Diana letter 'warned of car plot'( XXXX suspected of murder )

Daily Mirror / CNN ^ | 003/10/20

[Afronaut]

Who shot down JFK Jr.?

And never forget that if your small aircraft is missing in the N.E. Atlantic they will search for you the exact same manner. Navy and all. That was a direct quote at the time.

[Truth666]

Don't expect any story abou CLIXXXX and HITLXXX666 in connection with JFK Jr - shooting a plane would involve too many legal reasons.

[manna]

If Charles and both of his sons were dead, wouldn't the next in line to inherit the crown be Andrew and his two daughters? Then, Edward and any children he has? Then Anne and her two children?

[Truth666]

Oh I unveiled too much sorry. I meant HITXXXX666 !

[Right_in_Virginia]

So a whacko chic goes out partying with a bunch of drunks, including the driver, and they get into a car accident? Wow, what are the odds?

Now, don't go throwing logic at this story...this is series!

[doberville]

f you were a supporter of the Monarchy, a supporter of retaining the Christian heritage for Great Britain, and you wanted to prevent having the mother of the future King of England married to a Muslim..........would that make the possibility of a plot more "likely".

Ah, EXCELLENT question. Why would the reigning monarchy of GB want any Muslim half-siblings to the potential heir?

And, there are some amongst Her Majesty's finest who say amongst themselves that it was an assasination.

This one's a far better bet than most others.

[aristeides]

I would have thought a former king and brother of the reigning king who was known to be a Nazi sympathizer would have been much more of an object of concern to the palace. And they didn't kill the Duke of Windsor.

[Maximum Leader]

Now why would you want to bring verifiable facts (such as the order of succession) to a perfectly good conspiracy thread. :o)

[Eowyn-of-Rohan]

I don't believe the queen would have had someone killed so her son--the future king--could marry a divorced woman...

[manna]

Conspiracy theories are not as much fun when they fall apart too quickly ...

[Edmund Burke]

I think you are correct regarding the line of succession.

[manna]

Thanks!

[Irene Adler]

"Having a new line for the throne of England (through Diane) was a definite threat to the monarchy. If Charles and his son and Hewitt's son got murdered together from an IRA bomb going off, Diane's line would have had some claim to the throne. "<p.WRONG!!! The crown would pass straight to Randy Andy and eventually to his older daughter. No future potential children of Diana would have had any claim on the throne, ever.

[Brian Allen]

<< I know, some will say that is too fantastic .....

..... I think Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth, would have had trouble with a future King Mohammed of England. >>

No one will say it's "fantastic," just that you are ignorant of what you profess to "think"

Her Majesty will not have "trouble with a future king" for several reasons, the most obvious -- and the one that renders all of the others moot, being that she will be dead.

Another, to reafirm the point made below by Irene Adler, is that Diana's line would never have had any claim, save through His Royal Highness, the Prince of Wales.

And another that, given the once-great British sovereign's place as Head of the Church of England, the original Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church, only a member of that faith is constitutionally permitted to ascend the throne.

[Oztrich Boy]

Isn't XXXX an Austrailian beer?

Only in the state of Queensland (hey there's the connexion!) where they can't spell beer.

[Truth666]

river rat explained it at #24

[Pan_Yans Wife]

Why marry Camilla, when they are happily shacking up?

[Truth666]

Because Harry hasn't any Windsor blood - and thanks to new technology Camilla could still produce a heir.

[Pan_Yans Wife]

I find the claim that Harry isn't a Windsor intriguing... only because there are intimations that he is a hemophiliac, which has been rampant in the geneological lines of royalty.

You must know that the succession to the throne does not involve Dianna's blood, but only Charles'. William will be the next in line to the throne, after his father's reign.

Even if both William and then Harry reign, the crown would then pass on to Andrew and his offspring. So basically, it doesn't matter if Dianna had remarried or not.

Not only that, but all accounts given show that Dianna wanted William to be king. There would be no reason for her to even dream of the thought that a Fayed child would become king.

[Truth666]

That's right - but even if conspiracies are made public now (in this case the fact Diana was murdered by XXXX), you still will not hear the whole story (the real reason why).