Skip to comments.
Master of the Sea (and the French)[NY Times Review of "Master and Commander"]
N.Y. Times online ^
| November 14, 2003
| A. O. SCOTT
Posted on 11/14/2003 6:18:15 AM PST by eddie willers
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 last
To: B-Chan
I was just thinking that Peter Weir ought to do a space movie of the grand scale as this "Master and Commander" seems to be. Think of all the tools Peter Weir would have as his disposal. Sort of a Star Wars with cajones!
To: B-Chan
"The question is: why can't Paramount make a Star Trek movie as good as purports to be?)"
Come to think of it, the best Trek movies had William Shatner(Kirk) in them, even "Generations".!
To: SomeCallMeTim
At least 20 people walked out of my theater without returning. Were they French?
Try reading one of the novels. It's possible that Patrick O'Brian is just not to your taste.
43
posted on
11/16/2003 11:49:09 AM PST
by
Huber
(11 Presidents, 2372 judicial nominations, zero fillibusters...till now!!)
To: Cpu
The movie is beautifully made, but glaring liberties were taken with nautical reality.
Reminds me of the very old Letterman bit (pre-CBS)-he had a professional welder critique Jennifer Beals (sp) welding technique in "Flashdance".
My uncle, a physician and toxicologist, would comment on the faulty technique of a movie "pathaologist" doing frozen sections for an autopsy.
At some point the layman in the audience just has to say, "Shhhhh".
To: Huber
I may just try that... I love a good book.
To: SomeCallMeTim
You were bored? I don't understand that. I loved it. I thought he broke off the chase and took Bones, I mean Dr. Maturin to the Galapagos because he discovered the sail he was chasing was not the Acheron. It was not a perfect movie, but close enough.
46
posted on
11/16/2003 11:57:53 AM PST
by
Cannoneer No. 4
(Brave Rifles! Veterans! You have been baptized in fire and blood and have come out steel.)
To: Cannoneer No. 4
Oh my... the first 45 minutes were PAINFULLY slow.
I was so confused when, after the slick sailing maneuvre, they came up behind the Acheron. But, rather than attack, they somehow mysteriously ended up in a terrible storm 500 miles south of where they were the night before. I was wondering whether 15 minutes of film dissapeared?????
Can anyone explain this??
To: eddie willers
Ahoy Freeper Maties and shiver me timbers! I done seed the movie, and this be one great flick!
This has to be the opposite of a "chick flick," yet will probably yield a best picture Oscar nomination. Sequels are sure to follow.
Incidentally Matrix Revolutions seriously sucked.
48
posted on
11/16/2003 12:08:13 PM PST
by
friendly
(Man is so made that whenever anything fires his soul, impossibilities vanish.)
To: SomeCallMeTim
As I remember it
Surprise was closing on
Acheron when the seas got rough, as they always do around Tierra del Fuego, and Aubrey kept up the chase through the gail, making 12 knots, until his mizzenmast broke and
Acheron got away.
You weren't moved by that boy in the waves after they cut the mast loose?
49
posted on
11/16/2003 12:58:39 PM PST
by
Cannoneer No. 4
(Brave Rifles! Veterans! You have been baptized in fire and blood and have come out steel.)
To: Cannoneer No. 4
That was a moving scene. My problem was, the "seas getting rough" happened in the blink of an eye. In one scene, they show the Acheron on the horizon... with light clouds and sunshine. Next scene?? The worst storm of all time. It was quite disjointed.
The storm scenes were fantastic. It just happened way to suddenly.
There were plenty of great scenes... sprinkled throughout an otherwise boring, and disturbing film..
To: Cannoneer No. 4
Cool. I was hoping to see the exploits of Stephen Decatur.
51
posted on
11/16/2003 4:53:29 PM PST
by
rmlew
(Peaceniks and isolationists are objectively pro-Terrorist)
To: eddie willers
We saw it yesterday & it was marvelous. The storm scene, on the ship made me very uncomfortable, in its reality. I have not always liked Russel Crowe's movies but this one is exceptional. He is perfect in the role & the attention to detail is amazing.
52
posted on
11/16/2003 5:07:57 PM PST
by
Ditter
To: Cannoneer No. 4
Saw the movie today and was amazed. A great flick and one that didn't have to resort to graphic gore to make the horrors of war seen and felt. This film is powerful and yet can go straight from the movie theater to Broadcast television without a cut or edit being made. I strongly recommend this film.
53
posted on
11/18/2003 8:28:17 PM PST
by
Burkeman1
((If you see ten troubles comin down the road, Nine will run into the ditch before they reach you.))
To: eddie willers
Just saw it last night, enjoyed it very much.
A toast to Master and Commander
54
posted on
11/21/2003 12:35:03 PM PST
by
machman
To: Huber
Finally saw the movie, watched it last night here in the Engineroom, can't wait to get it home and see it on the big screen.
But, as a fan of POB's series, I thought the movie lacked bottom. The characters of Maturin and Bonden missed the mark.
I am listening to the recorded books version now when traveling to & from the boat and really like them. Tull does a great job with Maturin's character.
Stephen Maturin on Seamanship:
"Puddings, We trice 'em athwart the starboard gumbrils, when sailing by and large."
55
posted on
04/21/2004 7:23:15 PM PDT
by
orlop9
To: eddie willers
I finally saw this movie now that it is out on DVD. I found it very enjoyable, although the ending was a bit anti-climatic.
Still--a wonderful tale. Sort of the Conservative antithesis to wheezy Liberal films such as The English Patient.
By the way, I love the old drinking songs they sing:
"Safe ashore at laaaasst Jack!
Folly Rolly Rolly Rolly Rigghhhht---oohh!"
56
posted on
04/28/2004 3:39:54 AM PDT
by
SkyPilot
To: eddie willers
I dunno, maybe it wouldn't have been too bad if Napoleon HAD conquered the continent and the British Isles. He was a closet Zionist with plans to create Zion a 150 years earlier than it did. He also would have given Europe a firm control over the Middle East and probably averted WWI and II. Plus, he was Corsican, not French.
57
posted on
04/28/2004 4:24:45 AM PDT
by
Cronos
(I AM good at math 3.3+2.8 = 6.1!!)
To: Cronos
I am sure it worked out according to the Almighty's plan.
Besides, I toured Versilles and Notre Dame once. The whole Napoleonic ego "I crown myself emperor" was a little too much to take.
58
posted on
04/28/2004 4:35:46 AM PDT
by
SkyPilot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson