Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ragtime Cowgirl; dennisw; SJackson; knighthawk; yonif
Orson Scott Card:

The terrorists want a world war between all of Islam and everybody else, because they believe that in such a war Allah will give them the victory and the entire world will become Muslim (or at least be ruled by Muslims).

So leaving them alone will not cause them to leave us alone – it will encourage them to provoke us more.

Giving more aid or support to Muslim nations will not be seen as generosity, it will be seen as tribute or ransom money, and the credit will go to the terrorists ... thereby inviting further acts of terror. (This is the pattern that the Palestinian terrorists have already demonstrated for years.)

That is the thing that the advocates of “peace” just don’t seem to understand: Peace cannot be achieved unilaterally. When an enemy is determined to make war – even a pathetically weak and under-armed enemy – then a war will be fought ... or the enemy will become your conqueror.

War postponed never becomes easier to fight, or less costly in lives and treasure. And those who mock President Bush as a “cowboy” or even, insanely, claim that America (or “the Jews”) staged 9-11 just so we’d have an excuse for war will not, if their views prevail, bring about peace. They will simply bring about far more death.

And if we abandon this war, then a day will almost certainly come when all of us will look back with deep regret to the time when we might have rid the world of the scourge of extremist Muslim terrorism (meanwhile liberating more than a few Muslim nations from tyranny) at the astonishingly slight cost in blood and horror, compared to most wars, that we have paid so far in Afghanistan and Iraq.


3 posted on 11/03/2003 7:54:24 AM PST by Tolik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tolik
That is the thing that the advocates of “peace” just don’t seem to understand: Peace cannot be achieved unilaterally. When an enemy is determined to make war – even a pathetically weak and under-armed enemy – then a war will be fought ... or the enemy will become your conqueror.

Self-evident, and still not understood by the left.

7 posted on 11/03/2003 8:01:13 AM PST by XJarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Tolik
That's why I say play the endgame now. Take the Jihadists at their word. Take out Mecca, Medina, Qom tomorrow. And the Iranian nuclear program too. We do it or Israel does it. Destroy Allah's holy sites and you show him to be an impotent, lamer moon god not worth getting all worked up over.

Quite possibly our economy would do great after the curse of Islamic terror is lifted.
23 posted on 11/03/2003 9:16:02 AM PST by dennisw (G_d is at war with Amalek for all generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson