Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Creating a New Holiday (Normal people should begin immediately to ask for a Ronald Reagan Day)
Intellectual Conservative ^ | 14 November 2003 | Bruce Walker

Posted on 11/14/2003 9:44:59 AM PST by presidio9

The attempt by Leftists to defame Ronald Reagan has been blunted by the CBS decision to ship its garbage off to Showtime, but the counterattack of conservatives and other normal people should not stop with Dunkirk but should instead be a D-Day against the Leftism of today.

The legacy of Ronald Reagan surpasses any president in modern history. He confronted one of the most evil regimes in human history -- Leftist thugs who murdered more people than even the Leftist thugs of Nazism -- and, ignoring everyone and everything except his own conscience and will, Ronald Reagan toppled that evil empire.

Because of him, we do not wake up each day wondering if a new challenge from the Kremlin may bring the world to the brink of thermonuclear suicide. Because of him, the peoples of Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Hungary, Rumania, Bulgaria, Slovakia and the Czech Republic live in free and independent nations. Because of him, the German people can control their own destiny. Because of him, the threat of world enslavement by totalitarians has largely vanished.

Leftists grudgingly acknowledge that this great victory was similar to the Allied victory over the Axis in the Second World War or the Union victory over the South in the Civil War. That grossly understates what President Reagan accomplished. Ronald Reagan was a greater president than Franklin Roosevelt or Abraham Lincoln.

Each of these three presidents confronted an undeniable evil, and each ultimately defeated that evil. But the similarities end there. FDR and Lincoln were penultimate politicos, who would have prevented war even if it meant that evil would live. Reagan was committing to defeating evil, and because of his willingness to fight that evil, the world was spared the physical destruction of entire nations and the decimation of entire peoples.

America paid a price for the moral ambivalence of FDR and Lincoln. Roosevelt befriended the monstrous regime of Stalin in order to defeat the equally monstrous and more dangerous regime of Hitler. Lincoln suspended constitutional rights on a massive scale and largely destroyed the sovereignty of state governments to win the Civil War.

Presidents of the Cold War before Ronald Reagan left tens of thousands of American soldiers buried in Korea and Vietnam, without bringing the world any closer to triumph over evil. Reagan alone was able to articulate perfectly the moral hollowness of totalitarian Leftism.

As a consequence, the world that Reagan left us is much better than the world that Roosevelt left us, which had the Red Army at the Elbe River and half of the Korean peninsula occupied by a ghastly regime. And as a consequence of Ronald Reagan’s clear moral voice, he did not leave America, as Lincoln did, with the residual evil of a reduced form of black slavery.

Lincoln, like Roosevelt, was a politician first and a moral leader second. His campaign in 1860 was not an unflinching repudiation of slavery as evil, but more an effort to move the nation toward a position of opposition to slavery. As a result, the moral blight that human slavery represented was treated with rhetorical reservation. It took a century for the wrong of legal racism to end in America.

Roosevelt’s campaign in 1940, although tilted against Nazi Germany, was like Lincoln’s campaign eighty years earlier, a moral equivocation. Here was a man with more political capital than any president in history, commanding by far the greatest economy in human history, and FDR could not use that power to define America’s purpose as ending Nazism. Why does anyone think this man was either great or good?

The bloodless victory by Reagan is better in every way than the Civil War of Lincoln or the stumbling entry into world war by FDR. There is only one real precedent in modern American history: the dismantling of Jim Crow by Martin Luther King.

Conservatives opposed Martin Luther King Day because of our problems with some of his politics. Compared with modern “civil rights leaders” is there any question that Dr. King is a vastly superior example of a liberal with conscience?

Conservatives and other normal people should begin immediately to ask for a Ronald Reagan Day, and this should specifically note that like Dr. King, President Reagan not only did great things but he did them with nobility. Resolutions establishing Ronald Reagan Day should explicitly make the connection to the methods and the moral purpose of Dr. King.

Our campaign should begin with state governments where conservative Republicans dominate. We may well wish, when state law allows, for a popular vote on the issue. Beyond all else, we must push and push and push, until the ugly hatred that is Leftism either shows its snarling face or sulks back into its den.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: evilempire; ronaldreagan; ronaldreaganday; teardownthiswall

1 posted on 11/14/2003 9:45:00 AM PST by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Hear, Hear!

Conservatives and other normal people... that makes me chuckle...

2 posted on 11/14/2003 9:50:21 AM PST by vrwinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
As much as I revere Ronald Reagan, I do not want a national holiday in his honor. In fact, most national holidays are treated as jokes - a way to get off work not reflect on the significance of the day.

What holidays do exist ought not to be polarizing but unifying. Yes, I know about MLK Day and some probably have a burr up their butt about Lincoln and Labor Day. While those of us on the right accept Reagan's accomplishments, the left still recoils in horror and I, for one, don't want to give them the excuse to mischaracterize and trash a great man once a year.

The country has honored Reagan in many ways and probably will find still more in the future. Let them suffice. For a man that preached smaller government, it would seem wrong to plaster his name all about the way Sen. Byrd's is in West Virginia. Were he still lucid, I would think Dutch would be grateful for the gesture but would leave such recognition to others.
3 posted on 11/14/2003 9:54:36 AM PST by Tall_Texan ("Is Rush a Hypocrite?" http://righteverytime2.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
A national holiday honoring Ronald Reagan would be great. For now, I'd settle for Reagan's bust added to Mount Rushmore. And I disagree with the writer. I think its Washington, Lincoln and Reagan, for all the ages.
4 posted on 11/14/2003 10:11:59 AM PST by Reagan Man (The few, the proud, the conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
Agreed, but a law should be passed forbidding liberal journalists from referring to "National Airport."
5 posted on 11/14/2003 10:13:56 AM PST by presidio9 (a new birth of Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
That doesn't bother me either. I still refer to many stadiums and ballparks by the names they had before naming rights were sold.

I know the libs do it to be mean but it just makes them look small.
6 posted on 11/14/2003 10:16:17 AM PST by Tall_Texan ("Is Rush a Hypocrite?" http://righteverytime2.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Let's win one for the Gipper!
7 posted on 11/14/2003 11:06:13 AM PST by talleyman (The best defense against the left is a good solid right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
As much as I revere Ronald Reagan, I do not want a national holiday in his honor. In fact, most national holidays are treated as jokes - a way to get off work not reflect on the significance of the day.

I agree wholeheartedly. The last thing we need, or that the Gipper would have wanted (and it pains me to put that last phrase in the past conditional tense), is yet another "holiday" that only Government workers get off.

8 posted on 11/14/2003 11:10:28 AM PST by andy58-in-nh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Ronald Reagan
  1. Got the country going again
  2. Whipped inflation
  3. Ended the Energy Crisis
  4. Transcended Communism
In his first two terms--the standard by which presidents properly should be ranked, since presidents should not serve more--FDR
  1. Gave diplomatic recognition to the Soviet Union
  2. Kept the economy stagnant with high tax rates
  3. Took money out of the economy with Social Security taxes
  4. Let Hitler and Stalin start WWII by seizing Eastern Europe
And during WWII FDR was medically limited to working 20 hours a week--yet he ran for a fourth term, pretending to be healthy enough to serve it. Yet there is now an FDR Memorial on the Mall . . .
9 posted on 11/14/2003 12:32:25 PM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (The everyday blessings of God are great--they just don't make "good copy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson