Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush official caught in church dragnet
WND.com ^ | Wednesday, October 22, 2003 | Ann Coulter

Posted on 10/22/2003 4:29:07 PM PDT by perfect stranger

Bush official caught in church dragnet

In an emerging scandal, NBC News has produced tapes proving beyond deniability that the new deputy undersecretary of defense for intelligence is ... a Christian. Lt. Gen. William G. "Jerry" Boykin has been captured on a series of grainy tapes, attesting to his faith at churches and prayer breakfasts. Having driven the Judeo-Christian value system out of the public square, the classrooms and the Alabama Supreme Court, liberals now want to drive it out of church.

In one "inflammatory" remark, Boykin said that the enemy was not Osama bin Laden or Saddam Hussein, but "is a spiritual enemy. He's called the principality of darkness. The enemy is a guy called Satan."

Islamic leaders in the United States instantly denounced Boykin's unflattering characterization of bin Laden and Hussein as an attack on Islam. They haven't been this huffy since describing bin Laden as "not a true Muslim" and Hussein as a "secularist." If our enemies aren't "true Muslims," why are the "true Muslims" always so offended on their behalf?

James Zogby, president of the Arab American Institute, has called for Boykin to be fired. After the 9-11 attacks, Zogby said: "Regardless of who is ultimately found to be responsible for these terrorist murders, no ethnic or religious community should be treated as suspect and collectively blamed." But apparently they are collectively offended. They might want to think through the implications of that. If we have to apologize for the general, then maybe they should apologize for 9-11.

Zogby made the curious argument that Boykin is "unfit for the position" because he has "become a weapon our enemies will use against us." On Fox News' "Hannity and Colmes," a Clinton administration official made the same inane point, saying Boykin's remarks "could be used as a recruitment video for Osama bin Laden." I love the idea of moderate Arabs carefully poring over American newspapers before deciding whether or not to join al-Qaida.

In fact, an Arab-American was quoted in the Boston Globe saying Boykin's remarks "made most people in our community think the Bush administration is racist." That's interesting. The deputy undersecretary of defense calls Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein evil – and all those patriotic Arabs we keep hearing about are lost to Bush forever! Osama supporters are now moving decisively to the Dean camp.

In another talk, Gen. Boykin recalled seeing a Somalian warlord on television laughing at Americans and saying they would never capture him because his God, Allah, would protect him. Boykin said: "Well, you know what? I knew that my God was bigger than his. I knew that my God was a real God, and his was an idol."

A reporter for the Los Angeles Times claimed that Boykin referred to the God of Islam as "an idol." The reporter, of course, was committing a hate crime by assuming that fascist warlords trying to kill Americans are practicing "true Islam." As we have repeatedly been assured, they are not. Apparently, what Boykin should have said is: "Well, you know what? I knew that his remark was a violation of separation of church and state!"

In any event, I guess we've come a long way from calling our enemies "nips" and "krauts." Now we can't even say they're idolaters. When referring to people trying to kill Americans, how about we pull only from the list of names liberals use every day of the week for George Bush, Dick Cheney, John Ashcroft and Gen. Boykin?

Boykin also said the terrorists are "after us because we're a Christian nation." This is just silly. As Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad recently indicated in his speech before the Islamic Summit Conference, they are after us because we are a Jewish nation.

Last week Democratic presidential candidates speaking to an Arab-American conference were tripping over one another for the Osama-is-not-Satan vote by demanding Boykin's resignation. These characters are terrific at figuring how to fire anyone in the Bush administration except Norman Mineta. How about we trade in Mineta for the 20-year-old kid who managed to place boxcutters, bleach and molding clay on four airplanes? If only he had put them in his shoes! Then Norman Mineta would have caught him.

Sen. Kerry said Boykin's remarks were "un-American." The only people you can't call un-American are the ones burning the American flag or demanding an apology from a man who called Osama bin Laden satanic.

Howard Dean said the American flag "does not belong to Gen. Boykin," it belongs to all Americans. Could someone rustle up a liberal who actually owns a flag?

In the most pathetic case of pandering in recorded history, Sen. Joe Lieberman called for Boykin's resignation before the group, but still got booed. Lieberman said "the war on terror is a war on terrorists, not religion." Who is Lieberman standing up for here? Is he upset because Boykin compared the terrorists to Satan or Satan to the terrorists?

Boykin is a highly decorated officer who has participated in nearly every major military operation for the past 25 years – from Jimmy Carter's failed attempt to rescue hostages in Iran, to Reagan's successful invasion of Grenada, to Clinton's disastrous "Black Hawk Down" episode in Somalia. (Say, anyone notice a pattern?) No one has questioned the general's job qualifications. Liberals want him fired because he spoke in a church. If Gen. Boykin had been caught giving talks to NAMBLA instead of church groups, Democrats would be hailing him as a patriot for exercising his First Amendment rights.

Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., demanded that Boykin be reprimanded or reassigned, saying his views were "extreme," "closed-minded" and "zealous." We should be more open-minded toward people trying to kill us.

Rev. Welton Gaddy, president of the Interfaith Alliance, said Boykin's remarks "fly in the face of the pleas of the president and violate the basic principles of tolerance and inclusion that are implicit in the culture of this nation." Uh-oh. If liberals don't like what Boykin said about the terrorists, wait until they find out about the MOAB bombs the U.S. military has been dropping on them.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: anncoulter; williamboykin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 10/22/2003 4:29:07 PM PDT by perfect stranger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger
Islamic leaders in the United States instantly denounced Boykin's unflattering characterization of bin Laden and Hussein as an attack on Islam.

Truth hurts, doesn't it?

2 posted on 10/22/2003 4:32:48 PM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger
In one "inflammatory" remark, Boykin said that the enemy was not Osama bin Laden or Saddam Hussein, but "is a spiritual enemy. He's called the principality of darkness. The enemy is a guy called Satan.

I guess one should just limit one's remarks to calling the President a liar.

3 posted on 10/22/2003 4:32:56 PM PDT by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger
The Saudi murders who killed all those folks on 9-11 did so only because they believed they would go directly to a muslim paradise. It was not a political act, it was a religious act. Islam is a false religion, Mohamet is a false prophet. Their followers are evil.

Any Muslim who wants to divorce himself from the filth, corruption, and eveil of the Saudis, Saddam, and OBL is welcome to do so and do not much more than denounce the evil doers. But, most won't.

We start with all Muslims being evil, then move to "except those who renounce evil," and then attack those who are left, always remembering that the Saudi pigs are at the core of all Muslim evil.

4 posted on 10/22/2003 4:40:45 PM PDT by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger
Here is a perfect case of the liberal-bias against anything remotely being Christian, patriotic, or common sense. If moderate Muslims are against violence, let them state that they want peace with Israel and that they denounce the extremeists. Of course they will not do that because they secretly admire the balls that the extremeists show in doing all sorts of violence against civilians.

What better target to have than a true soldier that would cut their sticking hearts out if given a chance. Any true man, patriot, Christian, or conservative knows who the great-satan is, and that is the liberals in the media who worship allah-akbar with their every whisper.

Let them all eat, drink and bathe in sand as well as the camel-dung that they have been smoking for the past 3000 years.

Old Patriot

5 posted on 10/22/2003 4:43:20 PM PDT by old patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger
HEY!!! You broke the rules!!


6 posted on 10/22/2003 4:46:26 PM PDT by HighWheeler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HighWheeler
The ... axis of evil --- is a moneymaker for the liberals -- demonrats !

Let's target the republicans - conservatives - christians ... operations ho !


7 posted on 10/22/2003 4:51:02 PM PDT by f.Christian (evolution vs intelligent design ... science3000 ... designeduniverse.com --- * architecture * !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

AN ANN PING!

8 posted on 10/22/2003 4:52:40 PM PDT by COURAGE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Semper; perfect stranger
Bump to Semper.

Boykin makes anti-Christian "hate speech" cool again. Horray for all the scularists! Maybe Boykin's should be convicted of a capital crime for being a jew-lover and Christian. Certainly, his Islamic critics would love to impose such a sentence this warrior.

Yet, you still think he exercised "poor judgment" and should be cashiered, in spite of his service???

SFS

9 posted on 10/22/2003 4:54:16 PM PDT by Steel and Fire and Stone (F)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger


Bump for Ann!
10 posted on 10/22/2003 4:58:52 PM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger
Howard Dean said the American flag "does not belong to Gen. Boykin," it belongs to all Americans. Could someone rustle up a liberal who actually owns a flag?

Here's a letter to the editor (about a third of the way down) from a liberal who's concerned that an anti-flag-desecration amendment might slap millions of inoffensive liberals in jail for having American flag toilet paper:

http://timesargus.com/Opinion/Letters/Story/71723.html

11 posted on 10/22/2003 5:31:21 PM PDT by JoeSchem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger
Boykin also said the terrorists are "after us because we're a Christian nation." This is just silly. As Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad recently indicated in his speech before the Islamic Summit Conference, they are after us because we are a Jewish nation.

Zing!
12 posted on 10/22/2003 5:34:33 PM PDT by tet68 (multiculturalism is an ideological academic fantasy maintained in obvious bad faith. M. Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tacis
Any Muslim who wants to divorce himself from the filth, corruption, and eveil of the Saudis, Saddam, and OBL is welcome to do so and do not much more than denounce the evil doers. But, most won't.

Most won't because that would make them apostate and subject to death, tough choice, keep your mouth shut or die.
Too bad they will end up dying anyway.
13 posted on 10/22/2003 5:38:15 PM PDT by tet68 (multiculturalism is an ideological academic fantasy maintained in obvious bad faith. M. Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger
Nice one Ann. It speaks, quite well, for itself.
14 posted on 10/22/2003 6:03:36 PM PDT by TheDon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger
I'm wondering at what point the U.S. ceased protecting freedom of speech? Why is it unethical/wrong for a Christian to say things, let alone saying them in church? Hmf.
15 posted on 10/22/2003 8:06:04 PM PDT by Theo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tet68
I have not heard ONE Muslim condemn the Muslims that did 9-11...not one! That is why it's an evil religion...because people are AFRAID to speak out or ELSE they see nothing wrong with what happened...eh, James Zogby?????
16 posted on 10/22/2003 8:48:24 PM PDT by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger
Kudos to the headline writer!! All the liberals will RUN to this thread only to be shattered!!! HAHAHAHAHHA
17 posted on 10/22/2003 8:50:14 PM PDT by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger
#1. demoCommiecRATS against Christians!!!!(lead word not capitolised on purpose) In other words,....Evil against Good!!!! Showing their true colors once again, are'nt they?
18 posted on 10/22/2003 8:52:36 PM PDT by Defender2 (Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: perfect stranger
In an emerging scandal, NBC News has produced tapes proving beyond deniability that the new deputy undersecretary of defense for intelligence is ... a Christian. Lt. Gen. William G. "Jerry" Boykin has been captured on a series of grainy tapes, attesting to his faith at churches and prayer breakfasts.

Wow, this is the biggest scandal since it was discovered Ashcroft had prayer meetings in his office before starting work.
Remember that one?

19 posted on 10/22/2003 8:55:17 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
-I have to wonder "who" hates Christians more -- Islamic jihadists or dem liberals?
20 posted on 10/23/2003 6:21:57 AM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson