CIA Bombshell: Saddam Financed Lead 9/11 Hijacker

Also fact, also reported by the FBI, is that Atta received money orders the summer of 2001 in Hollywood FL, from the UAE, and Riaydh as well as posting stuff back there.

Also fact, also reported by the CIA, is that there is a Saudi network of terror charities financing Al Qaeda in the US.

Also fact, also reported by the FBI, is that the Pakistani ISI was also involved with supporting financially, not only the Talib, but also Al Qaeda.

Also fact, also reported by the FBI, is that Iran was involved in the funding of prior Al Qaeda attacks on US assets abroad.

Also fact, also reported by the FBI and CIA, is Syria's involvement with the funding.

Is is surprising that Iraq is also involved?

The more important question: why are the Saudi's totally involved with all aspects of 9/11, why are the Saudi's being given a total free pass. I don't see Iraqi businesses on OUR SOIL or Iraqi's in US mosques screaming death to America, the way Saudi funded agitants do and still get away with.

So OK - go after Iraq, nuke the heck out of Pakistan, but the FIRST BUSINESS WAS TO GO AFTER THE SAUDI'S.

A US COURT ON FRIDAY LET TWO SAUDI SHEIKHS OFF THE HOOK FOR FUNDING 9/11.

Thanks. I've seen that one.
have you seeen this
DoD Statement on News Reports of al-Qaida and Iraq Connections
News reports that the Defense Department recently confirmed new information with respect to contacts between al-Qaida and Iraq in a letter to the Senate Intelligence Committee are inaccurate.

A letter was sent to the Senate Intelligence Committee on October 27, 2003 from Douglas J. Feith, Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, in response to follow-up questions from his July 10 testimony. One of the questions posed by the committee asked the Department to provide the reports from the Intelligence Community to which he referred in his testimony before the Committee. These reports dealt with the relationship between Iraq and al-Qaida.

The letter to the committee included a classified annex containing a list and description of the requested reports, so that the Committee could obtain the reports from the relevant members of the Intelligence Community.

The items listed in the classified annex were either raw reports or products of the CIA, the NSA, or, in one case, the DIA. The provision of the classified annex to the Intelligence Committee was cleared by other agencies and done with the permission of the Intelligence Community. The selection of the documents was made by DOD to respond to the Committee’s question. The classified annex was not an analysis of the substantive issue of the relationship between Iraq and al Qaida, and it drew no conclusions.

Individuals who leak or purport to leak classified information are doing serious harm to national security; such activity is deplorable and may be illegal.
http://www.dod.mil/releases/2003/nr20031115-0642.html

Also
The Memo and the Link Between Saddam and Osama-What if Saddam was involved in 9-11?
FrontPageMagazine.com | November 17, 2003 | Lowell Ponte

Posted on 11/17/2003 7:04 AM CST by SJackson
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1023252/posts

In a startling about face for U.S. intelligence officials, a bombshell memo released by the CIA on Saturday draws a direct link between Saddam Hussein and the 9/11 attacks, citing evidence that Iraqi intelligence bankrolled lead 9/11 hijacker Mohamed Atta in the months leading up to the worst terrorist attack ever on U.S. soil.

The previously secret 16 page memo, released by the Senate Intelligence Committee Saturday morning, says Atta met at least three times in Prague with Iraqi intelligence agent Ahmed al Ani prior to the 9/11 attacks.

I'm guessing that we have one memo, not two duplicates released simultaneously, and this is just an editorial oversight on the part of News Max. I'm also guessing that the Pubbies on the SSCI finally got ticked off enough and they railroaded the release of the memo over the objections of the Traitor Party members. Bully for the Pubbies! Its about time they stand up and realize that the Traitor Party is not a loyal opposition, but rather, the party of traitors, as its name implies.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.