From this and other posts you have made it is evident you have an axe to grind with Larry.
Care to state why all the bile?
As examples, I cite for you:
1) the case of JW vs. Hallibuton and Dick Cheney. We come to find out months later that the case died a timely death because JW never followed up its filing with any discovery! Once again: Talk, talk, talk, and nothing to show for it.)
2) Klayman and the Fla. election fiasco. Larry zoomed in to Fla. to the hearing held by Judge Saul. Lawyers representing the various factions were given the opportunity to speak in the hearing. Larry stuck his mug in front of a microphone in the courtroom and asked to be heard. The judge asked him to identify himself and his connection to the business at hand. Upon hearing Larry's response, the Judge told him that he had no standing, that he could not speak. Now, grandstanding Larry knew that he had no standing. He represented no one (except himself.) He made an idiot of himself on national TV.
Larry Klayman is a loser. (Although I wish that he could do something to save Terri. I just see it as more grandstanding on his part. I'd also love it if he could successfully produce dirt on Hillary in the Peter Paul matter-- but I'm not holding my breath.)