Skip to comments.
Militia member 'filled with rage,' plotted ambush
The Grand Rapids Press ^
| Friday, October 17, 2003
| Ed White
Posted on 10/17/2003 10:29:17 AM PDT by FourPeas
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 481-497 next last
To: MineralMan
Absolutely. I don't believe I have a constitutional right to own Anti-aircraft weapons.You realize that a .50 caliber is an anti-aircraft weapon?
To: Prodigal Son
Make the next question about the size of a .12-guage shotgun slug.
62
posted on
10/17/2003 11:18:05 AM PDT
by
Maelstrom
(To prevent misinterpretation or abuse of the Constitution:The Bill of Rights limits government power)
To: activationproducts
"How do you know which calibers, cartirdges, and actions you should have a right to. Where do you draw the line? How do you know where to draw the line?"
I don't. I have the firearms I've purchased, and the ones given to me by dead relatives. All are normal sporting firearms, with the exception of the Sharps carbine, which was military issue. All were purchased through commercial channels, except for the Sharps.
None fall into any category likely to be affected by any bans.
I'm not planning to go to war.
63
posted on
10/17/2003 11:18:23 AM PDT
by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
To: Chancellor Palpatine
Well, you certainly have your stereotypes all wrapped up in one handy package. You are letting your prejudices blind you to what you are advocating. By your statement, then, it is desireable to penalize all citizens because of the potential actions of a few miscreants.
You do realize that is one of the most-repeated and fundamental positions of the gun-grabbing left, do you not?
64
posted on
10/17/2003 11:20:17 AM PDT
by
Joe Brower
("If you need a lawyer to tell you what your rights are, you don't have any rights.")
To: Fierce Allegiance
"a ranch is what hollyweirdos buy. you live in a compound!"
No really it's "ranch". Yeah, that's it a ranch. Or maybe a "farm". But, no, not a "compund". Well, maybe a fort, but not a compound.
lol.
65
posted on
10/17/2003 11:20:27 AM PDT
by
Ribeye
(Meet the twins....Pete& Re-Pete. My consecutive number Vaquero's!)
To: FourPeas
Where do these guys get the money to buy this stuff? Hell, a single handgun will set you back a few hundred bucks.
66
posted on
10/17/2003 11:21:27 AM PDT
by
Junior
(Kinky is using a feather. Sick is using the whole chicken.)
To: MineralMan
Yes, they do fall under weapons to be banned.
You're guilty of everything this guy is guilty of, absent a bit of hearsay to bring the fuzz down on you. Paint you as a lunatic, owner of an arsenal, someone who uses guns, why, you probably even transport them to a targetting range...that could make your vehicle a "war wagon".
Your Sharps qualifies as "anti-aircraft" and the BATF is happy to tell you that it doesn't matter how well it works.
67
posted on
10/17/2003 11:21:33 AM PDT
by
Maelstrom
(To prevent misinterpretation or abuse of the Constitution:The Bill of Rights limits government power)
To: Chancellor Palpatine
It seems rather redundant to add the phrase, "filled with rage" to "militia member".
68
posted on
10/17/2003 11:22:20 AM PDT
by
wimpycat
(Down with Kooks and Kookery!)
To: Joe Brower
Chancellor Palpatine always has...
69
posted on
10/17/2003 11:22:27 AM PDT
by
Maelstrom
(To prevent misinterpretation or abuse of the Constitution:The Bill of Rights limits government power)
To: Junior
Perhaps he has a, uh, job?
70
posted on
10/17/2003 11:23:08 AM PDT
by
FourPeas
To: Junior
Where do these guys get the money to buy this stuff? Hell, a single handgun will set you back a few hundred bucks.Like anyone else any American who is not on the government dole, they work for a living.
71
posted on
10/17/2003 11:23:26 AM PDT
by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
To: MineralMan
It's a memory piece for me.You're lucky to have such a link to your family's past. ;^)
72
posted on
10/17/2003 11:23:58 AM PDT
by
headsonpikes
(Spirit of '76 bttt!)
To: FourPeas
Norman Somerville, 43, was arrested last week on federal gun and drug charges
Would be a fun experiment to change "Norman Somerville" to "Nuwasid Somiryya" and leave the rest of the story the same and see how the replies change.
73
posted on
10/17/2003 11:27:22 AM PDT
by
John H K
To: B Knotts
What exactly is a "compound?" What makes it a "compound?" It's a compound if the press wants to smear you...it's a 40 acre ranch if they don't.
74
posted on
10/17/2003 11:27:37 AM PDT
by
hattend
To: B Knotts
40 acres = a farm
40 acres + a gun = a compound
40 acres + a bible + a gun = a cult compound
40 acres + a copy of the federalist papers + a gun = a right-wing militia compound
75
posted on
10/17/2003 11:29:37 AM PDT
by
azcap
To: azcap
That about sums it up.
76
posted on
10/17/2003 11:31:35 AM PDT
by
hattend
To: azcap
40 acres + a copy of the federalist papers + a gun + the BATF + CNN = a fedgov photo op
77
posted on
10/17/2003 11:31:50 AM PDT
by
dirtboy
(Cure Arnold of groping - throw him into a dark closet with Janet Reno and shut the door.)
To: FourPeas
I have a job, and a good-paying one at that. However, I can't afford to plunk down the umpteen thousand dollars this guy's arsenal is worth.
78
posted on
10/17/2003 11:33:07 AM PDT
by
Junior
(Kinky is using a feather. Sick is using the whole chicken.)
To: samtheman
This guy sounds like a low level lunatic and loser. With the President and VP in his cross-hairs. Sounds like someone who would frequent Liberty Post.
To: Joe Brower
To: Chancellor Palpatine
Well, you certainly have your stereotypes all wrapped up in one handy package. You are letting your prejudices blind you to what you are advocating. By your statement, then, it is desireable to penalize all citizens because of the potential actions of a few miscreants.
You do realize that is one of the most-repeated and fundamental positions of the gun-grabbing left, do you not?
64 posted on 10/17/2003 11:20 AM PDT by Joe Brower ("If you need a lawyer to tell you what your rights are, you don't have any rights.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]
OPHie would have made a dandy Torie back in the Revolutionary war times. NO way in hell would he have taken up arms against the king. Maybe tried to screw the Queen but never fight the King.
And of course he would have justified his actions as doing his part.
That or he would have taken a vacation and gone fishing!
80
posted on
10/17/2003 11:38:06 AM PDT
by
Area51
(RINO hunter!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 481-497 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson