Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Hawk Wants Russia Out of G-8; Richard Perle has called for Russia to be expelled...
Moscow Times ^ | 10-30-03

Posted on 10/30/2003 5:33:02 PM PST by Brian S

By Simon Saradzhyan

Staff Writer Richard Perle, a hawkish policy adviser whose voice is heard in the Pentagon, has called for Russia to be expelled from the Group of Eight industrialized countries over the arrest of Yukos CEO Mikhail Khodorkovsky.

"Russia should be excluded from the G-8. No [other] G-8 country is allowed to treat its leading businessmen the way Russia treated Khodorkovsky," Perle was quoted as saying in Russian translation in the Thursday issue of Kommersant. "I believe Russia is moving fast in the wrong direction."

Perle, who believes that the White House should contain the Kremlin rather than cooperate with it, has criticized the campaign against Yukos shareholders from the beginning.

"It's possible already to say that real damage is being done to the prospects for future Russian economic growth and development by what appears to be an arbitrary, capricious and vindictive campaign against a private company," he said during a Moscow seminar in July after the arrest of Yukos shareholder Platon Lebedev.

Although he resigned as chairman of the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board, Perle retains strong influence on U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and is one of the leaders of the neo-conservative camp in Washington.

The influence of this camp on President George W. Bush has waned somewhat, but it is still strong when it comes to shaping U.S. defense policy, according to Alexander Pikayev, a military specialist at the Carnegie Moscow Center. The conservatives, however, can do little to influence Washington's relations with Russia, according to both Pikayev and Ivan Safranchuk, Moscow representative of the Washington-based Center for Defense Information.

Thus, Perle's appeal alone to exclude Russia from the G-8 will probably have little practical impact on the Bush administration's policy toward Russia, the experts said. However, it may set off a new round of criticism of President Vladimir Putin's domestic policies in the U.S. Congress, Safranchuk said.

Perle may be using the Yukos affair to push his vision of foreign policy that would contain Russia rather than elevate it to the status of a strategic partner, Safranchuk said.

"One player cannot have full control of such a game," he said, referring to those carrying out the attack on Yukos. "Other players start spinning this affair to advance their interests."

Perle also criticized the campaign in Chechnya and said he hoped that Russian oil companies would be denied contracts in postwar Iraq. He said the White House should be under no illusions that the Kremlin will help to end alleged development of nuclear weapons by Iran.

Perle was forced to step down as chairman of the Defense Policy Board last spring because of a potential conflict of interest between his duties on the Pentagon board and his defense-related business activities. He remained a board member.

He is not known to have any business ties with Yukos, Safranchuk said.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Russia
KEYWORDS: energy; khodorkovsky; oil; perle; yukos
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: JohnGalt
"Perle also criticized the campaign in Chechnya..."

I wish the article were a bit more clear on this point. Is it criticism of the policy being too weak, or too strong?

41 posted on 03/17/2004 7:35:44 AM PST by Sam's Army (Why is the left suddenly full of Biblical Scholars?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
Russia should not be in the G-8 at all. But not because of how it treats businessmen. It should not be in because the G-8 is a group of the world's richest countries, which Russia is not.

Russia's GDP per capita is lower than Mexico's - even on a PPP basis, the overall Russian economy is no larger than that of say Brazil. So why didn't Mexico or Brazil get into the G-8? Because they don't have nukes?

If it's an economic entity, then economic criteria should be used to qualify entry... not the possession of nukes. Otherwise the G-8 is a group of 7 rich nations, and one cry-baby nation that was given admission to calm it's temper after losing face on the global stage.

Looks to me like it's an economic organization and a palliative for ruffled feathered nuclear-armed former superpowers.
42 posted on 03/17/2004 7:43:44 AM PST by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Bon mots
Those are good points in so far as there is probably no reason whatsoever to even have a 'G-8', but my interest is following this slimy Perle character; he says the darnedest things.
43 posted on 03/17/2004 7:50:00 AM PST by JohnGalt (If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied. -- R. Kipling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Sam's Army
Too hard, I am sure. The CIA was messing around in Chechnya, Albania and of course Kosovo with elements of AQ and radical Islam in the 1990s, and at the end of the day, it was about oil politics.

Hmmm.

From 1/13/04

The last months have seen neocons, worst of all being Richard Perle, protest the growing power of Russian president Vladimir Putin. He sparked their ire by cracking down on the country’s oligarchs, especially Yukos boss Mikhail Khodorkovsky. The real outrage for the neocons was how this act sidelined a deal between Exxon-Mobil and Yukos, a deal which would have enormously enriched a professed political enemy of Putin while putting a large chunk of Russia’s energy supply under the control of an American company.

Yet it’s not just Exxon. Neocons fear that Russian oil might be diverted into pipeline projects to not only Japan but- most fearsome of all- China.

44 posted on 03/17/2004 7:55:45 AM PST by JohnGalt (If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied. -- R. Kipling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
"Neocons fear that Russian oil might be diverted into pipeline projects to not only Japan but- most fearsome of all- China."

Wonder how realistic that scenario is? Have the Russians really cozied up to China that much since the border skirmishes of the past (1960's I want to say?)

Buddy of mine was in Kazakhstan in the mid 1990's working with an oil company. He said he saw regular reports of tensions between those 2 countries along with footage of Kazakh troops moving to the shared border. Of course, nothing came of it.

45 posted on 03/17/2004 8:30:15 AM PST by Sam's Army (Why is the left suddenly full of Biblical Scholars?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Sam's Army
Found this on Pravada from 2002: Russia-China oil pipeline to be put into operation in 2005

Also: from 9/23/03 in China Daily Russia to live up to China oil pipeline deal

46 posted on 03/17/2004 8:49:41 AM PST by JohnGalt (If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied. -- R. Kipling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
Thanks.
47 posted on 03/17/2004 9:00:50 AM PST by Sam's Army (Why is the left suddenly full of Biblical Scholars?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson