Same-sex Agenda Advances in Britain [The church is attacked; Is the Queen covering for Charles?]

CWA ^ | November 17, 2003 | James Kimball

[LiteKeeper]

"read later" is a rarity for me. I suspect that many of the Threads that I comment on much more extensively are ones that might not be of interest to you. However, since I peak in every once in awhile at work - but if the posting is long, I will use "read later" to flag an article for reading at home in the evening. :-)

[churchillbuff]

Whatever his sexual foibles, James I considered himself a devout Christian.

Ditto for Prince Charles.

[GeekDejure]

It seems as though the Queen of England is covering for Princess Charlene... who is in line to be the next Queen !!!

.

[Technogeeb]

Whatever his sexual foibles, James I considered himself a devout Christian.

James wasn't a sodomite; the modern revisionist history that asserts that he was is based on the writings of a few of his political opponents (Weldon, Osborne, Peyton) after his death and various statements taken out of context, while ignoring the more obvious proof of his true nature (for example, his own statements considering such behavior to be an abomination). Those who believe such nonsense are mostly victims of incompetent (or malicious, in the case of James) scholarship. A few others know the truth, but continue to spread the lies because it suits the goals of their homosexual agenda.

Most of these same historians falsely insist that Jesus was also homosexual, as well as a number of other historical figures. There is no limit to the depths of deception to which they will sink in order to justify their perversions.

[Mr. Mojo]

Gives new meaning to 'God Save the Queen'.

LOL