Skip to comments.
The Physics of Extra-Terrestrial Civilizations
http://www.mkaku.org/ ^
| unk
| Michio Kaku
Posted on 11/03/2003 12:44:23 PM PST by Michael Barnes
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240 ... 261 next last
To: helper
I had a treasure hunt that involved using a compass. Only one out of about 25 even knew how to use it.You heartless bastard. You crushed their self-esteem.
To: playball0
Sounds like navel gazing to me. Agreed. IF his assumptions are correct, he's still probably wrong.
202
posted on
11/04/2003 7:50:23 AM PST
by
r9etb
To: Congressman Billybob
There is also the possibility they are awaiting directions from the home office...
203
posted on
11/04/2003 7:56:13 AM PST
by
Junior
("Your superior intellects are no match for our puny weapons!")
To: RadioAstronomer
Do you advocate "polluting" or swarming a series of stars with self-replicating nano-probes?Two things: first history suggests that if such probes become possible, they will be built. Second, it is possible that some ethical way will be found to explore without overwhelming existing biosystems or cultures.
I'm thinking that in a few hundred years, such probes will be sentient and could justifiably be considered our grandchildren. Just a speculation.
204
posted on
11/04/2003 7:58:45 AM PST
by
js1138
To: Little Ray
Another theory: prodution is so automated and efficient, and entertainment is so incredibly advanced, that the entire population of advance civilizations are still at home wired into their "better than life" VR systems. Or even uploaded into the same. Apathy wins. Ah, yes... a perennial SciFi plotline.
205
posted on
11/04/2003 8:34:27 AM PST
by
Charles Martel
(Liberals are the crab grass in the lawn of life.)
To: RightWhale
Rare Earth
Definitely went against the grain when it was published. However, it makes a lot of sense. A lot more than most wishful thinking that is going on in this area.
I agree, I think this is the most plausible answer to Fermi's paradox.
206
posted on
11/04/2003 8:35:27 AM PST
by
Tac12
To: Reeses
but human evolution is something very different. It has developed very fast during the last 10,000 years, far too fast to be explained by ordinary evolution.
Can you elaborate on this point? I don't know if humans were that different 10,000 years ago. On the other hand, the fact that humans are much more intelligent than other animals (sorry for the creationists on this site) can be explained by a certain runaway proces like the plumage of peacocks. This is of course only a conjecture, but it is a nice one.
207
posted on
11/04/2003 8:44:30 AM PST
by
Tac12
To: js1138
Certainly possible. :-)
To: Tac12; RightWhale; boris; Physicist
Actually I think Fermi's paradox is garbage. IMHO, it was an offhand remark with little or no thought to it.
To: unix
http://www.eve-online.com/ This game is awesome.
Funny how to become a evolved planet you all have to be one. Crap I say. The smarter will over run the weak and stamp out stupidity. God place us on this earth to solve these problems and make them better.
To: unix; Senator Pardek
Oh..And this bad boy is MINE in April.... Here's my current "bad-boy", and a typical view of M13:
Discovery 10" PDHQ Dobsonian
211
posted on
11/04/2003 8:59:56 AM PST
by
Ignatz
(Helping people be more like me since 1960.)
To: Little Ray
Intellgent life may be vary rare indeed.Absolutely true, in fact so rare as to be completely absent with the majority of voters in NY, CA, MD, MA, NJ, CT, RI, IL , and DE.
212
posted on
11/04/2003 9:02:41 AM PST
by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
To: RadioAstronomer
Also, why would a race use the extremely valuable resources of their solar system to create one-way journeys that would give zero return for their effort?Possibly because intelligent probes would have their own reasons.
213
posted on
11/04/2003 9:04:17 AM PST
by
js1138
To: Tac12
Humans are no different than they were 10,000 years ago.
But, for 9,900 of those 10,000 years, we were stagnant at little more than small enclves of people growing little more than what was needed to survive, not even inhabiting millions of square miles of the 1/3 of the earth above water, and locked in little more than a "stone age"/unpowered society who used manual hand tools.
It fact, of the 15 billion years of the universe, we have only been using electricity for 125 years.
Who's to say WE aren't the most technologically advanced society out there.
214
posted on
11/04/2003 9:23:55 AM PST
by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only support FR by donating monthly, but ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: Ignatz
I have often wondered at the alt-az mount of these cannon. I have built ordinary equatorial mount scopes, grinding glass and all, but never thought to use an alt-az mount. Would it be difficult to mount the cradle at the polar angle? You'd have to add a bracket over the declination bearing and the range of declination would be restricted, but it would still be simple enough.
215
posted on
11/04/2003 9:34:32 AM PST
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
To: RadioAstronomer
Actually I think Fermi's paradox is garbage. IMHO, it was an offhand remark with little or no thought to it. I suppose that's a rather common view in SETI circles. I agree with you. But ol' Enrico certainly got us thinking, didn't he?
To: RightWhale
as they are, there is a "dobson's hole" if you're viewing straight up-it can be difficult to manuever.
You can get an inclined board for them, but for my use, it's fine the way it is.
Ground your own glass, eh? I'm impressed!
217
posted on
11/04/2003 9:57:37 AM PST
by
Ignatz
(Helping people be more like me since 1960.)
To: Ignatz
Ground your own glass It's a huge hobby! Requires total patience, but the result is an amazing thing if you think about it. Also, it might be an excellent hobby for retired folks. You can't make money at it, commercial optics are really inexpensive, but you can make specialty telescopes and even lenses.
218
posted on
11/04/2003 10:20:57 AM PST
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
To: RightWhale
I've read a lot about it. Mybe when I'm retired!
Right now, two daughters (11y and 18m) use up most of my available patience, lol!
219
posted on
11/04/2003 10:39:04 AM PST
by
Ignatz
(Helping people be more like me since 1960.)
To: Ignatz
Yeah, I know. The big thing is setting apart a dust-free place to do grinding and optical testing. You'll need a fairly long sightline so you can check focal lengths and mirror figures. It isn't easy with a growing family inhabiting the same space.
220
posted on
11/04/2003 11:43:21 AM PST
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240 ... 261 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson