Skip to comments.
Recall spurs new era of negotiation [Arnold to 'mend, not end' drivers licenses for illegals?]
Sac Bee ^
| 10-14-03
| Sac Bee
Posted on 10/14/2003 12:13:31 PM PDT by ambrose
Edited on 04/12/2004 6:00:31 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
On the morning after Arnold Schwarzenegger was elected governor, the lawmaker who pushed through a controversial state law to allow illegal immigrants to drive telephoned a legislator who opposed the measure.
"We need to start working together," Sen. Gil Cedillo, D-Los Angeles, told Assemblyman Robert Pacheco, R-Walnut.
(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: catrans; driverslicense; illegal; immigrants; sb60; schwarzenegger
1
posted on
10/14/2003 12:13:32 PM PDT
by
ambrose
To: ambrose
"If he wants to come up with a mandate to just reverse (it), I don't think that's the way you bring people together," said Assemblyman Fabián Nuñez, D-Los Angeles, a leading contender to become the next speaker.But passing SB60 brought people together on the issue? More dumb logic.
To: All
| Aww man! Enough of the fundraiser posts!!! |
 |
| Only YOU can make fundraiser posts go away. Please contribute! |
3
posted on
10/14/2003 12:19:55 PM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: ambrose
Folks when all these liberal newspapers mention Prop. 187, they never say it passed with 59% of the votes. They always talk like anyone being for the proposition is committing political suicide. The opposite is true. I believe the same election that Prop. 187 was on the ballot is the year Pete Wilson was reelected Governor. I know he was for Prop. 187 because he knew that illegals were strangling. CA. They still are, only it is far worse.
4
posted on
10/14/2003 12:25:10 PM PDT
by
Uncle Hal
To: ambrose
To the dims bipartisanship means the Republicans have to go along with their wants, partisanship means the dims don't get their way and act like two-year olds
5
posted on
10/14/2003 12:27:32 PM PDT
by
sticker
To: ambrose
"It may all be moot because, independent of this, opponents are gathering signatures to repeal this at the ballot (in March)," said Romero, who voted for the bill. "And if it gets on the ballot, they will win."Let's get those petitions signed!
To: ambrose
This whole article is a blatant attempt to blur the difference between legal immigrants and illegal aliens.
7
posted on
10/14/2003 12:50:50 PM PDT
by
45Auto
(Big holes are (almost) always better.)
To: ambrose
Why doesn't someone propose that the DL have a great big transparency across it reading "non-citizen license" ?
That way everyone knows that the license gives them the right to drive,but not citizenship.
8
posted on
10/14/2003 1:04:51 PM PDT
by
wildbill
To: wildbill
OUCH!
Stop it! You're hurting my head!
You're making too much sense :)
9
posted on
10/14/2003 1:13:42 PM PDT
by
taxed2death
(A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
To: All
10
posted on
10/14/2003 2:03:56 PM PDT
by
My2Cents
(Well...there you go again.)
To: ambrose
"It may all be moot because, independent of this, opponents are gathering signatures to repeal this at the ballot (in March)," said Romero, who voted for the bill. "And if it gets on the ballot, they will win." So, they admit they are acting against the people's wishes?
11
posted on
10/14/2003 2:10:21 PM PDT
by
GraniteStateConservative
("We happy because when we switch on the TV you never see Saddam Hussein. That's a big happy.")
To: Uncle Hal
And when all the newspapers mention giving drivers licenses to illegal aliens in California, they never mention that at least ten other states already do this. Why does everyone act like California is the first place to do this? And why was there no huge outcry over the other states issuing drivers licenses to people who are here illegallly? I don't get it.
12
posted on
10/14/2003 2:15:58 PM PDT
by
halfdome
To: ambrose
To: wildbill
That way everyone knows that the license gives them the right to drive in a southerly direction only.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson