Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Diana letter 'warned of car plot'( XXXX suspected of murder )
Daily Mirror / CNN ^ | 003/10/20

Posted on 10/20/2003 2:10:20 PM PDT by Truth666

Edited on 04/29/2004 2:03:17 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last
To: Truth666
Another point... as for Harry not being a legitimate heir, as long as Prince Charles believes (or... a long stretch, accepting the theory... ALLOWS) Harry to be deemed a rightful heir, that is the last word on the matter. The point is moot.

I suspect that if Buckingham Palace didn't want to claim Harry as an heir, they would have leaked that info to the press years ago, discrediting Dianna, and saving Charles' skin... he could have played the victim... husband of a cheating royal spouse, who was CAUGHT in the middle of a scandal.
61 posted on 10/21/2003 1:18:41 PM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife (You may forget the one with whom you have laughed, but never the one with whom you have wept.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
I agree. My #58 was sarcasm.
62 posted on 10/21/2003 1:23:59 PM PDT by Truth666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats
I promise to tell all in my first book: "It Takes Lying History". In addition to revealing who shot JFK, the book will also reveal who hired Craig Livingstone, who killed Vince Foster, who shot down TWA 800, and who killed Marilyn Monroe. (Hint: the same person was responsible for all of the above).

Elton John? With Marylin Monroe? Just damn!

63 posted on 10/21/2003 1:30:06 PM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: 76834
If she had been at home taking care of her kids, where she should have been, instead of running the streets in the middle of the night with a bunch of drunks there is an excellent chance she would still be alive...

Unless the Arab she was *running the strerets in the middle of the night with* was the father of her unborn child, and had proposed, providing a motive for an enraged Royal to avoid the humiliation of having a filty Arab and his get taint the beloved princess, more loved by the British people than the Queen herself.

And in which case, her husband's infidelity with *the Rottweiler* set the example for *turn about is fair play* then, didn't it? Pity the chap couldn't keep in in his trou.

-archy-/-

64 posted on 10/26/2003 4:22:08 PM PST by archy (Angiloj! Mia kusenveturilo estas plena da angiloj!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Oztrich Boy
Only in the state of Queensland (hey there's the connexion!) where they can't spell beer.

One needn't spell it to ask for a pot or slab of tinnies, so where's the need?

Red can please, mate!

-archy-/-

65 posted on 10/26/2003 4:27:50 PM PST by archy (Angiloj! Mia kusenveturilo estas plena da angiloj!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yans Wife
You are correct. If anything, I think the Fayed's wanted to be part of royalty, even if it is remotely through Diana. Dodi would have been the boy's father-in-law. Truly, I think Diana was being used by Dodi for access to the throne.
66 posted on 11/04/2003 11:02:22 AM PST by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Chemnitz
>>>>>Having a new line for the throne of England (through Diane) was a definite threat to the monarchy.<<<<<

What utter nonsense. With respect.

Diana, Princess of Wales, was only royal by virtue of her marriage to the H.R.H. the Prince of Wales, her part in producing children is constitutionally irrelevant. When she divorced the Prince of Wales, she was stripped of the title Her Royal Highness, and was only really given a royal funeral (if one can call that abomination a funeral) because of the pressure from the assorted anarchists who want to Monarchy to be as touchy-feely and left-wing as they are.

The line of succession is very clear, and is calculated to about 50 people; it follows nice simple rules.

H.R.H. the Prince of Wales (Charles),
Prince William of Wales,
Prince Harry (of Wales),
H.R.H. the Duke of York (Prince Andrew),
Princess Beatrice of York,
Princess Eugenie of York,
H.R.H. the Earl of Wessex (Edward),
H.R.H. the Princess Royal (Anne),
Peter Phillips (son of the Princess Royal),
Zara Phillips (daughter of the Princess Royal),
Viscount Linley (son of the late Princess Margaret),
the Hon. Charles Armstrong-Jones (Viscount Linley's son),
the Hon. Margarita Armstrong-Jones (Viscount Linley's daughter), &c.&c.

Note none of Princess Diana's family feature there, the ghastly Earl Spencer, and his lot are not royal.
67 posted on 11/06/2003 6:54:32 AM PST by tjwmason (A voice from merry England.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: archy
providing a motive for an enraged Royal to avoid the humiliation of having a filty Arab and his get taint the beloved princess, more loved by the British people than the Queen herself.

If Dianna would have given birth to Dodi's baby and if she married him, she would have still had problems in her life --- loads of scandal but this time with a playboy Arab instead of a prince. It seems to me it would have helped the royal family to let her go on with her life and lovers --- she would have humiliated herself more than anything.

68 posted on 11/08/2003 7:59:14 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: tjwmason
The Spencers have a claim to Stewart blood through, (IIRC) Charles the Second. But if we are going to bring the Stewarts back there are other families with better claim.
69 posted on 11/08/2003 8:15:40 AM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (No matter how subtle the wizard, a knife between the shoulder blades will seriously cramp his style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Truth666
Harry was born before Diana ever met Hewitt. That is well documented.

Harry looks just like Diana's brother.
70 posted on 11/08/2003 8:25:29 AM PST by Hillary's Lovely Legs (I have a plan. I need a dead monkey, empty liquor bottles and a vacuum cleaner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: tjwmason
I should amend the list of the succession as T.R.H. the Earl and Countess Wessex have just had a child (born by emergency c-section, mother and child are safe, Deo Gratias).

This daughter (as yet unnamed) fits between H.R.H. Earl Wessex, and the Princess Royal. Thus that part of the list now reads:

H.R.H. the Earl of Wessex (Edward),
Lady X Wessex (daughter of the Earl of Wessex),
H.R.H. the Princess Royal (Anne)
71 posted on 11/10/2003 5:21:13 AM PST by tjwmason (A voice from merry England.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson