Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why must we pretend the 40th president was alert and engaged?
Slate ^ | Timothy Noah

Posted on 11/07/2003 6:23:36 AM PST by CC Bonnocco

Thunderous protest has persuaded CBS to cancel The Reagans, its miniseries about America's 40th president and his second wife. (The series will air instead on Showtime, which shares a corporate parent with CBS.) It isn't especially troubling that CBS would bow to angry protesters in canceling The Reagans, given that the miniseries itself, if at all typical of the genre, is likely a piece of hackwork. (Those who live by popular tastes, die by popular tastes.) But it is troubling that the public, or at least a highly influential segment of it, has apparently ruled any criticism of President Reagan out of bounds. When did the Gipper become St. Ronald?

Among the miniseries's themes that drew particular complaint, Jim Rutenberg reported in the Oct. 20 New York Times, was that Reagan "suffered moments of forgetfulness" and took a "laissez-faire" stance in handling the White House staff. Ed Morrow, who organized a boycott to pressure CBS into dropping the miniseries, complained in National Review Online:

[I]t is a portrait of Reagan that is unrecognizable outside of an old, lame Saturday Night Live skit. It is a caricature. Indeed, Brolin's heavily rouged, orange-haired Reagan is a caricature of the standard liberal caricature of Reagan. He is a doddering fool, stumbling around using his acting talents to pass for a statesman.

Reagan was no doddering fool, but his rather extreme mental and emotional detachment were at the time noted not only by his critics but by many of his political allies. Liberals like Chatterbox who struggled to persuade themselves that Reagan had more on the ball than he seemed saw their worst suspicions confirmed in the memoirs of former Reagan aides. Here's former chief of staff Donald Regan in For the Record:

In the four years that I served as Secretary of the Treasury I never saw President Reagan alone and never discussed economic philosophy or fiscal and monetary policy with him one-on-one. From first day to last at Treasury, I was flying by the seat of my pants. The President never told me what he believed or what he wanted to accomplish in the field of economics.

Here's speechwriter Peggy Noonan, describing her first encounter with President Reagan in the White House in What I Saw at the Revolution:

I was surprised how big his hearing aid is, or rather how aware of it you are when you're with him. There was a quizzical look on his face as he listened to what was going on around him, and I thought, He doesn't really hear very much, and his appearance of constant good humor is connected to his deafness. He misses much of what is not said directly to him, but he assumes it is good.

Here's communications director David Gergen, in Eyewitness to Power:

Reagan could be remarkably unaware of (and indifferent to) developments around him. If I were still working for him, I would probably pass it off as being "intellectually selective." But it's hard for anyone to argue that he knew as much as a president should about the state of the world.

His inattention to details and hands-off stance could be dangerous for his leadership. His Republican allies in the Senate believed that because he did not pay close enough heed, he turned down a budget deal in 1985 that they had carefully crafted to cut the deficits. By their account, he didn't seem to understand the terms of the deal. … Majority Leader Bob Dole was furious at the time.

All these former aides went on to say, in one way or another, that in the end things somehow managed to work out for the best. That's a topic for legitimate debate. But none seemed to disagree with the proposition that President Reagan was not all there.

Today, however, etiquette demands that we pretend never to have noticed. Why? Reagan's Alzheimer's, which reportedly has reduced him to a near-vegetative state, is one reason. It's thought in poor taste to speak ill of the very faculty that his disease has wiped out. Another factor is Reagan's symbolic role as the ideological wellspring of today's conservative movement. In the 1980s, he was merely president, but by now Reagan has been so identified with conservatism that any criticism of the man is taken to be an attack on the ideology. And of course, the passage of time usually renders any public figure more admired than he was during his own era.

Ironically, conservatives like Republican National Committee chairman Ed Gillespie, who called on CBS to cancel The Reagans, were probably acting against their own interest. Airing a miniseries about Ronald Reagan on network TV would likely have enhanced the aura of glamour that already surrounds him. According to Rutenberg in the Times, the miniseries "does give Mr. Reagan most of the credit for ending the cold war and paints him as an exceptionally gifted politician and a moral man who stuck to his beliefs, often against his advisers' urgings." So what if it fails to credit President Reagan with creating a lengthy economic expansion (though not as lengthy as the one overseen by Bill Clinton) or with "delivering the nation from the malaise of the Jimmy Carter years" (achieved mainly by a drop in oil prices)? Even its clearly false notes could easily burnish rather than harm Reagan's image. For instance, its apparent picture of Reagan as a homophobe ("They that live in sin shall die in sin," he says by way of justifying inaction on AIDS) is much more flattering than the truth, which is that Reagan was (in Hendrik Hertzberg's exquisite formulation) a "closet tolerant" who back-burnered the AIDS issue out of political expediency. Biographies and TV dramas about the Kennedys have grown steadily more critical and salacious over the years, but they don't seem to have diminished the nation's Camelot obsession. By rendering criticism of Ronald Reagan taboo, conservatives act against their long-term interest in maintaining his status as a culture hero. It's very difficult to sustain passion, over time, for a plaster saint.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antireagan; barfalert; boycottviacom; cbs; cbsnews; dusrupter; kittenchow; lyingliars; propaganda; ratherbiased; reaganbashing; revisionists; seebs; showtime; strikeupthebanned; thisaccountisbanned; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-137 next last

1 posted on 11/07/2003 6:23:36 AM PST by CC Bonnocco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CC Bonnocco; Admin Moderator
5...4...3...
2 posted on 11/07/2003 6:24:47 AM PST by Judith Anne (Send a message to the Democrat traitors--ROCKEFELLER MUST RESIGN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CC Bonnocco
Mr. Noah should be SO alert &engaged. We all know...that ALL Presidents have AIRCRAFT CARRIERS NAMED AFTER THEM
3 posted on 11/07/2003 6:26:00 AM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I will defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
Why do you want this article removed?

If you disagree with it, defend your position (assuming you can).
4 posted on 11/07/2003 6:26:39 AM PST by CC Bonnocco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
We have a USS Carter?
5 posted on 11/07/2003 6:27:07 AM PST by DeuceTraveler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CC Bonnocco
Thunderous protest has persuaded CBS to cancel The Reagans, its miniseries about America's 40th president and his second wife.>>

It's telling that this is the same rag that thinks that anal sodomists are committing an act of marriage.
6 posted on 11/07/2003 6:28:06 AM PST by Ronly Bonly Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CC Bonnocco
Any Bio info on this guy?
7 posted on 11/07/2003 6:28:29 AM PST by The South Texan (The Democrat Party and the leftist (ABCCBSNBCCNN NYLATIMES)media are a criminal enterprise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CC Bonnocco
Here's the deal Timmy boy - there are too many people still alive who remember RR's stirring speech at the 1988 Rep Convention and even the 1992. This was not a man who according to the Streisand revisionists/character assassins was losing his faculties by the mid eighties. That's just to take one example.
8 posted on 11/07/2003 6:28:35 AM PST by Let's Roll (And those that cried Appease! Appease! are hanged by those they tried to please!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CC Bonnocco
Why must whiny DUmbass leftists always INSIST that Reagan was not alert or engaged?
9 posted on 11/07/2003 6:28:36 AM PST by Petronski (Living life in a minor key.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CC Bonnocco
Not a chance, disruptor. Not a frikken chance, troll.

I hate seeing bleep like this on FR. Hate it, I tell you!

BEGONE!
10 posted on 11/07/2003 6:28:48 AM PST by Judith Anne (Send a message to the Democrat traitors--ROCKEFELLER MUST RESIGN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne

I love the smell of Zot in the morning. Smells like victory.
11 posted on 11/07/2003 6:29:52 AM PST by Malsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CC Bonnocco; Constitution Day; VRWCmember; Zavien Doombringer; 4mycountry; Poohbah; dighton; ...
Signs up today, just post this slanderous tripe?

Yeah. Right.

The Mighty Thor has been notified.

12 posted on 11/07/2003 6:30:05 AM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeuceTraveler
Check your gear . . . I think your sarcasmeter might be jammed.
13 posted on 11/07/2003 6:30:19 AM PST by Petronski (Living life in a minor key.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Whiny DU dumba$$es? Would you put Don Regan in that category?
14 posted on 11/07/2003 6:30:40 AM PST by CC Bonnocco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CC Bonnocco
Reagan was a great President
Clintoon was a lousy one.

Get over it!
Stop trying to bring a good man down to prop legacy of your guy up!

15 posted on 11/07/2003 6:30:52 AM PST by right way right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Malsua
Egg-Zachary (punch line to an old joke).
16 posted on 11/07/2003 6:31:07 AM PST by Judith Anne (Send a message to the Democrat traitors--ROCKEFELLER MUST RESIGN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CC Bonnocco
Ah, because he was!
17 posted on 11/07/2003 6:31:30 AM PST by carton253 (To win the War on Terror, raise at once the black flag!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CC Bonnocco
Reagan was so out of touch that he was a failure?

The economy, the Berlin wall, etc. prove otherwise.

Welcome to FR.
18 posted on 11/07/2003 6:31:36 AM PST by Pan_Yans Wife (You may forget the one with whom you have laughed, but never the one with whom you have wept.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CC Bonnocco

Begone.....
19 posted on 11/07/2003 6:31:37 AM PST by Tijeras_Slim (SSDD - Same S#it Different Democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CC Bonnocco
We put YOU in that category, Bleep.
20 posted on 11/07/2003 6:31:51 AM PST by Judith Anne (Send a message to the Democrat traitors--ROCKEFELLER MUST RESIGN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-137 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson