Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: spunkets
You are exaggerating. This is about killing people, it's about refusing med services.

Denying any person food and water both orally and by gastrototomy (note that Michael has explicitly blocked any efforts at oral feeding/hydration for Terri) will kill them. Not 50% of the time, not 95% of the time, but 100% of the time.

Should we release from prison all those who have been accused of fatally starving their children, on the basis that they didn't kill them--they merely "let them die"?

33 posted on 11/02/2003 9:51:21 AM PST by supercat (Why is it that the more "gun safety" laws are passed, the less safe my guns seem?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: supercat
" Denying any person food and water both orally"

Some people quit eating when they're dying. The only way to get them to eat is to force it and that's wrong. Folks honoring a dying man's wishes that everyone else just leave him alone is good. It's the right thing to do.

" and by gastrototomy"

Gastrotomy is a recent life support invention. I happen to live 20 east of the old fort Crawford where gastrotomy was discovered during the war of 1812, I think. I forgot the exact account, but it's at the Ft. Crawford medical museum.

"(note that Michael ..."

The topic was general, I was not addressing any specific case. If the person doesn't want med services, or any "help", then everyone else is obliged to honor the request.

34 posted on 11/02/2003 12:43:35 PM PST by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson