Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nelson not sure how cold Johanns is to U.S. Senate bid
The Associated Press ^ | Tuesday, May 27, 2003 | Kevin O'Hanlon

Posted on 05/28/2003 6:58:41 AM PDT by JohnnyZ

LINCOLN -- The day after Republican Gov. Mike Johanns said he wasn't exactly keen on making a Senate bid in 2006, Democratic Sen. Ben Nelson wasn't biting.

"I still think he's running," Nelson said Tuesday in Lincoln. "He didn't say he wasn't."

Johanns said Monday that he wished a strong GOP candidate would step forward to challenge Nelson.

"The ideal situation for me would be if a Chuck Hagel-type person ... said 'I want to run for the United States Senate,' " Johanns said. "It would take a tremendous burden away from me."

"It seems likes he's pulled back," Nelson said. "But he hasn't pulled out."

Nelson, who hasn't said he will seek re-election, then sent a barb toward Johanns.

"He's spent more time talking about '06 than I have," Nelson said. "I'm focused on '03 -- I'd think he'd be focused on '03 as well."

Johanns made the comments at a news conference announcing his vetoes of a budget containing tax increases that was proposed by state lawmakers.

Johanns had proposed far deeper cuts and only an increase in the cigarette tax to balance the state's books.

Some observers have suggested that Johanns knew that lawmakers -- who are expected to override his vetoes -- would go for less severe cuts than he proposed.

That, in theory, would allow Johanns to run for the Senate and say that he did not raise taxes.

"I don't think what he did can be understood in any other way," said Democratic State Chairman Steve Achelpohl. "He completely abdicated his responsibility."

David Kramer, chairman of the state GOP, said he was not worried about finding a candidate.

"We're still two years away from being one year away from the primary," Kramer said. "We've got plenty of time to worry about that."

He was not ready to rule out Johanns, however.

"I think his focus is on being governor," Kramer said.

Nelson, the only Democrat in Nebraska's congressional contingent, served two terms as governor just before Johanns was elected.

Johanns easily won a second term last November, but cannot run for governor again because of term limits.

Some political observers have said Johanns would be the logical candidate to challenge Nelson.

Johanns said the Senate race was the furthest thing from his mind, and his family would weigh heavily in his deciding whether to continue in politics.

Any of the state's constitutional officers or U.S. Representatives -- all Republicans -- or former Attorney General Don Stenberg would make strong Senate candidates, Johanns said.

Stenberg left office in January after not seeking a fourth term. He said it was too early to speculate on whether he might try another Senate bid.

Stenberg lost the GOP Senate nomination in 1996 to Hagel.

Stenberg won the Republican nomination for the Senate in 2000, but lost to Nelson in the general election by the closest margin since Nebraska began directly electing senators in 1916.


TOPICS: Nebraska; Campaign News; State and Local; U.S. Congress; U.S. Senate
KEYWORDS: bennelson; johanns
Ben Nelson can and should be taken out.

The prior article on this subject from the day before:

http://www.theindependent.com/stories/052703/new_johanns27.shtml

1 posted on 05/28/2003 6:58:42 AM PDT by JohnnyZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
Even if Johanns doesn't run we still have a very strong Bench in Nebraska. We've got all their Congressmen, and plenty of statewide officers.

But I still prefer Johans because he has the *Star power* and *Name Recognition* to wage war against Nelson.
2 posted on 05/28/2003 5:23:37 PM PDT by Pubbie (Bill Owens for Prez and Jeb as VP in '08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ; Pubbie; Theodore R.; Nathaniel Fischer; AuH2ORepublican; LdSentinal; Kuksool; Coop; ...
Sen. Nelson reminds me a bit of the late former Senator Ed Zorinsky, a Conservative Jewish Dem (and rather finicky pol) from NE. Zorinsky had been a GOP Mayor of Omaha and the 'Rats managed to lure him into the Senate contest in 1976 when the venerable Conservative GOPer Roman Hruska retired (Hruska retired because of worries at 72 he was "too old" to run again). Zorinsky never got below a 60-70% Conservative rating (ACU), and occasionally got into the 80% range. Zorinsky was getting rather tired of the leftist slant of the party and was expected to return to the GOP by the end of the '80s when he died of a heart attack at the age of 58 in 1987. Alas, the GOP Governor of the state appointed a very weak GOPer named Dave Karnes to the seat, who in turn lost to Bob Kerrey, a very piss-poor successor to Zorinsky. The irony about the "old man" that Zorinsky replaced in the Senate, ex-Sen. Hruska remained active until his death at the age of 95 in 1999 (and could've easily won 4 more Senate contests !). Nelson was courted by the GOP prior to the '00 contest to run against Kerrey, but opted to stick with the 'Rats. Personally, I hope he decides to follow up with the decision that Sen. Zorinsky didn't get a chance to follow through on and switch parties.
3 posted on 05/28/2003 7:58:36 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~Remember, it's not sporting to fire at RINO until charging~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
"Personally, I hope he decides to follow up with the decision that Sen. Zorinsky didn't get a chance to follow through on and switch parties."

A "Surrender or be Destroyed" ultimatum with Nelson sounds good to me!

: D
4 posted on 05/28/2003 8:30:24 PM PDT by Pubbie (Bill Owens for Prez and Jeb as VP in '08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
Thanks for the ping.

Nelson was courted by the GOP prior to the '00 contest to run against Kerrey, but opted to stick with the 'Rats.

Indeed, however, with Kerrey bowing out and giving Nelson his blessing to take his seat, Nelson went to campaign as a Democrat. Still, we should have won this seat. ABS - Anybody But Stenberg. Chuck Hagel pasted Nelson in the 1996 senate contest and Nelson was then a sitting governor. Any other Republican candidate would have won, but Stenberg relied too much on Bush's coattails to effectively counter Nelson's arguments that Nebraska would be better off with each party having a senator from Nebraska.

As for potential Republican candidates to take Nelson, the GOP is fortunate to have Governor Mike Johanns (R) as a potential nominee. His apporoval ratings remain high even though governors in other states have dismal ratings.

The second best candidate (or perhaps the best) would be Congressman Tom Osborne (R) -- the most beloved person in the state. Nevertheless, Osborne has shown little interest in seeking higher office -- let alone another term in the House -- and is inexperienced at campaigning.

Congressman Bereuter (R) and Lee Terry (R) are other possiblities with my pick going to Terry and his second district (the least Republican in the state) support in a general election. And, of course, there are other possibilities at Secretary of State, Treasurer, and Lt. Governor.

Just no Stenberg, please

5 posted on 05/28/2003 9:05:28 PM PDT by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
(Hruska retired because of worries at 72 he was "too old" to run again).

Especially amusing given that even back then he was still a couple of years younger than Strom Thurmond. :-)

6 posted on 05/29/2003 5:33:56 AM PDT by Coop (God bless our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
I agree, if we can get Ben Nelson to switch, we should. He's conservative enough that he wouldn't be a RINO. I'd rather have Nelson switch and then have Johanns beat Hagel in the GOP primary in 2008. I think Nelson with an R next to his name would be better than the untrustworthy Hagel with an R next to his name.
7 posted on 05/29/2003 6:58:53 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican
better to get Nelson to switch and spend the GOP money/effort elsewhere.
8 posted on 05/29/2003 2:39:41 PM PDT by votelife (FREE MIGUEL ESTRADA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie; JohnnyZ; Theodore R.; Nathaniel Fischer; AuH2ORepublican; LdSentinal; Kuksool; Coop; ...
One reason why Nelson lost in '96 (despite sky-high popularity) was because Hagel played up fears about turning the Governorship over to ultraliberal Kim Robak, which helped turn the tide. Nelson was well-liked because he governed essentially like a moderate (pro-life) Republican. Stenberg should've won in '00, but Nelson was just too popular. The one candidate who could've beaten Nelson by at least 5% was Tom Osborne. Osborne's decision to run for a safe GOP House seat instead of the Senate made the difference between a 'Rat or GOP majority in the last session. Even if he decided to just serve a term, that would've preferable. If Johanns firmly decides not to do it, I think Lee Terry, Jr. would be a good candidate, but that puts a competitive seat at risk (no doubt the 'Rat Omaha Mayor Mike Fahey may be taking a look).
9 posted on 05/29/2003 7:15:30 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~Remember, it's not sporting to fire at RINO until charging~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
The second best candidate (or perhaps the best) would be Congressman Tom Osborne (R) -- the most beloved person in the state. Nevertheless, Osborne has shown little interest in seeking higher office -- let alone another term in the House -- and is inexperienced at campaigning.

Wouldn't he just about be a shoo-in? I was at the Bush event in Omaha. When Osborne came in, the place went nuts. He's extremely popular.

10 posted on 05/30/2003 10:28:08 AM PDT by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Conservativegreatgrandma
Yup. If Osborne wanted to run and campaigned effectively, he could take that seat away from Nelson (D).
11 posted on 05/30/2003 10:26:39 PM PDT by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: LdSentinal
I would think so.
12 posted on 05/31/2003 4:17:54 AM PDT by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
GOP Club
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson