Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Serried Ranks of Oafs (Excellent Democratic Candidate bashing editiorial)
NY Sun ^ | 10/16/03 | R. Emmett Tyrell Jr.

Posted on 10/16/2003 6:24:44 AM PDT by areafiftyone

Upon listening to the Democratic presidential candidates very attentively and even respectfully, I am wondering. At this point in the Democratic lunge for the presidential nomination, does Howard Dean have a monopoly on that sector of the Democratic vote that we may classify as the moron vote? Or is the idiotic Senator John Kerry chipping away at these serried ranks of oafs? And, just as an aside, are there still enough Democrats of the type who nominated Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman, Adlai Stevenson, John Kennedy, and Hubert Humphrey to give the nomination to Senator Lieberman, heir to the governing wing of the Democratic Party?

The other day on CNN, I heard the mentally disturbed Michael Moore dismiss Senator Lieberman as “a Republican.” Mr. Moore, naturally, admires Dr. Dean, the moderate from Vermont, who now insists that he is a Yippie, circa 1968. Mr. Moore is sufficiently mindless to believe that.

Senator Lieberman, on the other hand, has for many years been steady in his commitment to the collectivist domestic policies and vigilant foreign policy that New Dealers, Fair Dealers, and New Frontiersmen used to govern America for roughly three decades, setting the country on a course that defeated world communism and accomplished some rather good things domestically. To say that Senator Lieberman is a Republican is either stupid or a deception.

Deception plays very well with the Democrats’ moron vote, though it is perhaps more accurate to refer to that vote as the indignant moron vote, for it is very indignant and, in fact, proud of its anger. Anytime I write something discourteous about Dr. Dean, I receive a torrent of e-mails from the indignant moron vote. Usually the indignado begins by claiming never to have voted before but now to be attracted by the shirtsleeved medico’s illusory virtues. Now I wonder if Senator John Kerry has nibbled away at Dr. Dean’s vote. The Vietnam veteran — who supported the war in Iraq, but did not support the war; who boasts of his war record, but does not boast of his war record — is certainly an obvious enough fraud to appeal to the moron vote. Moreover, he is sufficiently angry to give the morons goose pimples.

That he is a splendid phony is abundantly clear. In fact, he may be the phoniest of all the Democrats now running. This week in The Hill, the indefatigable Sam Dealey, a reporter who has the wit to report not only what a politician says today but what the pol said yesterday, demonstrated what a fraud the Francophile senator from Massachusetts really is.

First, Mr. Dealey reports that Dr. Dean is chiding Senator Kerry for “flip-flopping on the importance of serving in Vietnam in presidential politics.” Then Mr. Dealey reports Senator Kerry’s many boasts about how important a credential his military service is. Then Mr. Dealey disinters statements by Senator Kerry in the 1990s denying the importance of a military credential. Senator Kerry was defending Bill Clinton, the draftdodger about to win the Democratic presidential nomination. In defense of Mr. Clinton, Senator Kerry said things such as this, a rhetorical question to Mr. Clinton’s opponent, President George H. W. Bush: “If service or non-service in the war is to become a test of qualification for high office, you would not have a vice president.” He is referring to the fact that Vice President Dan Quayle only served in the National Guard.

Senator Kerry, the veteran who stresses his military service, but does not stress his military service, also disparages service in the National Guard, though you can be sure he will soon insist that he does not disparage service in the National Guard, especially when a reporter notes the fine service that it’s now performing in Iraq.

That quotation directed against Mr. Quayle is ancient history, but then there is this quote from October 6. Asked about reinstating the draft, Senator Kerry gratuitously sneers, “There are some people in high office today who pulled strings to get into the National Guard.” That’s a canard that he and the moron vote fling at the president.

Viewing the charges that the Democrats fling at one another, and the charges they fling at the president, who, it seems to me, is almost certain to be reelected, I have come to a conclusion. These candidates have an instinctive aversion to the truth.

On matters large and small, they are with surprising regularity wrong. Apologists explain that they have to be wrong to appeal to their base, the moron vote. I hate to sound like a moralist, but I just do not think that’s a sufficient reason for lying, even about yourself.


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS: 2004; electionpresident; emmetttyrelljr; remmetttyrelljr

1 posted on 10/16/2003 6:24:45 AM PDT by areafiftyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
I watched a few minutes of the latest debate and I feel that the author here is ignoring one of the top morons of the group: Kucinich. It's a forgivable ommission, considering the fact that Kucinich's chance of getting the nomination (to say nothing of being elected President) is about on a par with Braun and Sharpton.

However, Kucinich does deserve Honorable Moron Mention because of his total persona. He's a Marxist Humuculus, babbling on about the evil corporations, pandering to every socialist whim on the planet, and all with the look and sound of that Mighty Midget of Mediocrity, Ross Perot.

Soldier on, Comrade Kucinich. You're sure to get at least as many votes in the primaries as Arianna Huffington did in the California Recall Election.
2 posted on 10/16/2003 6:42:35 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Comparing Dean and Kerry to JFK and FDR is a little like comparing the Medici Popes to Marcus Aurillious.
3 posted on 10/16/2003 6:45:21 AM PDT by .cnI redruM (Zot me and my screen name gets even dorkier!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
"Kumbaya Kucinich" will get most of the Green vote. He is about as important to this election as Ralph Nader. He is actually going to be a spoiler for the Democreeps when it comes to the Greens.
4 posted on 10/16/2003 6:45:31 AM PDT by areafiftyone (When the Democrats talk its like the hamster is dead but the wheel is still spinning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Apologists explain that they have to be wrong to appeal to their base,
the moron vote. I hate to sound like a moralist, but I just do not think
that’s a sufficient reason for lying, even about yourself.

The Moron Vote ™   LOL!   Excellent!

5 posted on 10/16/2003 6:46:33 AM PDT by jigsaw (Grab life by the taglines: TaglinusFR 26 --> http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/1000017/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
They have to lie because they all hate Bush.
6 posted on 10/16/2003 6:51:52 AM PDT by tractorman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
That's good news if you're right. I had no idea the Greens liked him. I thought Party Boss Dean was leftwing enough for them. But Komrad Kucinich, huh? That would be wonderful.
7 posted on 10/16/2003 6:52:01 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Senator Lieberman, on the other hand, has for many years been steady in his commitment to the collectivist domestic policies and vigilant foreign policy that New Dealers, Fair Dealers, and New Frontiersmen used to govern America for roughly three decades, setting the country on a course that defeated world communism and accomplished some rather good things domestically.

More historical revisionism.

8 posted on 10/16/2003 6:58:47 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM; biblewonk
Comparing Dean and Kerry to JFK and FDR is a little like comparing the Medici Popes to Marcus Aurillious.

Guess I'll have to take your word on that one. ;O)

9 posted on 10/16/2003 6:59:04 AM PDT by newgeezer (fundamentalist, regarding the Constitution AND the Holy Bible, i.e. WORDS MEAN THINGS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Some of the Greens are for Kucinich. Others are going with Dean.
10 posted on 10/16/2003 6:59:53 AM PDT by huck von finn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%
More historical revisionism

I think he's referring to Lieberman as an honorable Democrat, which I may have agreed with a few years ago. Historically, there were several. Tyrell is rightly pointing out that they are now few and far between, if not extinct.

11 posted on 10/16/2003 7:05:27 AM PDT by Mr. Bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Mr. Moore is sufficiently mindless

What a great start to my day!

LVM

12 posted on 10/16/2003 7:06:37 AM PDT by LasVegasMac (You tell 'em I'm coming! And you tell 'em Hell is coming with me!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
au contraire, mon ami, Dennis is the GOP's secret weapon this election..he's a true zealot..he's staying in all the way, and he's dragging the entire Dem party waaaaay to the far left....many here thougth that we should support Sharpton...but Dennis is far better bang for the buck...did you notice in the last debate that he attacked Dean from the left...it'll drive Dean crazy
13 posted on 10/16/2003 7:19:00 AM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Mr. Moore is sufficiently mindless...

I totally and heartily disagree with this assertion about Mr. Moore being totally mindless. He has to have at least a brain stem in order for his mouth to work to keep filling that rather large meat bag.

14 posted on 10/16/2003 7:25:59 AM PDT by ladtx ( "Remember your regiment and follow your officers." Captain Charles May, 2d Dragoons, 9 May 1846)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladtx
Give Moore credit. He has used his obnoxious personality to make bags of money. He knows exactly which buttons to push to extract money from morons.
15 posted on 10/16/2003 7:32:45 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
During the French Revolution the character with the most radical ideas, which came closest to those of later socialists, was Gracchus Babeuf.

Since Dennis is a Frenchified version of the name Dionysius, and Dionysus = Bacchus, and taking into account his appearance, maybe Dennis Kucinich should be known as Bacchus Baboon.

16 posted on 10/16/2003 7:46:52 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Bird
I think he's referring to Lieberman as an honorable Democrat, which I may have agreed with a few years ago. Historically, there were several. Tyrell is rightly pointing out that they are now few and far between, if not extinct.

Possibly. My point is that Democrats did not defeat Communism or improve our domestic situation.

17 posted on 10/16/2003 8:18:08 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
Dennis is the GOP's secret weapon this election..he's a true zealot..he's staying in all the way, and he's dragging the entire Dem party waaaaay to the far left....many here thougth that we should support Sharpton...but Dennis is far better bang for the buck...did you notice in the last debate that he attacked Dean from the left...it'll drive Dean crazy

I hope you're right. The fact that anyone would vote for that ferrit-faced half-wit completely boggles my imagination. But if you're right, then it's a good thing that he's in there.

As I said in a previous post: Soldier on, Komrad Kucinich.

18 posted on 10/17/2003 4:52:55 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
Oh, yeah..I'm right...Dennis is the unofficial "green:" party candidtae inside the Dem campaign...and mark my words...he's gonna drive Dean wacko..
19 posted on 10/17/2003 6:49:29 AM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
I guess you could say there's a danger here, though. Komrad K could pull enough wacko votes from Dean to let one of the more (perceived) moderate candidates slip through and get the nomination?
20 posted on 10/17/2003 6:52:53 AM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson