Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Thanks, and apologies to whoever thinks this is a stupid post. And I only put Hannity's URL in because it wouldn't let me post without one.
1 posted on 11/04/2003 1:27:19 PM PST by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: jocon307
Haven't read this whole, lengthy thread.....so this has probably already been mentioned......but Britt Hume had a field day with this. Of course, Jay Rockefeller's office quicly contacted FNC and claimed this was just a "draft done by a staffer" and hadn't been handed out to any members of Congress, etc. Yeah, right.

Good on FNC for showing the Dems for exactly what they are: a bunch of petty, treasonous power hungry pissants who'd sell their country and their souls to be able to grab and redistribute more of YOUR money. It really is that simple. That is ALL they stand for. God forgive me for how much I despise the Democratic Party.

706 posted on 11/04/2003 6:46:51 PM PST by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jocon307
That's probably why the White House is hesitant to send this committee too much information. They never know WHEN it will be leaked by the Dems. You notice I didn't say 'IF'!
712 posted on 11/04/2003 6:51:15 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jocon307
Speaking of the Intelligence Committee:

Whatever happened to Chandra Levy?
729 posted on 11/04/2003 7:12:23 PM PST by P.O.E.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jocon307
Sean mentioned Free Republic today in his show.
(during the fast-paced call in segment)

A caller asked him what his logon name is for the Hannity forum. He said he just lurks. He doesn't post.
"Just like at Free Republic... I just lurk."
737 posted on 11/04/2003 7:32:29 PM PST by edwin hubble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jocon307
Hannity is playing this big time, and I am glad. Expose the rat's and work for America!
769 posted on 11/04/2003 8:30:59 PM PST by SeeRushToldU_So (Whacha think?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jocon307
This story worries me .. I wonder if Hannity was set up. The story could be true...could be false .. but there is certainly not enough info to validate it against. It's an undocumented source and so far, there is no other corroborating info.

I checked the Fox website today and it is not even mentioned on the front page OR in Hannity's section of the website. This is what happens when a story does not have "legs".

Call me a skeptic if you like .. but you need to wait and see with stories like this. Nobody else is touching it .. not even Drudge. Am I the only person who see's some danger?

I just hope that Hannity handled it with a disclaimer .. "it could be true or it could be a setup". The Left is out to get Hannity .. and nobody knows it better than he does. He could have been fed this story in order to discredit him

At any rate, I'm sure we will all know soon enough if the story has "legs" or if Hannity is going to back away from it.

779 posted on 11/04/2003 9:15:06 PM PST by CometBaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jocon307; Mo1; prairiebreeze; CometBaby; tgslTakoma; Alamo-Girl; Starbreed; truthkeeper; bart99; ...
**** Here is where the story is going in the capable hands of bipartisanship! ***

Roberts says memo undermines inquiry

Note discusses creating an independent commission to study Iraq prewar intelligence

By Libby Quaid

The Associated Press

WASHINGTON -- Republican Sen. Pat Roberts said Democrats have undermined the inquiry he is leading into Iraq prewar intelligence by drafting a memo aimed at discrediting the Senate Intelligence Committee's work.

The Kansan is chairman of the committee. The memo was written by Democratic committee staff and wasn't finalized or circulated among members of the committee, said the panel's senior Democrat, West Virginia Sen. Jay Rockefeller.

Rockefeller acknowledged the document after news reports quoted excerpts from it. The memo spells out steps to make the committee's inquiry irrelevant by setting up an independent commission, and in the process attempt to "castigate" majority Republicans. It suggested "pulling the trigger" on the plan "probably next year."

Roberts said the memo stunned him.

"It's like a personal slap in the face," he said. "I'm very frustrated by it."

"We cannot politicize the committee," he said. "No member of the intelligence community wants to come up and testify before a committee that is whipsawed by politics. In addition, once this becomes public, or more public, every intelligence agency in the world will take note of it."

"And quite frankly, I think this will give some comfort to terrorists," he told The Associated Press in a telephone interview Tuesday evening. "We have to put back together some semblance of a bipartisan committee."

Roberts and Rockefeller have been overseeing an often rocky review of intelligence on weapons of mass destruction that the White House used to justify the war on Iraq.

The two men met Tuesday after Roberts learned of the memo. In a statement he issued afterward, Rockefeller dismissed the memo as "likely taken from a waste basket or through unauthorized computer access."

He added: "The draft memo was not approved, nor was it shared with any member of the Senate Intelligence Committee or anyone else.

"Having said that, the memo clearly reflects staff frustration with the conduct of the Senate Intelligence Committee investigation and the difficulties of obtaining information from the administration."

He said that exploring or asserting the rights of the committee's Democratic minority doesn't politicize the process.

"The American people deserve a full accounting of why we sent our sons and daughters into war," Rockefeller said.

Democrats and Republicans alike have complained the White House, the CIA, the Pentagon and the State Department have been slow to respond to requests for interviews and documents.

The White House missed a Friday deadline for complying, and while Roberts announced over the weekend the White House agreed to cooperate, he subsequently backed away and said he spoke too hastily.

Roberts called on committee Democrats to repudiate the strategy outlined in the memo.

"It's a purely partisan document that appears to be a road map for how the Democrats intend to politicize what should be a bipartisan, objective review of pre-war intelligence," he said. "Instead, we should be focusing on how to make our country safer and how to improve our intelligence capabilities."

806 posted on 11/05/2003 6:53:49 AM PST by sonsofliberty2000 (I am the armchair activist. Flamesuit ready, Dr. Pepper flowing. Able to post in a single click.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jocon307

Memo-gate is alive and well.


834 posted on 11/01/2005 3:42:55 PM PST by MamaLucci (Mutually assured destruction STILL keeps the Clinton administration criminals out of jail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson