Skip to comments.
CNN Regrets Role In Planting US Dem Presidential Debate Question
AP via Dow Jones
| 11/11/03
| AP Staff
Posted on 11/11/2003 9:08:02 AM PST by BunnySlippers
CNN Regrets Role In Planting US Dem Pres Debate Question
PROVIDENCE, R.I. (AP)--A Cable News Network producer went "too far" when the news organization told a student what question to ask during last week's Democratic presidential candidate debate in Boston, a spokeswoman for the news network said.
During the debate, co-sponsored by the nonprofit Rock the Vote organization, Brown University student Alexandra Trustman asked the candidates whether they preferred the PC or Mac format for their computers.
In an editorial she wrote for The Brown Daily Herald, the university's student newspaper, Trustman said CNN, a unit of TimeWarner (TWX), told her to ask the question.
In a statement Tuesday, a CNN spokeswoman said the cable network regrets the producer's actions.
"In an attempt to encourage a lighthearted moment in this debate, a CNN producer working with Ms. Trustman clearly went too far," said spokeswoman Christa Robinson.
A message left Tuesday for Trustman wasn't immediately returned and she didn't respond to an e-mail from The Associated Press. A woman who answered Trustman's phone said Trustman didn't want to comment.
In her editorial in the Daily Herald, Trustman wrote that she was called the morning of the debate and given the topic of the question the CNN producers wanted her to ask. Trustman said she was "confused by the question's relevance," and constructed what she thought was a more relevant question "about how, if elected, the candidates would use technology in their administrations."
But when she arrived in Boston for the debate, Trustman wrote, "I was handed a note card with the Macs and PCs version of Clinton's boxers or briefs question" and told she couldn't ask her question "because it wasn't lighthearted enough and they wanted to modulate the event with various types of questions."
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Unclassified
KEYWORDS: 2004; cablenewsnetwork; chickennoodlenews; cnn; cnnschadenfreude; electionpresident; rockthevote; schadenfreude
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-74 next last
To: Timesink
Schadenfreude
2
posted on
11/11/2003 9:10:11 AM PST
by
martin_fierro
(_____oooo_(_°_¿_°_)_oooo_____)
To: BunnySlippers
CNN Regrets Role In Planting US Dem Pres Debate QuestionMy, my...caught trying to make news instead of reporting it. How liberally typical.
3
posted on
11/11/2003 9:11:03 AM PST
by
woofer
To: BunnySlippers
"CNN Regrets Role In Planting US Dem Presidential Debate Question"Say, I wonder if CNN Regrets Role in serving as an anti-American, "Liberal", Democrat Party propaganda machine???
4
posted on
11/11/2003 9:11:08 AM PST
by
Savage Beast
(Happiness is the best IQ test.)
To: BunnySlippers
a CNN producer ... clearly went too far," CNN clearly goes too far on any day ending in "y".
5
posted on
11/11/2003 9:11:18 AM PST
by
Drango
(A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
To: martin_fierro
Is that German for "shot self in foot"? He-he-he...
6
posted on
11/11/2003 9:11:18 AM PST
by
talleyman
(Caviar emptor (a warning from the sturgeon general))
To: BunnySlippers
CNN manufacturing the news? I'm firmly disillusioned.
7
posted on
11/11/2003 9:11:46 AM PST
by
per loin
To: BunnySlippers
Trustman lived up to her name, and CNN lived up to its tradition.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Phonies.
8
posted on
11/11/2003 9:12:07 AM PST
by
Pharmboy
(Dems lie 'cause they have to...)
and told she couldn't ask her question "because it wasn't lighthearted enough and they wanted to modulate the event with various types of questions." I thought this was interesting ... Lighthearted? Why?
9
posted on
11/11/2003 9:13:08 AM PST
by
BunnySlippers
(Help Bring Colly-fornia Back!)
To: nutmeg
bump
10
posted on
11/11/2003 9:13:39 AM PST
by
nutmeg
("The DemocRATic party...has been hijacked by a confederacy of gangsters..." - Pat Caddell, 11/27/00)
To: BunnySlippers; Dog; MJY1288; Howlin
But when she arrived in Boston for the debate, Trustman wrote, "I was handed a note card with the Macs and PCs version of Clinton's boxers or briefs question" and told she couldn't ask her question "because it wasn't lighthearted enough and they wanted to modulate the event with various types of questions." CNN came up with that stupid question??
Figures
Wonder what other questions they had the students ask?
11
posted on
11/11/2003 9:14:04 AM PST
by
Mo1
To: BunnySlippers
Alexandra TrustmanWhat irony! This young lady needs to learn quickly not to trust the media, particularly when it comes to politics.
I'm not a bit surprised at CNN wanting to lob softballs at the 'rats .... it's their specialty.
12
posted on
11/11/2003 9:15:19 AM PST
by
kayak
(The Vast, Right-Wing Conspiracy is truly Vast! [JohnHuang2])
To: BunnySlippers
CNN regrets that it was caught planting questions.
To: BunnySlippers
CNN doesn't regret doing it. They regret getting caught. There is a difference.
14
posted on
11/11/2003 9:15:45 AM PST
by
Snowy
(Annoy a lib -> Work hard, earn money, and be happy!)
To: BunnySlippers
Yeah right. Just like CNN regrets covering up Saddams' human rights abuses in exchange for access to his spokesmen.
15
posted on
11/11/2003 9:16:06 AM PST
by
Recovering_Democrat
(I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
To: talleyman
Good one!
Exact translation of "Schadenfreude" is difficult, but more-or-less, it means "taking pleasure in someone else's pain or suffering."
Generally it's not a good thing, but I do have some pleasure in CNN's being exposed for the Dem mouthpiece/propaganda organ it clearly is.
16
posted on
11/11/2003 9:16:31 AM PST
by
Prov3456
To: martin_fierro
SchadenfreudeAnd epicaricacy.
17
posted on
11/11/2003 9:17:09 AM PST
by
Consort
To: BunnySlippers
CNN: We Report, We Decide.
To: BunnySlippers
CNN Regrets Role In Planting US Dem Presidential Debate Questionno, cnn only regrets getting caught
19
posted on
11/11/2003 9:18:05 AM PST
by
InvisibleChurch
(Like sittin' on pins and needles, things fall apart, it's scientific.)
To: BunnySlippers
What a minute, we need to parse CNN's statements like we parsed the Clinton Admin's. So if CNN admits its producers staged a light-hearted question, it suggests that they also may have staged other questions. To avoid getting busted hard on that, they chose to reveal that they planted an innocent one. Story gets covered, and they move on, hoping that no one will dig deeper.
The real question is: Did CNN plant other questions, and has this producer done this before in other debates?
To: Mo1
Any minute now CNN will talk about this story and air an apology...
any minute now...
21
posted on
11/11/2003 9:19:56 AM PST
by
DeuceTraveler
((wedgie free for all))
To: Diddle E. Squat
What a minute = Wait a minute
To: Prov3456
Yes, and the English word for schadenfreude is epicaricacy.
23
posted on
11/11/2003 9:21:50 AM PST
by
Consort
To: Diddle E. Squat
Okie dokie Mr Goebells, whatever you say as long as it's for the greater good.
24
posted on
11/11/2003 9:22:15 AM PST
by
jwalsh07
To: Consort
epicaricacyWat dat? (A form of government run by epicures?)
25
posted on
11/11/2003 9:22:47 AM PST
by
Maceman
("To die with your sword still in its sheath is most regrettable" -- Miyomoto Musashi)
To: BunnySlippers
Anybody bother to ask CNN if they "planted" any other cards?
26
posted on
11/11/2003 9:22:52 AM PST
by
sr4402
To: BunnySlippers
In an editorial she wrote for The Brown Daily Herald, the university's student newspaper, Trustman said CNN, a unit of TimeWarner (TWX), told her to ask the question.
And just like a good little soldier, she did what they asked.
27
posted on
11/11/2003 9:25:10 AM PST
by
Xenalyte
(I may not agree with your bumper sticker, but I'll defend to the death your right to stick it)
To: BunnySlippers
Raises all kinds of questions, like was any candidate prepped by CNN to endorse PC or Mac in their answer, was Apple or a PC maker paying for this question as a form of advertising, was 'boxers or briefs' a prepped question...
28
posted on
11/11/2003 9:28:04 AM PST
by
Grig
To: Maceman
See post #23.
29
posted on
11/11/2003 9:28:21 AM PST
by
Consort
To: BunnySlippers
Raises all kinds of questions, like was any candidate prepped by CNN to endorse PC or Mac in their answer, was Apple or a PC maker paying for this question as a form of advertising, was 'boxers or briefs' a prepped question...
30
posted on
11/11/2003 9:28:55 AM PST
by
Grig
To: Consort
I can't even pronounce that!
I wasn't aware that such a word exists in English. How is it pronounced?
31
posted on
11/11/2003 9:29:37 AM PST
by
Prov3456
To: BunnySlippers
Is it my imagination, or is every liberal news org getting the huge shaft lately?
32
posted on
11/11/2003 9:30:25 AM PST
by
Lazamataz
(PROUDLY SCARING FELLOW FREEPERS SINCE 1999 !!!!)
To: BunnySlippers
How sorry are they? Is the producer still working at CNN?
33
posted on
11/11/2003 9:31:10 AM PST
by
mewzilla
To: BunnySlippers
More proof that Bernard Goldberg's BIAS, is correct.
34
posted on
11/11/2003 9:33:02 AM PST
by
Burlem
To: BunnySlippers
I imagine this young lady was razzed mercilessly about such why she would ask such a stupid question. No wonder she blew the whistle on CNN--it was CNN who was stupid.
35
posted on
11/11/2003 9:33:21 AM PST
by
randita
To: Prov3456
"epicaricacy." eh-pee-CARE-ih-cah-see.
Michael
36
posted on
11/11/2003 9:33:42 AM PST
by
Wright is right!
(Never get excited about ANYTHING by the way it looks from behind.)
To: Prov3456
How is it pronounced? epicaricacy
/ep"-i-kar-ik'-i-see/ taking pleasure in another's misfortune: schadenfreude
37
posted on
11/11/2003 9:34:18 AM PST
by
Consort
To: Wright is right!
can you precisely define that please?
38
posted on
11/11/2003 9:37:40 AM PST
by
wardaddy
(...and Yes, I'll be your huckleberry.)
To: BunnySlippers
Can't find much difference between planting a question and the way CNN fabricates much of the actual news.
To: BunnySlippers
This story is getting played wrong. In a DEBATE -- CNN was caught planting softball questions in the audience. I wonder how many others didn't step forward? I couldn't keep up with the STUPID softballs that were being thrown in that debate. It mirrors how CNN treats its reporting of the DNC.
40
posted on
11/11/2003 9:42:16 AM PST
by
Naspino
(I am in no way associated with the views expressed in your posts.)
To: BunnySlippers
Once again, RI's own local lefty rag doesn't carry this story.
Once again, I learn local news from FR before I learn it from any of our state-wide news outlets.
41
posted on
11/11/2003 9:44:49 AM PST
by
ItsOurTimeNow
("Forth now, and fear no darkness!")
To: Consort
Awesome. Thank you. I learn something new every day!
42
posted on
11/11/2003 9:45:54 AM PST
by
Prov3456
To: BunnySlippers; Doctor Raoul; Liz; LS; Howlin; Lazamataz; Sabertooth; William McKinley; remember; ...

But the obvious question isn't being asked of CNN by that AP reporter:
Did CNN give these staged questions to the candidates (or perhaps, just to *one* of the candidates) in advance?
43
posted on
11/11/2003 9:49:35 AM PST
by
Southack
(Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: woofer
heck...it's just what I expected to hear
44
posted on
11/11/2003 9:51:37 AM PST
by
pointsal
To: BunnySlippers
To: Southack
Correctomundo! How can we trust any debate those losers run? They could be handing questions to candidates, the audience, sabotaging certain candidates make-up, screwing up audio, etc. etc.
CNN lost all credibility from me a long time ago, but I am delighted to see further evidence of their corruption.
To: BunnySlippers
Call CNN's viewer response number:
The local number is 404-827-0234
You can chose to speak to a real person or leave a message.
CNN does NOT have a toll free viewer response number.
47
posted on
11/11/2003 9:57:09 AM PST
by
Republican Red
(Karmic hugs welcomed!)
Comment #48 Removed by Moderator
To: BunnySlippers
Regrets only because they were outed.
To: Consort
GuruNet?
50
posted on
11/11/2003 10:09:07 AM PST
by
Humbug
(i haven't the foggiest idea what to type here)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-74 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson