[maggief]

"At about 10:50 a.m., Diana Campos, an employee of a nearby hospital, saw a pregnant woman walking a golden retriever with two men ..."

------

Karen S. found McKenzie an 10:18 a.m. She appears to have a well established time line.

1217
1 Q. And it's a kind of a Golden Retriever dog?
2 A. It is a Golden Retriever, yes.
3 Q. Do you remember -- do you know what the dog's name
4 is?
5 A. McKenzie.
6 Q. Did you find McKenzie on December 24th of 2002
7 somewhere in the vicinity of 523 Covena?
8 A. Yes.
9 Q. And can you describe for the Court what happened?
10 Just start from the beginning. What time of the day was it?
11 A. It was approximately 10:18 that I found the dog.

(snip)

24 Q. When you found the dog, you told us that it was
25 10:18?
26 A. Correct.
27 Q. How is it that you are sure of that particular
28 time?

1229
1 A. I retraced my steps that morning to come up with
2 that time and backed it up from the time on the receipt and
3 the time I made the cell phone call.
4 Q. Okay. What time is on the receipt when you made
5 the purchase?
6 A. 10:34 AM.

[Sandylapper]

So, we're talking about an approximate time difference of 32 minutes in the two women's account of things. I missed something about where her receipts are coming from, and when she did the retracing of her steps. And it concerns me that the bloodhound traced/tracked Laci to/through certain areas of the park. What do we do about the dog? I thought prosecution wanted to use them?