Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN Regrets Role In Planting US Dem Presidential Debate Question
AP via Dow Jones | 11/11/03 | AP Staff

Posted on 11/11/2003 9:08:02 AM PST by BunnySlippers

CNN Regrets Role In Planting US Dem Pres Debate Question

PROVIDENCE, R.I. (AP)--A Cable News Network producer went "too far" when the news organization told a student what question to ask during last week's Democratic presidential candidate debate in Boston, a spokeswoman for the news network said.

During the debate, co-sponsored by the nonprofit Rock the Vote organization, Brown University student Alexandra Trustman asked the candidates whether they preferred the PC or Mac format for their computers.

In an editorial she wrote for The Brown Daily Herald, the university's student newspaper, Trustman said CNN, a unit of TimeWarner (TWX), told her to ask the question.

In a statement Tuesday, a CNN spokeswoman said the cable network regrets the producer's actions.

"In an attempt to encourage a lighthearted moment in this debate, a CNN producer working with Ms. Trustman clearly went too far," said spokeswoman Christa Robinson.

A message left Tuesday for Trustman wasn't immediately returned and she didn't respond to an e-mail from The Associated Press. A woman who answered Trustman's phone said Trustman didn't want to comment.

In her editorial in the Daily Herald, Trustman wrote that she was called the morning of the debate and given the topic of the question the CNN producers wanted her to ask. Trustman said she was "confused by the question's relevance," and constructed what she thought was a more relevant question "about how, if elected, the candidates would use technology in their administrations."

But when she arrived in Boston for the debate, Trustman wrote, "I was handed a note card with the Macs and PCs version of Clinton's boxers or briefs question" and told she couldn't ask her question "because it wasn't lighthearted enough and they wanted to modulate the event with various types of questions."


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Unclassified
KEYWORDS: 2004; cablenewsnetwork; chickennoodlenews; cnn; cnnschadenfreude; electionpresident; rockthevote; schadenfreude
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-74 next last

1 posted on 11/11/2003 9:08:02 AM PST by BunnySlippers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Schadenfreude
2 posted on 11/11/2003 9:10:11 AM PST by martin_fierro (_____oooo_(____)_oooo_____)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
CNN Regrets Role In Planting US Dem Pres Debate Question

My, my...caught trying to make news instead of reporting it. How liberally typical.

3 posted on 11/11/2003 9:11:03 AM PST by woofer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
"CNN Regrets Role In Planting US Dem Presidential Debate Question"

Say, I wonder if CNN Regrets Role in serving as an anti-American, "Liberal", Democrat Party propaganda machine???

4 posted on 11/11/2003 9:11:08 AM PST by Savage Beast (Happiness is the best IQ test.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
a CNN producer ... clearly went too far,"

CNN clearly goes too far on any day ending in "y".

5 posted on 11/11/2003 9:11:18 AM PST by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
Is that German for "shot self in foot"? He-he-he...
6 posted on 11/11/2003 9:11:18 AM PST by talleyman (Caviar emptor (a warning from the sturgeon general))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
CNN manufacturing the news? I'm firmly disillusioned.
7 posted on 11/11/2003 9:11:46 AM PST by per loin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
Trustman lived up to her name, and CNN lived up to its tradition.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Phonies.

8 posted on 11/11/2003 9:12:07 AM PST by Pharmboy (Dems lie 'cause they have to...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

and told she couldn't ask her question "because it wasn't lighthearted enough and they wanted to modulate the event with various types of questions."

I thought this was interesting ... Lighthearted? Why?

9 posted on 11/11/2003 9:13:08 AM PST by BunnySlippers (Help Bring Colly-fornia Back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg
bump
10 posted on 11/11/2003 9:13:39 AM PST by nutmeg ("The DemocRATic party...has been hijacked by a confederacy of gangsters..." - Pat Caddell, 11/27/00)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers; Dog; MJY1288; Howlin
But when she arrived in Boston for the debate, Trustman wrote, "I was handed a note card with the Macs and PCs version of Clinton's boxers or briefs question" and told she couldn't ask her question "because it wasn't lighthearted enough and they wanted to modulate the event with various types of questions."

CNN came up with that stupid question??

Figures

Wonder what other questions they had the students ask?

11 posted on 11/11/2003 9:14:04 AM PST by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
Alexandra Trustman

What irony! This young lady needs to learn quickly not to trust the media, particularly when it comes to politics.

I'm not a bit surprised at CNN wanting to lob softballs at the 'rats .... it's their specialty.

12 posted on 11/11/2003 9:15:19 AM PST by kayak (The Vast, Right-Wing Conspiracy is truly Vast! [JohnHuang2])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
CNN regrets that it was caught planting questions.
13 posted on 11/11/2003 9:15:42 AM PST by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
CNN doesn't regret doing it. They regret getting caught. There is a difference.
14 posted on 11/11/2003 9:15:45 AM PST by Snowy (Annoy a lib -> Work hard, earn money, and be happy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
Yeah right. Just like CNN regrets covering up Saddams' human rights abuses in exchange for access to his spokesmen.
15 posted on 11/11/2003 9:16:06 AM PST by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: talleyman
Good one!

Exact translation of "Schadenfreude" is difficult, but more-or-less, it means "taking pleasure in someone else's pain or suffering."

Generally it's not a good thing, but I do have some pleasure in CNN's being exposed for the Dem mouthpiece/propaganda organ it clearly is.

16 posted on 11/11/2003 9:16:31 AM PST by Prov3456
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
Schadenfreude

And epicaricacy.

17 posted on 11/11/2003 9:17:09 AM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
CNN: We Report, We Decide.
18 posted on 11/11/2003 9:17:59 AM PST by Interesting Times (ABCNNBCBS -- yesterday's news.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
CNN Regrets Role In Planting US Dem Presidential Debate Question

no, cnn only regrets getting caught

19 posted on 11/11/2003 9:18:05 AM PST by InvisibleChurch (Like sittin' on pins and needles, things fall apart, it's scientific.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
What a minute, we need to parse CNN's statements like we parsed the Clinton Admin's. So if CNN admits its producers staged a light-hearted question, it suggests that they also may have staged other questions. To avoid getting busted hard on that, they chose to reveal that they planted an innocent one. Story gets covered, and they move on, hoping that no one will dig deeper.

The real question is: Did CNN plant other questions, and has this producer done this before in other debates?
20 posted on 11/11/2003 9:19:15 AM PST by Diddle E. Squat (www.firemackbrown.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Any minute now CNN will talk about this story and air an apology...

any minute now...
21 posted on 11/11/2003 9:19:56 AM PST by DeuceTraveler ((wedgie free for all))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
What a minute = Wait a minute
22 posted on 11/11/2003 9:19:58 AM PST by Diddle E. Squat (www.firemackbrown.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Prov3456
Yes, and the English word for schadenfreude is epicaricacy.
23 posted on 11/11/2003 9:21:50 AM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
Okie dokie Mr Goebells, whatever you say as long as it's for the greater good.
24 posted on 11/11/2003 9:22:15 AM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Consort
epicaricacy

Wat dat? (A form of government run by epicures?)

25 posted on 11/11/2003 9:22:47 AM PST by Maceman ("To die with your sword still in its sheath is most regrettable" -- Miyomoto Musashi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
Anybody bother to ask CNN if they "planted" any other cards?
26 posted on 11/11/2003 9:22:52 AM PST by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
In an editorial she wrote for The Brown Daily Herald, the university's student newspaper, Trustman said CNN, a unit of TimeWarner (TWX), told her to ask the question.

And just like a good little soldier, she did what they asked.
27 posted on 11/11/2003 9:25:10 AM PST by Xenalyte (I may not agree with your bumper sticker, but I'll defend to the death your right to stick it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
Raises all kinds of questions, like was any candidate prepped by CNN to endorse PC or Mac in their answer, was Apple or a PC maker paying for this question as a form of advertising, was 'boxers or briefs' a prepped question...
28 posted on 11/11/2003 9:28:04 AM PST by Grig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
See post #23.
29 posted on 11/11/2003 9:28:21 AM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
Raises all kinds of questions, like was any candidate prepped by CNN to endorse PC or Mac in their answer, was Apple or a PC maker paying for this question as a form of advertising, was 'boxers or briefs' a prepped question...
30 posted on 11/11/2003 9:28:55 AM PST by Grig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Consort
I can't even pronounce that!

I wasn't aware that such a word exists in English. How is it pronounced?

31 posted on 11/11/2003 9:29:37 AM PST by Prov3456
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
Is it my imagination, or is every liberal news org getting the huge shaft lately?
32 posted on 11/11/2003 9:30:25 AM PST by Lazamataz (PROUDLY SCARING FELLOW FREEPERS SINCE 1999 !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
How sorry are they? Is the producer still working at CNN?
33 posted on 11/11/2003 9:31:10 AM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
More proof that Bernard Goldberg's BIAS, is correct.
34 posted on 11/11/2003 9:33:02 AM PST by Burlem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
I imagine this young lady was razzed mercilessly about such why she would ask such a stupid question. No wonder she blew the whistle on CNN--it was CNN who was stupid.
35 posted on 11/11/2003 9:33:21 AM PST by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prov3456
"epicaricacy."

eh-pee-CARE-ih-cah-see.

Michael

36 posted on 11/11/2003 9:33:42 AM PST by Wright is right! (Never get excited about ANYTHING by the way it looks from behind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Prov3456
How is it pronounced?

epicaricacy
/ep"-i-kar-ik'-i-see/ taking pleasure in another's misfortune: schadenfreude

37 posted on 11/11/2003 9:34:18 AM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Wright is right!
can you precisely define that please?
38 posted on 11/11/2003 9:37:40 AM PST by wardaddy (...and Yes, I'll be your huckleberry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
Can't find much difference between planting a question and the way CNN fabricates much of the actual news.
39 posted on 11/11/2003 9:38:44 AM PST by Dustbunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
This story is getting played wrong. In a DEBATE -- CNN was caught planting softball questions in the audience. I wonder how many others didn't step forward? I couldn't keep up with the STUPID softballs that were being thrown in that debate. It mirrors how CNN treats its reporting of the DNC.
40 posted on 11/11/2003 9:42:16 AM PST by Naspino (I am in no way associated with the views expressed in your posts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
Once again, RI's own local lefty rag doesn't carry this story.

Once again, I learn local news from FR before I learn it from any of our state-wide news outlets.
41 posted on 11/11/2003 9:44:49 AM PST by ItsOurTimeNow ("Forth now, and fear no darkness!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Consort
Awesome. Thank you. I learn something new every day!
42 posted on 11/11/2003 9:45:54 AM PST by Prov3456
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers; Doctor Raoul; Liz; LS; Howlin; Lazamataz; Sabertooth; William McKinley; remember; ...
But the obvious question isn't being asked of CNN by that AP reporter:

Did CNN give these staged questions to the candidates (or perhaps, just to *one* of the candidates) in advance?

43 posted on 11/11/2003 9:49:35 AM PST by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: woofer
heck...it's just what I expected to hear
44 posted on 11/11/2003 9:51:37 AM PST by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/914941/posts

CNN Concedes, Sort of, Distorted "Assault Weapon" Demonstration (CNN Fraud Alert!!!)




Who would have guessed that CNN would (Gasp) LIE!!!!
45 posted on 11/11/2003 9:52:32 AM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Correctomundo! How can we trust any debate those losers run? They could be handing questions to candidates, the audience, sabotaging certain candidates make-up, screwing up audio, etc. etc.

CNN lost all credibility from me a long time ago, but I am delighted to see further evidence of their corruption.

46 posted on 11/11/2003 9:56:58 AM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
Call CNN's viewer response number:

The local number is 404-827-0234

You can chose to speak to a real person or leave a message.

CNN does NOT have a toll free viewer response number.
47 posted on 11/11/2003 9:57:09 AM PST by Republican Red (Karmic hugs welcomed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #48 Removed by Moderator

To: BunnySlippers
Regrets only because they were outed.
49 posted on 11/11/2003 9:59:56 AM PST by Joe Bfstplk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Consort
GuruNet?
50 posted on 11/11/2003 10:09:07 AM PST by Humbug (i haven't the foggiest idea what to type here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson