Skip to comments.
Memo splits Intelligence Committee (can't trust corrupt Dumbos with US national security)
CHICAGO SUN-TIMES ^
| November 17, 2003
| ROBERT NOVAK
Posted on 11/17/2003 5:53:35 AM PST by Liz
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
1
posted on
11/17/2003 5:53:36 AM PST
by
Liz
To: Liz
good post thank you
2
posted on
11/17/2003 6:03:34 AM PST
by
not-alone
To: Liz
After Republicans regained Senate control in the 2002 elections and term limits imposed new leadership on the Intelligence Committee, Senate Democratic Leader Tom Daschle insisted on an end to nonpartisanshipNever, ever trust a lieing Democrat. The Republicans tried to be civil with the beasts, but there's just no way to be civil with blood thirsty wolves.
To: Liz
Democratic demands to leap over the staff produced the memo that has laid waste the Senate Intelligence Committee. The same thing they want to do to the country. Leap over the Constitution and lay waste to a great nation.
Never trust a Democrat.
To: Liz
The logical conclusion of the "rule or ruin" strategy is the destruction of the ability of the government to operate a CIA. How far will the Dems take it?
5
posted on
11/17/2003 6:07:18 AM PST
by
conservatism_IS_compassion
(The everyday blessings of God are great--they just don't make "good copy.")
To: Liz
"Roberts is unable to follow his normal inclinations to make peace.""On a personal basis, Roberts gets along well with Rockefeller (and bonded with him on a trip to Iraq earlier in the year). He likes the multimillionaire scion of the famous Republican family, describing Rockefeller's high-flown pronouncements as ''ethereal."
This is exactly why the GOPers in the Senate are so weak willed. We need to elect to the Senate Republicans who are adamant about putting the good of the nation before being buddy buddy with their Rat counterparts and "making peace."
6
posted on
11/17/2003 6:09:33 AM PST
by
KantianBurke
(Don't Tread on Me)
To: conservatism_IS_compassion
How far will the Dems take it? In order to create a socialist society (U.S.S.A.), one has to destroy the current society first. They'll go as far as they have to in order to get that dictorial Marxist society they covet. They want total control over every human soul from cradle to grave.
To: KantianBurke
.....and why the Senate is called a "private club"....rather than a lawmaking body......
8
posted on
11/17/2003 6:22:19 AM PST
by
Liz
To: conservatism_IS_compassion
As many here on FR have stated.....Dumbos will do "anything" to get back in power.
9
posted on
11/17/2003 6:23:23 AM PST
by
Liz
To: concerned about politics
....there's just no way to be civil with blood thirsty wolves.... Should be Repub's campaign theme.
10
posted on
11/17/2003 6:25:06 AM PST
by
Liz
To: Liz
Were I President Bush, I would cut off all intelligence to the Senate Intelligence Committee due to the politicization of this supposedly bipartisan committee. US lives are at risk when politics steers intelligence. The risk becomes even more serious in this war - when America has already been attacked several times (Trade Center, Pentagon, embassies, USS Cole and more). God save us from partisan democrats!
11
posted on
11/17/2003 6:26:20 AM PST
by
NetValue
(They are not Americans, they're democrats and fools to boot.)
To: Liz
"Did the Administration, knowing what they knew, with daily briefings, exaggerate the intelligence (about Iraq)?"
Sometimes the cojones on these Dems are breathtaking. Not only is it well known that the same type of intelligence on Iraq went back at least to the beginning of the Clinton administration, but it is further well known that the Peyronie President regularly skipped his daily intel briefings. Indeed, he only met with CIA chief Woolsey twice during his tenure including the day he was appointed. I guess that, in the Dem universe, Clinton can't be responsible because he didn't keep up to speed on National Security.
To: Inwoodian
Clinton can't be responsible because he didn't keep up to speed on National Security. And he said he bombed Iraq because of it's WNDs.
To: Liz
As usual, this sort of thing is met with a big *YAWN* in the mainstream media.
14
posted on
11/17/2003 6:42:45 AM PST
by
Gritty
To: Liz
Its all about power...
They just "wants their precious".
15
posted on
11/17/2003 6:45:17 AM PST
by
norton
To: norton
Its all about power...
They just "wants their precious".
What an apt description of the demon-rats!
16
posted on
11/17/2003 6:50:33 AM PST
by
Roughneck
(9 out of 10 TERRORISTS PREFER DEMOCRATS, the rest prefer Saddam Hussein)
To: concerned about politics
"Never trust a Democrat."
Good advice. Democrats are like Palestinians, any attempt to extend your hand in friendship is always met by rock throwing and homicide bombings.
To: Liz
Very interesting, I hope the Republicans keep the heat going.
18
posted on
11/17/2003 7:37:08 AM PST
by
MontanaBeth
(Thank you Mom and Dad-for being raising me Conservative!)
To: Liz
BUMP!
19
posted on
11/17/2003 7:42:32 AM PST
by
jmstein7
To: norton
"they just wants their precious"
"Yes, that's what we'll do, let HER kill them and then we take the precious."--Smeegle
HER-Hillary?
20
posted on
11/17/2003 7:43:03 AM PST
by
MontanaBeth
(Thank you Mom and Dad-for being raising me Conservative!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson