Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Stultis
You didn't cite reading Fiske, but if you have, you haven't understood him, and certainly you show no evidence that you have read him. Neither have you read Darwin's last works, the ones he spent the last decades of his life working on, and the ones he was busy writing while others were organizing his old notes for edited hand picked trifles such as you prefer to consider most important to him.

But, you have answered my question as to whether or not your faith was as strong as Darwin's. It is clearly not. You have time though to learn. Hopefully a great deal of it.
123 posted on 11/02/2003 11:29:52 AM PST by Held_to_Ransom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]


To: Held_to_Ransom
I haven't read Fiske, only about him. Darwin's last book was about earthworms, and Darwin was most definitely NOT a man of "faith," except in his youth and young adulthood, as he himself made perfectly and explicitly clear. I have no idea what works (by Darwin) you are referring to. Possibly they were written by the author on the grassy knoll?
124 posted on 11/02/2003 11:39:17 AM PST by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

To: Held_to_Ransom
while others were organizing his old notes for edited hand picked trifles

Again, this is nut-job level nonsense. Most of Darwin's writings have long been available in COMPLETE AND UNEXPURGIATED editions for many years (the largest job, a complete edition of his correspondence, is well along with many volumes published), and the originals, in Darwin's own hand, have been available to scholars for decades.

125 posted on 11/02/2003 11:44:50 AM PST by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson