faces an opponent. That'll help.
Clinton may have been masterly at State. But she's proven unable to master the hustings. In a fair fight with a Republican, feigned or real weakness will not prove to be a strength. Look at Lyndon Johnson's pained reaction after Nixon's Manila questions. Or George H.W. Bush's exasperation at having two rivals. Or Romney's pained expression when Candy Crowley backed up President Obama during the debate. In presidential politics, theres no victory in being a victim.
Gag me!! “Clinton may have been masterly at State.”
Name ONE SINGLE accomplishment other than presiding over the complete destruction of the post WW II global geopolitical system.
That’s a feature, not a bug to the Left.
Really? I want some of what Michael Brendan Dougherty is smoking.
She is also certifiably insane. One more brain vessel pops and Hilldog will no longer be ‘house trained’ and will crap all over the debate stage. Maybe Warren should run.
She sucks at everything but lying.
But it’s Joey’s turn! He the Veep! He ain’t dumb - not like what people say about him!
Perhaps Kerry will decide to match and raise Hillary with a run of his own. After all, he did serve in Viet Nam, you know.
Great resume but terrible politician, eh?
Sure sounds like Robert Dole, doesn’t it?
She was a 'carpetbagger' of a senator who was not even a resident of New York when she ran and had to do some fast and shifty paper-shuffling to purchase a property to claim that she was eligible to run (never mind that she did not fulfill the Residency requirements), she got our fellow citizens killed when she was Secretary of State -which by the way was another position that was obviously only given to her as a political favor. The only obvious thing she seemed to care about in that job was all the free travel and perks (and booze) for her and her friends -all the several dozens of them that went along each time. Oh, but Benghazigate was really only due to "... a vile internet video which we had nothing to do with".
Yet somehow she feels she is qualified to become president of this country? Granted, the current occupant is a national disgrace and a proven fool, but she is no prize either.
Plus there are all her personal problems that she still carries to this day: Cattle Futures, the Rose Law Firm files, Travelgate, Fostergate, Monicagate, Hillarycare, publicly supporting a philandering farce of a husband, and "It's all a Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy!" ("That'll show those f***ers!", she was reported to have said after her interview).
This person has all the warmth, charm, and charisma of a scorpion on a cold desert night -but lacking all the social graces.
Oh, and she's broke, too. (/sarc)
The writer of this article is an obvious idiot.
Well, she did get loaded a good many times.
Was a member of Wamart's board of directors. A position she held in over 20 years ago.
She was a "great Secretary of State", though. Rick Perry said so.
She sucks at everything but lying.
Check out this smooth , shameless lie about Bosnia she tried to put over on us in a speech.
She is a superb and practiced liar when she has time to rehearse, but she is even worse than Obama in off the cuff, unscripted forums.
Another reason I don’t like Walmart.
Another reason I don’t like Perry.
I have no use for either but I did shop at Walmart back when the left was calling for a boycott.
Bill exudes warmth. It is a fake warmth (unless you are female and he is staring at your.... never mind) but he still feels like a good ol' boy. The kind of guy that you would have over for a couple of beers.
Hillary feels like the kind of person who would ask for a Gray Goose Martin and then complain that it was not mixed to her liking.
Yeah if you want a creep and a criminal with a history of getting away with it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.